Jump to content

Is Joe Jordan Improving?


Recommended Posts

When I had the good fortune to speak with Joe Jordan a few months ago, I asked about his prior drafts with the Orioles. He believes he has a very good staff and has had good drafts. He does not hide from his record - after all, it's out there for everyone to see. Jordan did say he was a "big self evaluator" when analyzing past picks. He was big on the "process" - what factors led to how a particular player was chosen and whether, in retrospect, the "process worked". Jordan expressed confidence that the process would also lead him to "draft better in the fifth year".

So, I ask, can you tell if Joe Jordan is a better "drafter" of talent today?

Do you notice changes in the players he selects today versus 2005/6/7?

What are strengths and weaknesses?

I think he is better today, but will expound more later.

I'd also like to throw out to comments:

I am really impressed with how successful, IMO, our scouts and Jordan are in selecting pitchers in the first six rounds or so. Britton and Erbe have produced tremendous value for where they were selected, as have Berken and Zagone (6th round), and, of course, Matusz and Arrieta. Olson moved through the system on multiple BA League Top 20 lists. Beato, Bascom and Hamblet are the only disappointments and two of those guys are in Frederick. This gives me tremendous comfort in that our staff likes these pitchers so much - Hobgood, Henry, Berry, etc.

I also take comfort in that the two "pure shortstops" drafted by our organization (Blake Davis and Miclat) are true defensive shortstops. This gives me comfort regarding the Givens pick.

Hopefully, this will lead to some good discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I don't think we are seeing what Jordan can do in this draft as his hands have been tied by MacPhail's budget IMO.

I think before this draft, we were seeing what Jordan can do, but MacPhail seems to really have reigned in the spending for this class and Jordan's picks have regressed as a result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we are seeing what Jordan can do in this draft as his hands have been tied by MacPhail's budget IMO.

I think before this draft, we were seeing what Jordan can do, but MacPhail seems to really have reigned in the spending for this class and Jordan's picks have regressed as a result.

What are you going to do if we actually spend more this year than last? How many posts will you withdraw?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we are seeing what Jordan can do in this draft as his hands have been tied by MacPhail's budget IMO.

I think before this draft, we were seeing what Jordan can do, but MacPhail seems to really have reigned in the spending for this class and Jordan's picks have regressed as a result.

It's been discussed elsewhere, but I wonder if reigning the spending has to do with our expanding international scouting and we're looking to throw money towards more talent in other areas such as in Asia or try to make a splash in Cuba.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we are seeing what Jordan can do in this draft as his hands have been tied by MacPhail's budget IMO.

I think before this draft, we were seeing what Jordan can do, but MacPhail seems to really have reigned in the spending for this class and Jordan's picks have regressed as a result.

Can you start putting the IMO at the front of your sentences? From here on out, I'm translating it as "Ignore My Opinion."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you going to do if we actually spend more this year than last? How many posts will you withdraw?

Gonna be tough to hit $7.3 million with what we've drafted thus far.

I don't think it hits $6 million.

He'd have to take a crazy pick in Day Three for it to come close...

I'll take my medicine if I'm wrong, and I'll be happy to do it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gonna be tough to hit $7.3 million with what we've drafted thus far.

I don't think it hits $6 million.

He'd have to take a crazy pick in Day Three for it to come close...

I'll take my medicine if I'm wrong, and I'll be happy to do it...

What if the Orioles ponied up $2.5 Million for Hobgood, $4 Million for Sano, and $2.5 Million for the remainder of the draft class? Would you call this a successful draft as Sano would likely be a first rounder if he were draft eligible?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if the Orioles ponied up $2.5 Million for Hobgood, $4 Million for Sano, and $2.5 Million for the remainder of the draft class? Would you call this a successful draft as Sano would likely be a first rounder if he were draft eligible?

Of course he would. I'm pretty sure JTrea just wants the best possible players in the system; is that too much to ask for?

The problem with your hypothetical is that Sano isn't happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been discussed elsewhere, but I wonder if reigning the spending has to do with our expanding international scouting and we're looking to throw money towards more talent in other areas such as in Asia or try to make a splash in Cuba.

Thank you.

MacPhail said that he wanted to be more active in Asia, and last winter he went out and spent significant money on Uehara.

MacPhail also said that he wanted to be more of a player in the Caribbean. The Caribbean signing period starts in about three weeks.

Under the circumstances, I don't get how anyone would assume the limits of the budget.

Not to mention that we have no idea how hard they will go after the potential overslots like Henry, Martin, and Aaron Wirsch, of whom almost nothing has been mentioned.

But yeah, obviously MacPhail's budget has been tying Jordan's hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course he would. I'm pretty sure JTrea just wants the best possibly players in the system; is that too much to ask for?

The problem with your hypothetical is that Sano isn't happening.

No, but I won't be surprised to see a serious investment in Caribbean talent for the first time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just my opinion, but I think it's wrong to conclude that, just because the O's drafted some high picks that will sign for slot or even below slot, that means those choices were made for monetary reasons. I truly believe that Hobgood and the other high picks were chosen because that's who Jordan wanted at the time.

The Hobgood choice, I think, will define this draft. Clearly, the O's staff valued him more highly than a lot of other scouts did. If there judgment is proven correct, the critics will have to tip their hats and say, this guy Jordan really knows what he's doing. If that pick fails, he will be open to a lot of critics saying "I told you so."

