Jump to content

Excellent Meoli article on Zach Fruit's deveopment


Frobby

Recommended Posts

He's been better his last four starts. Before that Fruit was walking too many. Isn't K'ing a lot but the walks are improving. The last 3 numbers in the chart are BB, K's and HR's.

14 2024-06-29 A+-SALL Aberdeen IronBirds   Brooklyn Cyclones 1-4   4.0 3 2 2 2 6 1                                        
15 2024-07-05 A+-SALL Aberdeen IronBirds @ Greensboro Grasshoppers 1-5   5.0 5 2 2 1 3 2                                        
16 2024-07-11 A+-SALL Aberdeen IronBirds @ Asheville Tourists 1-5   4.2 1 1 0 1 8 0                                        
17 2024-07-19 A+-SALL Aberdeen IronBirds   Wilmington Blue Rocks 1-5   4.2 0 0 0 1 2 0                                        
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ever since Meoli wrote his article featuring Zach Fruit, he’s been dominating:

7/11 4.2 IP, 1 H, 1 R, 0 ER, 1 BB, 8 K’s

7/19 4.2 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 2 K’s

7/25 5.0 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 2 BB, 6 K’s

Maybe Meoli wasn’t just blowing smoke.  😉

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Ever since Meoli wrote his article featuring Zach Fruit, he’s been dominating:

7/11 4.2 IP, 1 H, 1 R, 0 ER, 1 BB, 8 K’s

7/19 4.2 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 0 BB, 2 K’s

7/25 5.0 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 2 BB, 6 K’s

Maybe Meoli wasn’t just blowing smoke.  😉

 

It is pretty funny because I looked at the Aberdeen box score and saw Zach Fruit pitched well tonight.  Saw he was 24 and had just been drafted last year.   So I decided to head  over to OH to see if there is anything about this guy on the board.  I didn’t expect such a long thread with so much heated back and forth.  😄   Now I am really rooting for this guy!  You got to love the name at the very least.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Fruit had a bad game last time out (3 IP, 3 R, 2 ER), but rebounded today with 5.1 innings of 1 hit, 1 run ball, walking 3 but striking out 6.  He lowered his ERA on the season to 3.24,

I caught the first 4innings today and he was pretty dominant.  Consistently got ahead of batters.  His fastball was live and really getting on the batters, a lot of swing and miss.  I stopped watching in 5th.  Pretty sure he had 5 Ks & 1 hit through 4.  Was surprised to see his final line with 3BB & 1R. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Just Regular said:

Six no-hit innings tonight seems goodish.

6 no hit innings on only 69 pitches!

He's now thrown 101 innings and given up only 68 hits. And recently, he seems to have figured out how to keep his walks in check, which has been his only weak point this year.

Pretty dominant.

Legit prospect?

Edited by bluedog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, bluedog said:

Legit prospect?

Well, let's looks at things:

He's 24 years old in High-A ball
He's walking 4.6 batter per 9.
His FIP is 3.72
His xFIP is 4.07
Since July he's been very good 
image.thumb.png.b931221454f7cb03c8a6a8c050023681.png

But that 9% swinging strikes rate is low and it appears he still relies on batters to chase for misses. 

I think we need to wait to see how he does in AA before getting him too far up the list. He might be a late bloomer, but the walk rate against younger High-A hitters concerns me.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Well, let's looks at things:

He's 24 years old in High-A ball
He's walking 4.6 batter per 9.
His FIP is 3.72
His xFIP is 4.07
Since July he's been very good 
image.thumb.png.b931221454f7cb03c8a6a8c050023681.png

But that 9% swinging strikes rate is low and it appears he still relies on batters to chase for misses. 

I think we need to wait to see how he does in AA before getting him too far up the list. He might be a late bloomer, but the walk rate against younger High-A hitters concerns me.

These are very legit points.  I don’t care too much about his age.  He had a circuitous path through college before the O’s drafted him at 23.  I’d be more worried about his age if he’d been in our system for 3 years and was only at Aberdeen.  The walk rate is a bigger issue for me.

The O’s are drafting a lot of pitchers who didn’t go to prestige college programs or who put up mediocre numbers at prestige college programs.   They seem to think they can unearth some diamonds in the rough there and coach ‘em up.   They haven’t really had any demonstrated successes yet (I.e., pitchers who’ve reached the majors or are on the cusp), but I’d say Fruit’s class was really the first one where a fair number of pitchers got picked before rounds 11-20, so I’m interested to see how that group fares.  At least Fruit has put himself squarely in line for a promotion and we’ll see if he can make further progress in AA. He’s come a pretty long way in a year and seems to respond well to coaching, so hopefully there’s room for more improvement.  
 

Edited by Frobby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

The walk rate is a bigger issue for me.

And the swinging strike rate. That's kind of huge for me. I'm sure it doesn't tell the whole story, but really good pitchers often don't get you too far without the stuff to compliment it.

But I'm sure there's more to that story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

These are very legit points.  I don’t care too much about his age.  He had a circuitous path through college before the O’s drafted him at 23.  I’d be more worried about his age if he’d been in our system for 3 years and was only at Aberdeen.  The walk rate is a bigger issue for me.

The O’s are drafting a lot of pitchers who didn’t go to prestige college programs or who put up mediocre numbers at prestige college programs.   They seem to think they can unearth some diamonds in the rough there and coach ‘em up.   They haven’t really had any demonstrated successes yet (I.e., pitchers who’ve reached the majors or are on the cusp), but I’d say Fruit’s class was really the first one where a fair number of pitchers got picked before rounds 11-20, so I’m interested to see how that group fares.  At least Fruit has put himself squarely in line for a promotion and we’ll see if he can make further progress in AA. He’s come a pretty long way in a year and seems to respond well to coaching, so hopefully there’s room for more improvement.  
 

