Jump to content

McDermott to start Wednesday?


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, OsFanInOhio said:

A bit surprised they wouldn’t just give Irvin a spot start if Cade can’t come back yet and nobody else is on full rest. But interested to see how he looks. 

I think Irvin is likely to get DFA'd after deadline. Unless a mop up presents itself I hope we don't see him again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Personally I think this is to give McDermott a look at the major league level to know how bad of a starting pitching need they have. 

It could be a matchup thing as well. The Marlins have the ability to run out 8 righties(w/ SH) and L Jazz Chisholm vs LHP. 

I do agree that this is a good time to get a chance to look at McDermott. Weak lineup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Personally I think this is to give McDermott a look at the major league level to know how bad of a starting pitching need they have. 

But even if McDermott has a great start, they know the walks will most likely be an issue moving forward.

Not sure how McDermott proves anything at this stage of the season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

I think Irvin is likely to get DFA'd after deadline. Unless a mop up presents itself I hope we don't see him again.

He's extremely frustrating. Looks like the next coming of John Means for over a month and then right back to throwing meatballs. 

I've personally also had enough and hoping he becomes a throw-in in a deadline deal. He's got two more years of control but no options. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

But even if McDermott has a great start, they know the walks will most likely be an issue moving forward.

Not sure how McDermott proves anything at this stage of the season.  

He can prove the stuff plays at the MLB level.  I think like Tony said, it’s also to see how much of a need we have.  Like, do we need a stud #1 and a 3/4 or can we pick up one impact guy and absorb the load in house? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HowAboutThat said:

So I guess McDermott is being considered instead of Povich? And if that is true, then Povich wasn’t adequate even as a fifth starter? 
If so, then this is why I don’t think Hancock would be a helpful pickup, nor Montas.

If we get a rotation pitcher, it has to be someone better than our current number three, because otherwise we are just making a more or less lateral move. Raising the floor is important, but a better 5th guy isn’t meaningful. A better THIRD guy is definitely meaningful.

Think it's more a function that Povich was optioned on 7/13 and isn't eligible to be brought back up until 7/28. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OsFanInOhio said:

A bit surprised they wouldn’t just give Irvin a spot start if Cade can’t come back yet and nobody else is on full rest. But interested to see how he looks. 

Think it's more a function of Cole Irvin's last 6 appearances: 9.00 ERA, 6.03 FIP, 1.053 OPS, 6 dingers, 1.88 WHIP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would much rather see McDermott than Irvin, so I hope that's the move.

I doubt very much that McDermott's performance would affect whether we pursue a legit #3 starter in the trade market.  I do think that he could be included in a trade for a #3 starter, though.  

Someone would have to be sent down or DFAd for McDermott, right?  Vinny Nittoli, Bryan Baker, Cole Irvin?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

He can prove the stuff plays at the MLB level.  I think like Tony said, it’s also to see how much of a need we have.  Like, do we need a stud #1 and a 3/4 or can we pick up one impact guy and absorb the load in house? 

That's a lot to try and figure out on one start.  I hope that Elias doesn't rely on such small sample sizes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

I would much rather see McDermott than Irvin, so I hope that's the move.

I doubt very much that McDermott's performance would affect whether we pursue a legit #3 starter in the trade market.  I do think that he could be included in a trade for a #3 starter, though.  

Someone would have to be sent down or DFAd for McDermott, right?  Vinny Nittoli, Bryan Baker, Cole Irvin?  

Last time Suarez started they gave that duty to Cole Irvin. But think that was more a function of the O's being down. If the O's are up, don't think Irvin gets the ball.

I strongly doubt the O's jettison Irvin right now. Yeah, he's been abysmal, but the O's have shown a proclivity to send down rather than to cut...Baumann not withstanding. 

Nittoli doesn't have any options remaining. Neither does Irvin. Nittoli is a righty. So is Baker. There's redundancy there.

I reckon Baker is the easy decision. He's the only one with an option remaining and he's not particularly amazing. There's also redundancy with Burch Smith, tbh.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, webbrick2010 said:

I think Irvin is likely to get DFA'd after deadline. Unless a mop up presents itself I hope we don't see him again.

Zero chance he gets dfa’d. He’s cost controlled for multiple years and performed well late last year and early this year. Could he be traded? Maybe. But dfa? Not a chance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Personally I think this is to give McDermott a look at the major league level to know how bad of a starting pitching need they have. 

Hopefully we will be getting a significant veteran upgrade at the trade deadline, so the next week or so could be the last chance for either McDermott or Povich to get a look as a starter, absent injuries or regression. McDermott could perhaps get two starts before the trade deadline. 

Could also be a chance for scouts to look at him if he is being used as trade bait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If you’d rather have Trumbo under any circumstances, well then. God only knows how many extra runs scored because he let a ball fall in front of him, but it was a lot. An out at the plate is only an out, and it may or may not come with RISP, but a missed catch in the OF gives the offense another chance, extends the inning, puts more pressure on the pitcher.  Mullins saved a lot of runs with his defense and speed even when he wasn’t hitting. im not talking about errors, nor am I talking about routine fly balls, but about the extra inches a good defender gets that make the difference between a catch and a non- catch, and that’s important. And no one knows before the game what will be required of the defender. nine guys come to the plate, and if one of them is in the lineup not for his offense, but for what he offers with the glove, that’s fine. The other eight should cover for him. Thats why Kevin Pillar had a successful career.
    • Not sure why you bothered to quote me. I was helping another poster figure out how not important a left fielder is when it comes to defense in the modern game. You don't start a left fielder for defense.
    • Were we on Sunday Night Baseball that Sunday 9/17?    My Google of Rosh Hashanah 2023 said it ended at sundown the Sunday. I'm not Jewish either but I am baseball, and in childhood the Sandy Koufax stories I remembered most were about Yom Kippur. The Google also reminded me Kremer's turn as Texas finished the sweep was just 2 days after October 7th. Let's get a sweep, guys.
    • I don’t care what Slater did before he came to us this season. Just like I didn’t care what Hicks did before he came to us last year.  Since we acquired Slater he has a .707 OPS vs LHP and Cowser has a .500 OPS vs LHP.  It’s a coin flip. If we stick to what we’ve done, then it will be Slater. He hasn’t not started versus a LH SP since we acquired him.  I’m good with him or Cowser. Mullins is a lock. If I had to bet I’d think the lineup will be, 1. Gunnar SS L 2. Westburg 2B R 3. Santa RF S 4. Mounty 1B R 5. Adley DH S 6. Slater LF R 7. Urias 3B R 8. Mullins CF L 9. McCann C R
    • So he pitched on it last season?
    • Without Looking - Do you know who was second in Innings Pitched?  Pretty incredible.
    • Looks like it began on Friday, Sep 15 and ended on Sunday, Sep 17.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...