Jump to content

Other teams playoffs game thread


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It all works.

Just score runs.

Absolutely, whoever scores the most runs wins. The question is how to do that. The O’s approach has been to hit big dongs and it didn’t work for them at a tune of 0-5 the past two postseasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it possible to have a discussion about the playoffs, on the MLB board, without constant criticism of the Orioles early exit and hitting?  There are 1000 places to do that elsewhere on the board. 
 

Came here for discussion of an exciting DS round so far and just getting yet another thread I’ll have to ignore, like I do the rest of the board, for a while. Annoying 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

Is it possible to have a discussion about the playoffs, on the MLB board, without constant criticism of the Orioles early exit and hitting?  There are 1000 places to do that elsewhere on the board. 
 

Came here for discussion of an exciting DS round so far and just getting yet another thread I’ll have to ignore, like I do the rest of the board, for a while. Annoying 

How about the Dodger's manager whining about Manny throwing a ball into the their dugout?  Can you get softer than that?

Anyone see the video?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn’t hear about that. That was a crazy game with the crowd throwing stuff at the outfielders too. No love last between those teams that’s for sure. 
 

Tonight’s game in SD is must see TV just because that crowd is going to be WILD 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lot of great crowds at these games so far in fact (throwing stuff onto the field notwithstanding). Yankees crowd I must begrudgingly admit was pretty raucous you could hear drum beats, maybe the occasional horn, in addition to their usual annoying chanting and sound effects. Phillies always have great crowds. SD and LA turning it up a notch. Detroit and Mets and KC will almost certainly add to that list shortly. Makes it that much more fun to watch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

How about the Dodger's manager whining about Manny throwing a ball into the their dugout?  Can you get softer than that?

Anyone see the video?  

Manny has a grudge at the Dodgers for not wanting him after his rental. That's all it is, sour grapes. It makes him look small.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...