Jump to content

I hate watching pitchers who can’t hold runners


Frobby

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think holding runners on is overrated.

The goal should be keeping guys off base in the first place.

Mostly when guys are on base I'd rather the pitcher spend most of his energy and focus on the hitter.

Every successful stolen base is worth 0.3 runs.  That's not nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Without question. Can’t hold forever or throw over as much as you want.  

Holding the ball is actually one of the most effective ways at slowing basestealers, and that's completely off the table now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pickles said:

The Orioles are a team that mostly does all of those things.

I agree. My concern is the "mostly" part. I'm picking a nit here but mostly means there are missed opportunities to do things that help win games and don't rely on talent or luck. The old saying that good team defense doesn't fall into slumps is probably overblown a bit, but the essence of the sentiment is that there are fundamental things, that if obsessively attended to, help win ball games. Mostly doesn't cut it. 

Thanks for reading my rant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Something can be both overrated and worth more than nothing.

I'm actually surprised honestly that a stolen base is worth that much.  In fact, a stolen base is more valuable than a walk to the offensive team, which makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

I agree. My concern is the "mostly" part. I'm picking a nit here but mostly means there are missed opportunities to do things that help win games and don't rely on talent or luck. The old saying that good team defense doesn't fall into slumps is probably overblown a bit, but the essence of the sentiment is that there are fundamental things, that if obsessively attended to, help win ball games. Mostly doesn't cut it. 

Thanks for reading my rant.

Other than the defense is not as good as it was with the injuries to Westburg and Mateo, and Gunnar's slump (which hopefully appears over), this team is pretty solid defensively.

And it's far to point out that a couple guys on the team are easy to run against, but it's certainly not a staff-wide problem.

Thist team does those "little things" to win games.  It does not do them perfectly and 100% of the time, but that is a standard that no team lives up to.

This is a good team that is talented and fundamentally sound.  If they weren't we'd have a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I'm actually surprised honestly that a stolen base is worth that much.  In fact, a stolen base is more valuable than a walk to the offensive team, which makes sense.

But you need a baserunner to get the steal (in the vast majority of cases). 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

But you need a baserunner to get the steal (in the vast majority of cases). 

 

Sure, but I'm just telling you what the math says.

Personally, I'm more annoyed by walks than giving up stolen bases, but the math says I shouldn't be, which is counterintuitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Today was the first time all year that Perez blew a lead.   

I admitted in an earlier comment that I’m terrible at internet searches, so forgive me for asking…

how many times has Perez come into a game with a one run lead to protect?


Yesterday he was wild, threw 16 pitches, only 6 for strikes, allowed two walks, and an inherited runner to score, so not blowing a lead is maybe more a function of the situation he comes in to, rather than any particular virtue on his part.

Even if he’s protected a lot of one run leads, it doesn’t really change the fact that bringing him in today was not a good decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, emmett16 said:

Burnes, Suarez, Kimbrel are all very slow.  Seems like some low hanging fruit to make some adjustments.  Word is out you can run on the O’s. 

Kimbrel has been in the league for 15 years and you want him to make some adjustments?

I'd rather he stop walking so many.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Sure, but I'm just telling you what the math says.

Personally, I'm more annoyed by walks than giving up stolen bases, but the math says I shouldn't be, which is counterintuitive.

Runner on first what would you rather have happen?

The runner steal second.

The batter reach first via walk.

Edited by Can_of_corn
Had my words in the wrong order.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Kimbrel has been in the league for 15 years and you want him to make some adjustments?

I'd rather he stop walking so many.

I want to see them change something up.  Could be many things.  
 

Of course walks are killers.  No doubt.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Getting to hear Jason Benetti, Carlos Pena and Kirk Gibson some of the afternoon was a treat. It was new to me earlier this year Gibson is still broadcasting almost a decade after his Parkinson's diagnosis...good for him. Benetti dumping the White Sox for the Tigers gives me some Miller to San Francisco vibes...he is excellent. Baseball as entertainment - it is wonderful that Carlos Pena, literally the player pushed aside so Scott Hatteberg could play offense more efficiently, has become a strong SABR-oriented analyst.
    • I don't think the rookies get to pick what the wear.  I 100% am sure the vets are picking these outfits.  
    • I’d be shocked if the O’s do better than 2-4, and I’m half expecting them to go 1-5.
    • Worst female impersonator ever!
    • I watched the inning where the Tigers scored their 2 runs.  Our friend Meadows had two check swings that easily could have been called strikes, but instead he walked to load the bases.  Carpenter popped out but then Perez had an insane at-bat where he fouled off a ton of pitches, wasn't fooled by anything, and then delivered a bases loaded double which proved to be the difference. Our guys would likely have whiffed on just about every pitch in those at-bats, but their guys have a crazy amount of confidence right now and it has served them very well.   I do think they have a good chance of winning out and ending with 88 just based on who they play, which means we have to go 3-3 this week or we are out of the 4 spot.  Hopefully their luck will finally run out against us (assuming we can win enough to get in), but if it doesn't, I would love to see them knock out the Yankees.
    • If they played baseball another month maybe. Elias has been pretty much no comment on anything other than time is not on his. His last Lat issues had him control problems ( I Believe ) when he first came back. I'm just happy to have the others back.
    • 6 games left, they haven’t won more than one game in a series since the beginning of the month (against the White Sox for context). I see no reason to think they’ll do any better than 2-4 for remainder of the season.    Plus, i said it “feels” like. It’s an emotional response, not an analytical one. I’m going off the premise that they’ve been an absolute mess for quite a while and a playoff spot seems like a weird place to be for a team that’s played .400 ball since the All Star Break.  They could sweep the rest of the season, who knows? Just saying it feels bleak. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...