Jump to content

Arizona Fall League


Jim'sKid26

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Wagner is an interesting name.  He sort of fits.  As does Trimble.  I have no idea on their health.  

It would be nice to send EBJ and he sort of could rewrite the "bad" stretch he had in Aberdeen.  

I think EBJ’s stint at Bowie already has overwritten his time at Aberdeen.   He ended the season on a very positive note.   That’s not to say he shouldn’t go to the AFL.   Maybe he will.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the trades from the farm system is there any chance we get the wishlist for the AFL?

Hitters - Basallo, Beavers, EBJ

Pitchers - McDermott, maybe a guy or two that has to be added to the 40 man to avoid the rule 5. Like Hoffman, or Strowd. Just to get a longer look to see if they’re worth adding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

With all the trades from the farm system is there any chance we get the wishlist for the AFL?

Hitters - Basallo, Beavers, EBJ

Pitchers - McDermott, maybe a guy or two that has to be added to the 40 man to avoid the rule 5. Like Hoffman, or Strowd. Just to get a longer look to see if they’re worth adding.  

0% chance you get all three of those hitters.   I put EBJ at 40%, Beavers at 20%, and Basallo at 10%.    If they want Basallo to get more reps, he’ll just play some winter ball back home.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RZNJ said:

0% chance you get all three of those hitters.   I put EBJ at 40%, Beavers at 20%, and Basallo at 10%.    If they want Basallo to get more reps, he’ll just play some winter ball back home.    

I do remember seeing that Basallo went #1 overall in the winter league draft last year. So that will probably be where he ends up. Heck, that’s probably better competition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I do remember seeing that Basallo went #1 overall in the winter league draft last year. So that will probably be where he ends up. Heck, that’s probably better competition. 

I would say it’s without a doubt better competition.   Many current and former ML players in the winter leagues.   The Arizona Fall League is basically AA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Houston Roth is the only pitcher that has any promise right now. Not entirely sure why he repeated Bowie, but he should be in line to be at Norfolk next season. He did miss a month or so with an ankle injury in July, so that might have something to do with it. Has a high strikeout to inning rate, was also a starter who got converted to long relief and closer at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don’t sleep on Willems. In his age 20 season, as a C, he hit 17 HR and put up a .784 OPS across A+ and AA. 

Not too shabby. He got that big bonus, and the feeling was that we settled on him and got left holding the bad because I think McLean and another underclassmen didn’t sign. Willems also struggled at first. Also, he’s a pudgy dude. I prefer stocky. 

All that is the past though. He’s a pretty solid prospect as a LH C. 

Feels underrated. Especially after the graduations and trades. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about Juan Rojas?  As a 20 year old in A, he put up 14.6% K-BB%, 0.17 HR/9, 44.6% GB rate, and 14.9% SwStk%. Among pitchers in A that are 20 or younger and have pitched at least 40 innings, Rojas ranks 4th in HR/9 and 10th in SwStrk%.

He reportedly throws his FB ~93 and has a nasty sweeper, though I recall Tony not being too keen on his stuff a couple years back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Warehouse said:

What about Juan Rojas?  As a 20 year old in A, he put up 14.6% K-BB%, 0.17 HR/9, 44.6% GB rate, and 14.9% SwStk%. Among pitchers in A that are 20 or younger and have pitched at least 40 innings, Rojas ranks 4th in HR/9 and 10th in SwStrk%.

He reportedly throws his FB ~93 and has a nasty sweeper, though I recall Tony not being too keen on his stuff a couple years back.

Short left-hander with very questionable command and a 92 MPH fastball. Sweeper can sometimes be good and is where he gets most of swings and misses.  If he can get more into the mid-90s maybe a reliever prospect, but I just don't see enough velocity to offset the lack of command. Gets a lot of swing and miss on chase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Entering the year, I kind of had Braylin Tavera on the dream scenario of could the team come out with someone to keep up with the prior 3 years success of Gunnar, Mayo and Basallo.

Nobody could, but Creed Willems did a lot more than I thought was reasonable to hope for.

Elias' 2nd tier college results are terrible, but the teenagers make up for a lot - that I think is his main strength as a GM.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • No, as it appears to be a group think decision, where all have some input.  In the end it really doesn't matter if it's all Elias, Sigbot or Hyde or some combination of the 3, Hyde is the one who defends it to the media/fans, and he's the one who gets paid to take the critism/blame.  Either way, starting Slater is the move that WHOEVER make the decisions appears to love, so that's what I expect to see, even if it doesn't make sense based on this years performances.
    • I’m guessing he may be bulk reliever later in game. Have to see. 
    • You think Hyde alone makes the decision?
    • Gil has been terrible in his last 2 starts, he has  given up 10 earned runs in 11 innings
    • It's a meaningless game so hard to read anything into it. It could also be more of an "opener" gambit so that Davidson can be brought in with favorable matchups. For a team that believes so strongly in matchups, I don't know why we don't use the opener more often, especially when it has been effective against us. 
    • Both are deserving. That’s not the point. How they construct the pen in ‘25 may be different. None of the guys you mentioned have been pen guys, although McDermott probably should be. Young and Rogers are more of a starter repertoire. Armbruster and others, like Tony said in another thread, should be pen arms. You need flexible and effective arms to move up and down, while they gain experience. We need some guys with some swing and miss stuff. Adding Bautista back into the back end moves everyone down a notch, but some of the guys we have now will likely have to move on for the purposes of flexibility. There is always some natural turnover, and for good reason. 
    • And?  If they were buying his career stats, then they were fooled by a bait and switch.  Yeah, career numbers are good, but they don't reflect the reality of this year.  .541 OPS against LHP.  Elias/Hyde has a tendency to bring in guys who might have had good career numbers, but who are not playing at that level in the current year, but then letting them play like they are performing at career levels.  Slaters numbers this year don't reflect that he should be getting starts versus LHP over Cowser, even with the struggles Cowser has had.  That said, I fully expect to see Slater starting as that's the move Hyde will love, and will then speak eloquently at how great Slater is hitting against LHP this year, even though that's clearly a lie.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...