Jump to content

2024 Prospect Promotion Incentive (#32): Griff O'Ferrall - SS - (Jr) Virginia (VA)


Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

I get the Talent Accumulation aspect - it is most of what we have watched since Elias was hired.

Kjerstad is a major outlier for medical reasons, and Jordan Westburg sits next to Ryan Mountcastle as a prominent MLBPA member who may feel like theirs and their friends' competitive capabilities were constrained due to club circumstances.

I agree 3 contributors any draft is a favorable outcome, but if on Day 1 you can't forecast a high pick as a backup catcher and 5th infielder...

He is a 5th infielder because we have Gunnar Henderson. Look around the league. Cleveland is deploying a guy with 600 OPS at shortstop. Volpe OPS 666, Red Sox need shortstop, Rays need shortstop, Mariners need a shortstop. There are about 7 or 8 shortstops in the league that can hit. The average catcher OPS for 2024 is 690. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oriolediehard said:

It is very ridiculous and disappointing that we passed on Brecht.  I wonder if Elias knows what he is doing???

I think if you look at what's been happening to pitchers the last few years, Elias is even more justified than he's ever been in not going pitcher in the first 3 or 4 rounds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

I think if you look at what's been happening to pitchers the last few years, Elias is even more justified than he's ever been in not going pitcher in the first 3 or 4 rounds. 

Since the supply of healthy pitchers is low he's been right to avoid acquiring them via the draft?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Since the supply of healthy pitchers is low he's been right to avoid acquiring them via the draft?

No, since pitchers get injured extremely frequently for extremely lengthy periods of time, it's best to use your early draft capital on players who are much more likely to stay on the field and either contribute for your team or be traded later for pitching.

And then using the later rounds to find a slew of pitchers who are undervalued but make sense within your player development system. Rather than putting all your eggs in the "guy throws a million miles an hour" basket. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, hydropups said:

Bad baseball name, imo, and therefore won’t be a top prospect. Future ptbnl.

Unlike those traditional baseball star names.. Brooks, Adley 

Edited by tntoriole
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, interloper said:

I think if you look at what's been happening to pitchers the last few years, Elias is even more justified than he's ever been in not going pitcher in the first 3 or 4 rounds. 

You are right, my bad!! It makes sense!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, interloper said:

No, since pitchers get injured extremely frequently for extremely lengthy periods of time, it's best to use your early draft capital on players who are much more likely to stay on the field and either contribute for your team or be traded later for pitching.

And then using the later rounds to find a slew of pitchers who are undervalued but make sense within your player development system. Rather than putting all your eggs in the "guy throws a million miles an hour" basket. 

So you can trade 12 years of team control for one?

If something is scarce and valuable you should be trying to stockpile it.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

So you can trade 12 years of team control for one?

If something is scarce and valuable you should be trying to stockpile it.

Eh, we will agree to disagree on their draft approach, that's fine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, my preference would be for a pitcher here, but it's pretty obvious that Elias is not changing his approach.

Kind of the opposite hitter to Honeycutt, with a great hit tool, but not a ton of power. Not excited to see reports that he may need to move to 2B which tells me the arm is a little short, but we'll have to see once he gets into the system.

I initially thought this was a money saver, but the read ups suggest this is not an overdraft so I expect him to take slot to sign. 

Let's be honest, there are not a lot of real SS prospects in the system right now that aren't in A-ball or lower. If he can stick at SS, he seems like he's got utility guy floor with the chance to be an everyday guy of he's able to develop a little pop.

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I’m sorry but using words like gamer and scrappy don’t do players justice.

It’s like when you see pics of a house that is for sale and all the pics are of the outside but nothing on the inside.  There is a reason for that..because the inside sucks.

I get the point of using some of these terms but when you say them, it takes focus off of their strengths and makes them more of the little engine that could type guy.

 

This seems to me to be an issue you could work through if you wanted to. Appreciating work ethic, dedication to your craft and the gumption (you might not like that word either but oh well) to make yourself into a very good baseball player are attributes many fans admire. I would submit to you that God given natural ability is a joy to behold, but many of us enjoy the player who does more with less talent a bit more. But, hey, you do you.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

This seems to me to be an issue you could work through if you wanted to. Appreciating work ethic, dedication to your craft and the gumption (you might not like that word either but oh well) to make yourself into a very good baseball player are attributes many fans admire. I would submit to you that God given natural ability is a joy to behold, but many of us enjoy the player who does more with less talent a bit more. But, hey, you do you.

