Jump to content

Wednesday 7/10 Cubs vs. Orioles


86this

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, drjohnnyfever1 said:

Boy, lots of doomsdayers in here.  Let's have a little patience like our boys...

Deep down, we all know that this team is not as good as its record. They aren't as good as last year. The offense is all or nothing, if they aren't hitting the long ball, they aren't scoring. The defense is spotty. And the pitching is too thin.

With all that said, they are in first place, with a chance to open up a big lead in the division, and they just can't take care of business against sub-.500 teams. It's very frustrating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Uli2001 said:

Deep down, we all know that this team is not as good as its record. They aren't as good as last year. The offense is all or nothing, if they aren't hitting the long ball, they aren't scoring. The defense is spotty. And the pitching is too thin.

With all that said, they are in first place, with a chance to open up a big lead in the division, and they just can't take care of business against sub-.500 teams. It's very frustrating.

I'm so tired of the word "frustrating". Buck, the players, and the O's media used it for years and years when we sucked. It's all they could say, night in and night out as we got beaten by both good and bad teams. We need a different, fresh word that opens eyes and stirs emotions. "Frustrating" is like saying "Hi, how ya doin'?" "Good." -- it has no effect. It's numb.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Uli2001 said:

Deep down, we all know that this team is not as good as its record. They aren't as good as last year. The offense is all or nothing, if they aren't hitting the long ball, they aren't scoring. The defense is spotty. And the pitching is too thin.

With all that said, they are in first place, with a chance to open up a big lead in the division, and they just can't take care of business against sub-.500 teams. It's very frustrating.

Not sure why you don’t think they are as good as last year?  This team is better than the one we ended the year with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Uli2001 said:

Deep down, we all know that this team is not as good as its record. They aren't as good as last year. The offense is all or nothing, if they aren't hitting the long ball, they aren't scoring. The defense is spotty. And the pitching is too thin.

With all that said, they are in first place, with a chance to open up a big lead in the division, and they just can't take care of business against sub-.500 teams. It's very frustrating.

Bro we have the best OPS and 2nd best ERA in the AL. We're not perfect and there are areas for improvement but let's not stray too far in the other direction. This is a good team and I would say definitely better than last year. Burnes wasn't here, Gunnar wasn't this good, and Westburg wasn't this good just to name a few highlights. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Uli2001 said:

Deep down, we all know that this team is not as good as its record. They aren't as good as last year. The offense is all or nothing, if they aren't hitting the long ball, they aren't scoring. The defense is spotty. And the pitching is too thin.

With all that said, they are in first place, with a chance to open up a big lead in the division, and they just can't take care of business against sub-.500 teams. It's very frustrating.

The record is what it is.  They've won the games they've won, and lost the games they've lost.  That's sport.

We are as good as our record and saying we aren't is alarmist.  The season has ebbs and floes and we're along for the ride.

If you're accepting we're going to lose to the Cubbie's, I guess that is your - and anyone else's prerogative.  It's the 3rd inning.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • When you are in a championship window, roster spots are extremely important. You need room to wiggle, but also usable players for the major league roster in that year. They could add another, but I don’t think Pham or Van Loon would be lost. If they are, they’re easily replaced. We need shuttle arms, with many of our current group out of options. I wonder if they actually even take a rule 5 pick this year. 
    • This whole rebuilding from the ground up stuff needs to stop. The rebuild was over a few years ago and the Os have a defined philosophy of how they draft, how they develop, etc…what they had to rebuild from is completely irrelevant now. It’s done, it’s been done. They draft how they draft because they believe it’s the best way. They develop how they develop because they believe it’s the best way.     
    • He looked good last night. Not overly reliant on his FB too.
    • You are looking for reason here?  lol. Good luck. Of course he needs to make adjustments. We knew that the day he drafted him. If he was batting 500 right now, he would still need to make adjustments. Thats what happens.  
    • This idea that Gunnar should move to third because he’s not elite at SS is pure nonsense.   Even the idea of moving him because he’s not elite and then talking about Holliday and Westburg at SS is laughable. Even with the defensive slump, Gunnar is average at SS.   However, he only made 8 errors at SS last year in 83 games and he was among the top 3 SS in the AL in defensive metrics in the first half. He’s a 23 yo SS who’s already good with the ability to be well above average, if not elite.      SportsGuy has had a Gunnar to 3B agenda for quite some time.   A lot of it had to do with his obsession that Holliday was drafted 1:1 as a SS and SS for the Baltimore was his destiny.   It’s sad. Think about this.  He doesn’t argue that the current, super talented SS can get better.   He only argues that Holliday can get better.    We know Gunnar does everything well at SS but he’s been error prone in the 2nd half.   He has the tools to be very, very good.   He’s also shown he can go long stretches at SS without making a lot of errors. Stop the sillines!
    • Right and I’m not trying to turn it into that. Im solely talking about the long term outlook of Gunnar at SS and I don’t see him as a long term answer over there but I do think it’s possible.  
    • You’re observing Honeycutt really struggle in his debut which has led you to the conclusion that he’s going to need a lot of reworking this off season.   Conclusion  a judgment or decision reached by reasoning.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...