Age doesn't care about the route a pitcher took. It matters because of the amount of progression a pitcher makes at that age and beyond when it comes to command is typically minimal. 

Fruit has certainly put himself on the distant radar and probably deserves a promotion to AA to see how he does there, but I I've seen players like this that get write ups and suddenly he becomes a "prospect" in some fans eyes. He's shown improvements over his pretty bad numbers in college, but the one thing that is very similar is his K-BB ratio, which is not great. 

I'll go back and watch more of his latest starts to see if I see anything in the stuff that jumps out at me, but I'd like to see a little more domination and less walks for a guy pitching to much younger competition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

These are very legit points.  I don’t care too much about his age.  He had a circuitous path through college before the O’s drafted him at 23.  I’d be more worried about his age if he’d been in our system for 3 years and was only at Aberdeen.  The walk rate is a bigger issue for me.

The O’s are drafting a lot of pitchers who didn’t go to prestige college programs or who put up mediocre numbers at prestige college programs.   They seem to think they can unearth some diamonds in the rough there and coach ‘em up.   They haven’t really had any demonstrated successes yet (I.e., pitchers who’ve reached the majors or are on the cusp), but I’d say Fruit’s class was really the first one where a fair number of pitchers got picked before rounds 11-20, so I’m interested to see how that group fares.  At least Fruit has put himself squarely in line for a promotion and we’ll see if he can make further progress in AA. He’s come a pretty long way in a year and seems to respond well to coaching, so hopefully there’s room for more improvement.  
 

Corbin Burnes did not attend a prestigious College program. Just sayin'...      https://smcgaels.com/sports/baseball

I am intrigued by the idea of drafting pitchers for specific skillsets and pitch shapes, which is rumored to what the O's have done the last few drafts. Its a low risk strategy that only has to hit once or twice to justify the exercise. If Zach bears fruit (pardon the pun) and develops into an MLB SP, the O's have a bargain.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Zach Fruit had his season finale last night: 4 IP, 3 R, 2 ER, 5 H, 1 BB, 7 K’s.   He finishes the year at 3.03 ERA, 1.24 WHIP, 9.5 K/9, 2.1 K/BB.   Over his final 14 starts dating to mid-June, he had a 2.04 ERA, 1.07 WHIP, 9.5 K/9, 2.0 K/BB.   He allowed only 33 hits in 61.2 innings, but also walked 33.   Basically, like so many of our Elias era minor league pitchers, walks are the issue.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I would add that Mountcastle and Urias were also losses to the offense.  Throw in a couple of slumps to our other regulars, creating 4-5 weak spots in the offense, and that's a lot to overcome.  I don't discount the mental part of hitting, but I do think most of our problems are directly linked to the rash of injuries we've suffered.  
    • Just my opinion. ZiPS projects him for a .708 OPS next year and I'd bet on the under. I think he's a .230/.295/.395 hitter with a below average glove. A Rio Ruiz type of player.
    • We have to keep Irvin "pumped up."  When he's "deflated" he's just no good.  🤣
    • There just seems to be some sort of disconnect between upper management, coaching and the players right now. Do I know that for sure? Obviously no. But with the dropoff we've seen in offensive production something is off here. They literally have been mediocre since the All Star break. And the only big loss on the offensive side is Westburg. 
    • There are no answers, only Zuul. But seriously, I think the issue at play here is we look at the body of work of guys like Eloy, Slater, O'Hearn, Rivera, and (to a lesser extent) Soto, you see where the holes are. I get that O'Hearn was thrust into 1B near FT due to the Mountcastle injury, but that didn't explain Hyde from playing O'Hearn in the OF when he is one of the worst defensive OFers on this team. Right now, this team is very much ailing. Ramon coming back will definitely help spell the need for O'Hearn to be a 1B by maybe letting Rivera play over there.  We need to get back to a point where O'Hearn is only hitting against righties and is playing sparingly in the field. Eloy is a liability at this point. I was a proponent of seeing what mechanical tweaks they could make similar to what they did w/ Hicks (and even O'Hearn!) and they did catch lightning in a bottle maybe due to excitement/adrenaline and BABIP being unsustainably high, but right now his flyballs aren't carrying and his groundballs aren't finding holes, so there's probably a reason why Chicago is saying, "Haha, told you so!" This team is in freefall offensively, at this point...just give the ABs to Mayo. You can't simultaneously say, "He needs to make adjustments!" and then let him have 5 ABs over 5 games. That isn't a way to grow a player. Not everybody can be a part time player and be effective off the bench/sparingly. Kjerstad has shown an ability to hit lefties in the minors as well as in the majors (albeit in very limited time, he his 4 for 10 against them). Let the kid play. Slater has fallen off a cliff, but at least he's a solid defensive OFer I get it, nobody is going to solve the offensive woes of this team when it comes to the rookies/young guys. Mayo, Holliday, Kjerstad, even Cowser...they're all still adjusting. The change needs to come from the main stays. Now, Adley is starting to hit, Gunnar is back on a hitting binge, but this lineup desperately needs some consistent production from Tony to go along with it because right now way too much pressure is being put on the bottom of the lineup and the young guys. And I'm not convinced Westy solves any of those issues as wrist injuries are a beast to bounceback from quickly.   
    • I get the desire to poo-poo analytics and advanced data, etc.  It does get obnoxious hearing about statcast pages in red when guys aren't hitting well.   But more obnoxious are cries of "the old eye test" and "old school" and the other various "yelling at cloud" types of arguments.  If everyone was stuck with the way things were done back in the day, we'd never progress and never advance in any area of life or society.  That includes how we look at and discuss baseball.
    • If the above is true, how do you get a team to deliver timely hits, stop pressing, and quite expecting to lose?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...