Jump to content

Keith Law's 2010 MLB Mock Draft v1.0


Recommended Posts

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/insider/news/story?id=5214034&action=login&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fmlb%2finsider%2fnews%2fstory%3fid%3d5214034

Although its an insider article, it shows picks #1 through #5, and he has the O's picking Taillon :

There had been some word that Orioles GM Andy MacPhail wanted to take a college player after last year's first-rounder, Matt Hobgood, took a while to sign and then showed up in less-than-perfect conditioning this spring. However, the scouting department's ardor for Taillon's electric arm seems to have won out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top 3 are

Nats - Harper (no surprise here, he is absolutely mashing the ball right now)

Bucs- Machado

O's - Tallion

I'd be happy with this order, but still would love the Buc's to take Pomerantz so JJ can have his choice of Machado or Tallion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just read this on a respectable mock by AOL Fanhouse.

"Although I've heard Matt Harvey discussed in this spot, all signs still point to Taillon still landing here. Many scouts call him one of the best high school arms to emerge in recent years and the O's will not pass up a shot at him".

I remember reading somewhere about it coming from the top after hobgood to take a college player.

To me its Harper and Tallion then everything else. I feel like after those 2 you have a huge drop off.

Here is what they said about Machado to the Bucs

"Harper is a lock at No. 1, and while Machado isn't nearly to that point yet, he's becoming the heavy favorite here. They may have even begun discussing a deal, according to sources. A Scott Boras client, Machado has also pulled out of a key pre-draft event, the Florida High School Classic, something he'd clearly benefit from attending if his status wasn't already solidified. Pomeranz could push his way back into the picture here with a knockout SEC Tournament performance".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just read this on a respectable mock by AOL Fanhouse.

"Although I've heard Matt Harvey discussed in this spot, all signs still point to Taillon still landing here. Many scouts call him one of the best high school arms to emerge in recent years and the O's will not pass up a shot at him".

I remember reading somewhere about it coming from the top after hobgood to take a college player.

To me its Harper and Tallion then everything else. I feel like after those 2 you have a huge drop off.

Here is what they said about Machado to the Bucs

"Harper is a lock at No. 1, and while Machado isn't nearly to that point yet, he's becoming the heavy favorite here. They may have even begun discussing a deal, according to sources. A Scott Boras client, Machado has also pulled out of a key pre-draft event, the Florida High School Classic, something he'd clearly benefit from attending if his status wasn't already solidified. Pomeranz could push his way back into the picture here with a knockout SEC Tournament performance".

I think the Orioles grab Taillon if he's there. If the Bucs snatch him up, I think they choose between Pomeranz, Mcguire, Cox and Colon.

To me, Whitson (more so) and Machado merit serious consideration should that be the case, but I think we're looking at Taillon or a college guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you. Whitson is my favorite HS pitcher beside Tallion. I think he will make a team very happy. If we go the college route pitching I for one am hoping its Sale. Unless Pomeranz is lights out the next couple of weeks. If we go college bat im hoping for Michael Choice or Christian Colon. Choice doesnt get alot of pub around here because he is one from a smaller program and two is an OF. To me if Tallion is off the board and they decide to go the college route its comes down to Pomeranz, Sale, Choice, or Colon. Choice is a guy who is really starting to grow on me. I have been high on Sale for a couple months now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inconsistency doesn't even begin to describe...