I don't have an opinion as to whether Jordan has gotten better over the years. I think maybe his mission is changing slightly, because we now have a nice core of young players who are in the majors or on the cusp, and there is still a lot of pitching talent in the upper minors. Therefore, I think high school pitchers who will take 4-5 years to develop (and some will fail specatcularly) are a better investment for us today than they would have been 3 years ago. But overall, Jordan has been pretty consistent in looking for talent regardless of need or timetable, and not being afraid to take a risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we are seeing what Jordan can do in this draft as his hands have been tied by MacPhail's budget IMO.

I think before this draft, we were seeing what Jordan can do, but MacPhail seems to really have reigned in the spending for this class and Jordan's picks have regressed as a result.

:deadhorse:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know about Jordan. Since he's came on board, who has made the bigs?

Olson

Reimold

Hernandez

Wieters

Am I missing anyone?

Rowell and Beato are looking to be some pretty high profile busts, but it's still early.

Sure, it's not fair to judge him based on who's made the bigs, because it's too early and lots of guys are in the pipeline. That said, 2005 and 2006 are a pretty dissappointing at this point.

In terms of the OP - is he improving? We won't know for a long time if that's the case.

On the other hand though, look at Demacio. He had some really awful drafts. In 2000 for example, no one in the top 30 panned out. The only player to make the Show with the O's was Kurt Birkins. (Brandon Fahey didn't sign that year.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gonna be tough to hit $7.3 million with what we've drafted thus far.

I don't think it hits $6 million.

He'd have to take a crazy pick in Day Three for it to come close...

I'll take my medicine if I'm wrong, and I'll be happy to do it...

I think a couple of the 2-10 guys could be asking for close to $1mios. A couple more could be asking for $.5mios. So I could see getting up to $6 - 7mios.

I'd prefer the budget up around $10 - 11mios given some of the supposedly signable names that fell, and personally I'd love a draft budget of around $13mios. I think the amateur draft would be a good place to spend an extra $5mios a year to try and combat the fact that we will likely be spending half of what the Yankees spend on salary each year, and about 2/3 of what Boston spends. Seeing Tampa go after Bailey and Malm back-to-back was tough to see.

Regarding Jordan's drafting, I think he is better in that you can see more clearly that he is identifying what he views as "value" without sacrificing ceiling. That's great, particularly if you have a certain budget. I think he also does a good job of identifying talent and athleticism without sacrificing baseball instinct. That's huge, as well. I thought this draft in particular was very solid and quite interesting. Because I'd seen so many of the top 200 play, I had obvious preferences, but I'm interested to see what these kids sign for and how they get started.

I also think it's important to note that you can find guys that will be good, but you also need to make sure you're hitting guys that will be good ML players. I sometimes worry that in selecting some of the kids from the JuCos and some of the injury risks that the organization doesn't quite grab enough pedigree players. I think a little more balance in that direction would be nice, but as we've said before it's his job on the line so you can't put limits on how he runs things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • This board is smart enough to realize that the grass isn't always greener. The only way I see Hyde on the hot seat is if we miss the playoffs completely, which still feels very unlikely. Even then, I doubt he'd be fired during the offseason, but maybe. But then what? I don't think you give Buck Britton a shot at this roster. He's doing his thing and doing it well at AAA helping to develop guys. Could bring back Buck Showalter or Joe Girrardi, those sound like fun names. Or better yet, I bet everyone here with a torch and a pitchfork has their own little crystal ball with a short list of candidates ready to catch lightning in a bottle. 
    • The 4-run deficit was surmountable if we had more than one player who can hit the damn ball.   Kimbrel giving up six runs in the 9th may turn out to be a blessing.    
    • I wonder if last night was kind of a face saving tipping point though. Kimbrel and/or Eloy are easy famous names if Elias wants to "get serious" about optics. Not anything involving any of the long term chosen ones obviously.  
    • Really hoping the Minnesota series means nothing. I don’t care what seed they get right now..just get in. They aren’t any better at home than they are away. If you can have your spot clinched by Minnesota, I want to see them rest as many guys as possible for those games.
    • Parsing words I think "the testing of our depth" part is as close as Elias will come to critiquing Holliday and Mayo. I believe the club prides itself on its ability to prepare Bats to be ready to stay up, etc., but I do wonder if Sig Mejdal's "leading, bleeding edge" has made substitutes for actual MLB competition less effective than they have been in recent years. As awful as this run is, I've seen some comments a big off-season is ahead, but I'm not sure I agree.     There's nothing to do next April but play the guys you've planted your flag on.      Adley, Ryan, Holliday, Gunnar, Westburg, Cowser, Mullins, Kjerstad and Mayo is I think about as set an Opening Day lineup as you can find inching towards the winter.    Tommy Pham will be available for free next summer if somebody can't play. Certainly some interesting day to day calls for however long this year's ride the club can hold on for.    Prospect growth is not linear, and it still isn't impossible Holliday or Mayo will display some in the next 2 weeks.     Mayo can take dozens of at bats a day against Hurter with easy access to the Trajekt machine at home.
    • Mullins swing in a 3-2 count at a pitch that started at his shins and just was never a strike was telling. They are pressing beyond pressing, obviously. I'm just not seeing any spark from anywhere. They look tired.
    • What a funny thread. Yes we will. Will we win in the postseason? I’d say definitely no, but we’ll make it. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...