Jump to content

Who will post an .800+ OPS the rest of the season?


Frobby

Who will post an .800+ OPS the rest of the season?  

56 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will post an .800+ OPS the rest of the season?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 08/06/24 at 21:29

Recommended Posts

Who do you think will finish the season strong, I.e., .800+ OPS the rest of the way?   I could only list 10 players in the poll, so I left off McCann, Slater and Urias.  Feel free to include any of them in a post, if you think they’ll join the party.    I also didn’t include Kjerstad or Westburg, since I don’t know when if at all they’ll be back in the regular season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cowser looks like he's found his groove, and might OSP 1.000 the rest of the way. Gunnar's back and hitting the ball on the screws every AB. O'Hearn walks a lot, and goes oppo so often I don't know why opposing defenses still shift on him. Santander will likely SLG over .600 so he's a gimmie. Only guy I'm iffy about is Holliday because it's still a SSS. If he continues as is for another 8-10 games I expect pitchers to make an adjustment which will force him to make some changes in his approach. That might cause him to go into a mini-slump ala Cowser earlier this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the Orioles currently only have 4 healthy, active players with an OPS around or above 800 (with a decent sample size, that is):

  1. Gunnar: 946
  2. Santander: 846
  3. O'Hearn: 803
  4. Cowser: 795

That's it. Adley is at 759. Mountcastle at 744. 

Honestly, I think the O's need to go back to a platoon at 1B between Mountcastle and O'Hearn. Mounty's splits have about a 100 point OPS difference and a 50 point AVG difference. That opens up the DH spot to rotate any number of guys now that there's a bunch of options between Jimenez, Slater, Adley, Santander.

Here's my order of 800 OPS in terms of likelihood:

  1. Gunnar
  2. Santander
  3. Mountcastle
  4. O'Hearn
  5. Cowser
  6. Adley
  7. Holliday
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went with Henderson, Rutschman, and Santander. Henderson because he’s Henderson, Rutschman because he’s due for a good hot streak, and Santander because he seems like he’s on a roll this year (good timing with free agency).

I hope to see the rookies do it, but that seems too optimistic to hope for. Certainly not impossible. Mountcastle is always a threat to get hot but he’s also a threat to suck. I left Mullins and Jimenez off because they are so bad this year that any hope seems like too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only ones I'm confident about are Gunnar and Santander. I think they will easily top that number. I tend to think Adley will. He's been in a huge funk, but when right, he's a .800 OPS play. O'Hearn will likely be right around there. And then, the likes of Cowser, Holliday and Mayo each have a chance, probably in that order. Essentially it breaks down (to me) like this: 

DEFINITELY WILL: 

1. Henderson

2. Santander

50/50 OR BETTER:

3. O'Hearn

4. Adley

5. Cowser

25-50%:

6. Holliday

7. Eloy

WOULDN'T BE COMPLETELY SHOCKED:

7. Mayo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • And btw, I’m not saying you try to field a team that is only made of players 25 years old or younger…you need some vets…but get good ones. If you are going to block these kids, who are really talented, block them with players that are actual difference makers.    I know they were hamstrung by Angelos and that hurt obviously but you could have done more with what you had imo.
    • Is Norby going to be the 2020s Steve Finley?  
    • This is what I’m talking about though.    The Orioles are acting weird imo. Yes, winning matters and changes how you operate but this is a team that has done nothing but try to build from within and pat themselves on the back for how well they are developing but then they turn around and don’t use the guys you developed.    You block them with guys like Frazier, Hicks or Jimenez or whoever else over the last 1-3 years. And we aren’t blocking them with good players. We are blocking them with over the hill vets who don’t provide much value. Thats what I find odd. Would Cowser be even better had you just played him last year?  Would Kjerstad be further along if he had been given better chances?  Would you have dealt Norby and/or Stowers if you played them?     It’s really frustrating to me. It’s like they went all in with tanking/rebuilding for 1-2 years too long but then when it comes time for that pay off, they don’t fully follow through. Again, I know winning changed things but really, winning last year should have always been the plan, so they should not have been caught off guard.
    • Basically, the only big driver is winning and, to a much lesser extent, investment. Basically, if investment creates more winning, the fans will come. Rubenstein needs to make a splash. Right now, we've just seen him throw hats around and slap T Rowe Price everywhere he can. The rubber meets the road this offseason. If the O's putter out and have an early exit in the playoffs, are season ticket sales going to skyrocket? I don't think so. Let's look at what happened the last time the O's started winning. In 2011, they stunk and bottomed out at around 1.75m fans In 2012, they surprised everybody and not only had a winning season for the first time in forever, but they made the playoffs, too. Attendance went up to 2.1m In 2013, on the heels of a playoff appearance and apparently renewed interest in the team that doesn't suck perpetually, attendance went up even though they missed the playoffs at 2.35m fans In 2014, the O's won the division, but coming off a playoff-less year in 2013, attendance only went up 100k fans from 2.35m to 2.46m Now, 2015 was an aberration, IMHO. About the only time I'll ever say that crime perception impacted attendance was 2015 due to the Freddie Gray protests. Attendance dropped to around 2.3m from 2.46m. Now, it could be because of the protests, but it also could be that the team was mediocre. They didn't have a winning season, and only won 81 games. Attendance dropped again 2016, even though they made the playoffs, but they won 89 games and lost in the WC game. From then on, it's pretty obvious. They kept losing and losing spectacularly. COVID, etc.  Anyways, I don't see a world which the team exceeds 2.5m fans/year. The Nats coming to town really destroyed the upside. Even if Rubenstein starts spending money and the team makes major upgrades to the stadium experience...the ceiling is probably around the 2.5m fans/year number. Which, let's be frank, would be averaging nearly 31k fans/game. Just win. BTW, I wrote an article on this and did some analysis on whether winning, the homicide rate, and/or spending has an impact on attendance and, well: https://stephenpauladams.substack.com/p/orioles-attendance-is-up The main takeaway is winning matters, spending has little correlation, and the homicide rate has a very weak correlation.  The Rubenstein era will be interesting since this is a fresh slate and you don't have the fan apathy because of Angelos/constant losing.
    • Or maybe just given regular playing time instead of getting two hits and getting benched the next day.
    • I disagree.  @Frobby just listed 8 pitchers and that doesn't include Morfe, and Reilly that we got at the trade deadline.  We're never going to have that high end high school pitching prospect phenom, but Morfe might be close.  I think are pitching is a little underrated.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...