Jump to content

Mlbtraderumors.com predicts Delgado to the O's


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It's phase two time for the Orioles. I don't see the top tier free agents signing here regardless of how much money we throw at them. Other, currently more competitive teams, will throw just as much money at them. It's time for the Oriles to take a risk on someone like Delgado, Glaus or even Thome. Getting Delgada for a one year incentive laden deal would be similar to what the A's did with Frank Thomas a few years ago. The worst that could happen is that he holds a spot in the lineup for Snyder until June. On the other hand he could provide the thirty dingers in the middle of the line-up that the O's need to contend for a playoff spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's phase two time for the Orioles. I don't see the top tier free agents signing here regardless of how much money we throw at them. Other, currently more competitive teams, will throw just as much money at them. It's time for the Oriles to take a risk on someone like Delgado, Glaus or even Thome. Getting Delgada for a one year incentive laden deal would be similar to what the A's did with Frank Thomas a few years ago. The worst that could happen is that he holds a spot in the lineup for Snyder until June. On the other hand he could provide the thirty dingers in the middle of the line-up that the O's need to contend for a playoff spot.

Same old same old.... The problem this team had is wasting money on 2nd & 3rd tier guys. The Yankees added CC, Burnett, & Tex while we added Wiggington & Hill.

This season .... per the list they add Lackey. The Sox add Bay , Scutaro, & Harden....while we add Delgado.

I know this is just speculation but if Wins really matter in 2010 we'd lose ground on the above scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's phase two time for the Orioles. I don't see the top tier free agents signing here regardless of how much money we throw at them. Other, currently more competitive teams, will throw just as much money at them. It's time for the Oriles to take a risk on someone like Delgado, Glaus or even Thome. Getting Delgada for a one year incentive laden deal would be similar to what the A's did with Frank Thomas a few years ago. The worst that could happen is that he holds a spot in the lineup for Snyder until June. On the other hand he could provide the thirty dingers in the middle of the line-up that the O's need to contend for a playoff spot.

Playoffs? Playoffs? PLAYOFFS? Did you say...PLAYOFFS??!! :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playoffs? Playoffs? PLAYOFFS? Did you say...PLAYOFFS??!! :eek:

Didn't Frank Thomas help a young Oakland A's team to the playoffs? Why not us? Certainly we would need to get more than Delgado but it would be a good start to the off season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the O's success depends on their young players. They hold the hope for the O's competing for a playoff spot. Delgado just fills a hole for a while and takes some pressure off some of the kids. He has 30 homer potential. He can bat 4th or 5th and add a presence that Scott does not have. He is an average fielder at 1B while is more then can be said for Scott.

Adding Wood and Sanchez increases that long term infield inventory. This is similar to what MacPhail has done in the outfield and pitching.

Lyon adds someone the can close, not that he necessarily will. I think Uehara gets first shot at closing. Mickolio may be a the closer of the future. And who know what Ray may do in time. Lyon just adds depth to the late and middle inning relief core and if Uehara goes out with a injury in April, Lyon can close.

Bottom line for me is the Delgado should not be seen as a savior. This team will go as far as its young takes it. A healthy Delgado just add stability for a year or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same old same old.... The problem this team had is wasting money on 2nd & 3rd tier guys. The Yankees added CC, Burnett, & Tex while we added Wiggington & Hill.

This season .... per the list they add Lackey. The Sox add Bay , Scutaro, & Harden....while we add Delgado.

I know this is just speculation but if Wins really matter in 2010 we'd lose ground on the above scenario.

It's a risk. No top tier free agent is going to sign with a team that almost lost 100 games. It didn't happen last year and it won't happen this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need pitching... without adding soem pitching, adding Delgado isn't going to make much difference.

Other then a late inning reliever I think the O's need to stay the course with their young pitchers. Matusz, Tillman, Bergesen, Arrieta, Hernandez and Berken need to get their innings . It will be hard to get a better starter then Guthrie for price. With Erbe, Britton and Johnson coming in a year of so there is enough depth for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the O's success depends on their young players. They hold the hope for the O's competing for a playoff spot. Delgado just fills a hole for a while and take some pressure off some of the kids. He has 30 homer potential. He can bat 4th or 5th and add a presence that Scott does not have. He is an average fielder at 1B while is more then can be said for Scott.

Adding Wood and Sanchez increases that long term infield inventory. This is similar to what MacPhail has done in the outfield and pitching.

Lyon add someone the can close, not that he necessarily will. I think Uehara gets first shot at closing. Mickolio may be a the closer of the future. And who know what Ray may do in time. Lyon just add depth to the late and middle inning relief core and if Uehara go out with a injury in April, Lyon can close.

Bottom line for me is the Delgado should not be seen as a savior. This team will go as far as its young takes it. A healthy Delgado just add stability for a year or two.[/QU

Succes for the Orioles next year is entirely dependent on the continued growth and success of their young starting rotation, regardless of who they get in free agency. Delgado could be an improtant piece in pushing the O's over the top. Certainly, he is not the only move the O's should make but he is a key move IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picking up Delgado would fit into MacPhail's plan because it provides a one-year stopgap to get to Snyder. Signing Delgado would allow the Orioles to trade Luke Scott and platoon Reimold and Delgado at DH while platooning Pie and Reimold in LF. It leaves the everyday first base role open but Delgado is a known quantity, especially when he is healthy.
How would that work? Delgado's a LH bat and his numbers against LH SP are not particularly great.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43. Carlos Delgado - Orioles. In Delgado, the Orioles could add a possible 30-home run bat with little risk. And Delgado could benefit from some time at DH.

Those three little words are music to MacPhail's ears. He loves those guys that are cheap mediocre options that might overachieve.

If Delgado is our "big bat," it will be just more of the same with MacPhail and the Orioles will continue to tread water and look up at the rest of the division while it improves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those three little words are music to MacPhail's ears. He loves those guys that are cheap mediocre options that might overachieve.

If Delgado is our "big bat," it will be just more of the same with MacPhail and the Orioles will continue to tread water and look up at the rest of the division while it improves.

Wieters, Jones, Reimold, Pie, Matusz, Tillman, Bergy, Arrieta, Hernandez's improve have alot more to do with how the O's will progress then who they sign this off season. Delgado will play a supporting role if he signs. The kids will make the big difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Oh, I don't know. I thought when accusing someone of wild malpractice over possibly, maybe, slightly speeding up highlights that kind of opened the door to a little goofy exaggeration.
    • I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  
    • Gunnar’s base running is in the 99th percentile.  That mess is in the 98th percentile.
    • Yeah, the highlighted section here is really why I agree that the O's will look to minimize losing players to waivers just yet. Things could blow up on them pretty quick. There's a ton of risk with these moves, but they have to find out. The best way to do that is to utilize the options for Akin and Tate, IMO. We'll see! 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...