Jump to content

Trembley on Matusz,Tillman,Arietta and Erbe


QBsILLEST1

Recommended Posts

Thanks for posting this - it is very interesting. I am not surprised to hear that Trembley is very high on Arrieta - he has referenced Arrieta several times in discussions with the media. But it's interesting to hear he thinks Arrieta will be the best of the lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be willing to bet a ton of money that Trembley is wrong on this one.

I hear u on this one, I can't wait to see how our pitcher from this year turns out to be also. In a few months we are going to have a "Big 4" . I would love to have Crow thrown in the mix and watch all 4 be in Baltimore around the same time in 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be willing to bet a ton of money that Trembley is wrong on this one.

It would not surprise me no matter which one turned out to be best. If I had to lay odds:

Matusz - 40%

Tillman - 35%

Arrieta - 25%

It's more important to me that all three (or at least two of the three) turn out to be above average starters, than which one is the best.

BTW, Markakis said Matusz was the one who impressed him most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm most excited about Matusz of the 3. Tillman seems closer to ready than some people imply here. And no one talks about it, but if Tillman comes up this year, he will probably be the youngest pitcher in the league! Color me excited!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would not surprise me no matter which one turned out to be best. If I had to lay odds:

Matusz - 40%

Tillman - 35%

Arrieta - 25%

It's more important to me that all three (or at least two of the three) turn out to be above average starters, than which one is the best.

BTW, Markakis said Matusz was the one who impressed him most.

Agreed 100%. I just think that sometimes Trembley puts a little too much emphasis on perceived "intangibles" (note the paradox) - and, for instance, fails to take into account that, say, Tillman is a couple of years younger than Arrieta.

Let's note that, at 20, Arrieta's draft stock was plummeting in college, while Tillman was lighting up AA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear u on this one, I can't wait to see how our pitcher from this year turns out to be also. In a few months we are going to have a "Big 4" . I would love to have Crow thrown in the mix and watch all 4 be in Baltimore around the same time in 10.

I'd like for them to select Crow too. He'd fit right in with that group and wouldn't be far behind them in terms of a call up. I see one year max in the minors for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed 100%. I just think that sometimes Trembley puts a little too much emphasis on perceived "intangibles" (note the paradox) - and, for instance, fails to take into account that, say, Tillman is a couple of years younger than Arrieta.

Let's note that, at 20, Arrieta's draft stock was plummeting in college, while Tillman was lighting up AA.

Good point. I'm just glad that all three acquitted themselves so well this spring. None of them did anything to suggest they are overhyped. For good measure, we got good performances from Bergesen, Hernandez, Perez, Mickolio and McCrory. I'm very pleased that all these guys had positive experiences with the big club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point. I'm just glad that all three acquitted themselves so well this spring. None of them did anything to suggest they are overhyped. For good measure, we got good performances from Bergesen, Hernandez, Perez, Mickolio and McCrory. I'm very pleased that all these guys had positive experiences with the big club.

It was awesome hearing about Arrieta, Tillman and Matusz come on strong and be just as advertised. It sure didn't take them long to get acclimated to the majors, thats for sure. I definately agree with you, it was important for our young pitchers to gain positive experience from ST. Now its time for them to go back down to the minors, keep winning and bring that winner's attitude with them to the team when they are called up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God I hope not. Not another pitcher. I believe he's suppose to have really bad mechanics as well. We need position players with talent.

I remember you wanting Smoak really badly over Matusz right? I could go either way on this one, BUT. Honestly last year I think we should have went position player(because of the elite position player talent in last years draft) and pitcher this year(pitcher heavy draft up top). Knowing that AM philosophy is to draft a pitcher in the 1st round, and that a college pitcher is the safest bet, and knowing that AM knows the O's have no room for error, you can narrow our pick down to a few select people. I think we are going to take Crow, or White may fall to us. Maybe even Grant Green will fall all the way to round 2. I understand why people are getting scared that we have no position talent in the organization, but our surplus of pitching are what is going to make up our position talent, but that will only be when the time comes. IMO it does not matter whether we draft a pitcher or a position player, what matters is we draft the best talent/value available so that when it comes time to compete, we can trade off the redundancy and bring in what we need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Works for me,  as long as the first piece is a Norby type!  Only one of Ortiz/Westburg/Cowser/Kjerstad should be traded for Cease.  Let them pick one of them and a couple in the 8-15 range then a lottery pick or two if needed.  But giving up 2 of those is to pricy for the return.  I like Cease, but personally value him as a very solid #3 starter.  Sure, he COULD perform better than that,  but I wouldn't bet on it.  Maybe he reverts back to his 2022 form, but I think it more likely that what we get is what we saw from him in 2023, with an improvement in numbers due to the defense behind him. 
    • Exited about this kid and the future of our international signings. We have to remember the initial reporting don’t mean a whole lot. We’ve had success in the 100-500 k range too.
    • Downtown restaurants should like this too.  Much better for any local entertainment venues.
    • Cease is a solid MLB starting pitcher with 2 years of control  who's team has clearly made it known that he's available.  Of course there is a lot of interest.  There is a lot of interest in the Orioles' prospects, as well.  Fans of both teams are hopeful that their team will get maximum value for their assets in any trade.  I'm sure that it is sometimes difficult for GMs to reach a meeting of the minds on a player's value, in which case they need to work out a restructure of the discussed deal that may not include that player.  I think Elias' opinion on Ortiz is likely to be pretty close to what posters on this site are telling you.  If the White Sox GM views Ortiz as you do, it would seem that a deal between the two teams would most likely not have Ortiz included.  I'm sure that isn't all that unusual and the GMs just turn the page and look at working out a trade involving other players/prospects.  What confuses me is that you seem to rate Ortiz lower than we do and lower than the various sites rate him, but would like a trade of Cease for Cowser and Ortiz.  I'm against that deal because I think 2 prospects rated that highly would be an overpay.  It seems to me, you agree.  You simply rate Ortiz lower.  Seems to me that the answer in such an impasse that would make both parties happy would be to replace Ortiz with another prospect that is lower rated than Ortiz -- which would be of equal value in your mind, since you rate Ortiz lower and still think the proposed trade is a fair one.  Make sense?  Maybe replace Ortiz with Norby.
    • I would definitely do Westburg  and Cowser.
    • 100% agree with you.  Especially when you haves waves of prospects coming up behind these guys.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...