Huh?  What does this even mean?  I never said it’s a bad thing but when that’s what you lean on, that’s putting lipstick on a pig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Since the supply of healthy pitchers is low he's been right to avoid acquiring them via the draft?...

If something is scarce and valuable you should be trying to stockpile it.

It's not pitchers that are scarce and valuable, it's healthy pitchers. Unfortunately that's not a commodity that is known in advance in the draft pool. If you're drafting pitchers you're not drafting "healthy pitchers," you're drafting cannon fodder. Better to wait till other teams' fodder is pruned to the more proven subset that you need (i.e., healthy).

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yep.   Factoring in the reverse splits, and the fact that Hyde seems to like to give Anthony a day off from the outfield in each series, and we are in a stretch where we aren't seeing any lefties, he found a spot to give one of his bench guys a start.
    • Elias overestimated Mayo’s value. A guy who strikes out a lot and has no defense is not a valuable prospect, even if he’s strong as a bear and can hit balls to the moon. I wish had been traded at peak value, and yes, I would be happy to trade Holliday, too, but his value has gone down as well
    • I think it's because Pivetta has reverse splits this year. Now, do you value his career numbers or this year...I'm not sure. But maybe SIGBOT cares about this year more maybe because of pitch mix/effectiveness can vary year to year. Who knows. Against righties: .279/.311/.514 - .825 OPS Lefties: .187/.251/.365 - .616 OPS  
    • So he has the same first 6 hitters and plays Rivera over Mayo who has hit better and is a much better defender along with playing Slater in the outfield which gives us better defense over Santander and takes McCann a light hitting catcher out of the game.  So he made an upgrade at 3rd base with how both guys are playing and flipped Slater for McCann and thus makes it an awful lineup.  It makes me laugh how much people get upset about nothing.  
    • Coulombe doesn't have righty/lefty splits. It's why he is so damn good.  Akin doesn't have righty/lefty splits this year, and he didn't last year but he was awful/hurt. He definitely did in 2022. But he stinks with runners on and in high leverage situations. Soto is super inconsistent and when he blows up he's awful. Last year he stunk against righties, but was excellent against lefties. I reckon they want him to get back to that. To me, the pecking order would be this: Coulombe and Perez for high leverage situations Akin only in for fresh innings and to give 1-2 IP. Soto I just don't trust. He had a nice stretch there for a minute, but in the end...he was pitching in mostly low leverage situations. 
    • Last night's lineup was Hyde first decent lineup in a long time, but tonight's lineup is another abysmal one from him. If Elias was going to make a dumpster dive trade for Austin Slater, I can somewhat see the logic behind strictly using Slater as a platoon player. But I definitely don't understand giving him more starts against righties. What both Elias and Hyde are saying by giving Slater opportunities is, "We don't care about stats or splits, we have a good feeling about this guy." That's it, and that's terrible roster management.  Slater has extreme favorable career splits against lefties, and the Elias apologists on this board pointed to Slater being a good platoon matchup hitter against lefties, saying he makes some sense if you believe his struggles against lefties this season would normalize closer to his career line. Yet Slater is still actually hitting better against righties this season. Ultimately, in the end, Slater is a .600 OPS hitter overall this season. Which makes him unplayable to any competent manager or GM. There was a reason Slater was available at the trade deadline for cash considerations. And it's because he sucks. Emmanuel Rivera, meanwhile, has a .597 OPS this season. Sorry, not even a gold glove 3B is worth rostering with that kind of bat. Yet Hyde continues to give Rivera at bats over a top 10 prospect who should be getting as many starts as possible to get comfortable. Unbelievable.  Slater and Rivera could each hit a home run tonight, and that still wouldn't change how terrible they are or that it's bad lineup optimization to start both of these bums. 
    • Right. Let's just be honest and say that he did a great job building the farm system through the Houston "tank" philosophy, but now must prove he can be good at building the MLB product. But yes, this trade looks dreadful at the moment. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...