I know he is inconsistent, but thats what you have with him, just like James Paxton. BUT, Harvey wasn't ever labeled "inconsistent" until 2009's disaster season right? I ask this because in 09 when the troubles started he was apparently mechanically throwing differently which he changed back to his old form this season and pitched much better, showing 1st round stuff again. Unless he reverted to his 09 form, he has 1st round stuff in a draft where there aren't many college arms w/ 1st round stuff. Once you get the "inconsistent" label, even if you pitch well and then have a rough outing, the label starts being unfairly thrown around again. But, I haven't even looked at what his stats are looking like right now, so I could be totally off....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know he is inconsistent, but thats what you have with him, just like James Paxton. BUT, Harvey wasn't ever labeled "inconsistent" until 2009's disaster season right? I ask this because in 09 when the troubles started he was apparently mechanically throwing differently which he changed back to his old form this season and pitched much better, showing 1st round stuff again. Unless he reverted to his 09 form, he has 1st round stuff in a draft where there aren't many college arms w/ 1st round stuff. Once you get the "inconsistent" label, even if you pitch well and then have a rough outing, the label starts being unfairly thrown around again. But, I haven't even looked at what his stats are looking like right now, so I could be totally off....

Well he was on the radar after a great Freshman season in 2008 as the Sunday starter, but needed at least a solid 2009 to keep that up. That didn't happen, 2009 was a disaster starting on weekends, and since you only have the two years to go off of, you really can't say oh, well he was great for 2-3 years, then had one bad season. He was good this season, but not GREAT. In 90 IP he had a little over 1k per IP, but also gave up a hit about .8 hits an IP too. He had 8 WP in 90IP even though he only gave up a BB ever 3IP, so not sure about the control, maybe he's getting K's on pitches out of the zone which will NOT translate at AA and above. In 13 games he avg. just about 7IP per start, including 2 CG, but Patrick Johnson almost matched his stats.

He had a great year, a bad year and a good year, I could see him going late 1st/supplemental, or just as easily slipping into the 2nd. I said it then, and I'll say it now, I REALLY don't like that we had to give up a 2nd rd pick for Gonzo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well he was on the radar after a great Freshman season in 2008 as the Sunday starter, but needed at least a solid 2009 to keep that up. That didn't happen, 2009 was a disaster starting on weekends, and since you only have the two years to go off of, you really can't say oh, well he was great for 2-3 years, then had one bad season. He was good this season, but not GREAT. In 90 IP he had a little over 1k per IP, but also gave up a hit about .8 hits an IP too. He had 8 WP in 90IP even though he only gave up a BB ever 3IP, so not sure about the control, maybe he's getting K's on pitches out of the zone which will NOT translate at AA and above. In 13 games he avg. just about 7IP per start, including 2 CG, but Patrick Johnson almost matched his stats.

He had a great year, a bad year and a good year, I could see him going late 1st/supplemental, or just as easily slipping into the 2nd. I said it then, and I'll say it now, I REALLY don't like that we had to give up a 2nd rd pick for Gonzo.

Stats aren't the issue with Harvey. I'd be curious to know of another NCAA starter consistently hitting 93 in the late innings and hitting 96s in the early innings that isn't a serious first round lock. His swings-and-misses aren't off plus breakers that are out of the zone. He throws fastballs by people and gets a crazy good GO/AO rate because of the life on his 2S and his change-up. I'll be shocked if he isn't taken by someone in the 1st Round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stats aren't the issue with Harvey. I'd be curious to know of another NCAA starter consistently hitting 93 in the late innings and hitting 96s in the early innings that isn't a serious first round lock. His swings-and-misses aren't off plus breakers that are out of the zone. He throws fastballs by people and gets a crazy good GO/AO rate because of the life on his 2S and his change-up. I'll be shocked if he isn't taken by someone in the 1st Round.

Got me, just trying to figure out what happened with him last year versus where he is this year without seeing him. Didn't realize that he was a ground ball guy either, wonder if he picked up any tips from White last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Ok so it's settled. -There's no such thing as a supervillain sports owner. -Humans are complex creatures, and can almost never be placed in the "bucket" you want to put them in. -JA has done some very good things for this franchise and should be recognized for that. -That doesn't mean fans can't be excited about the prospect of moving on to a new ownership chapter, after 3 decades of arguably more bad news than good.
    • This is dead on.  However, this situation is like having a team change its manager when it's out of the rebuild phase. Having an owner than truly doesn't need to support the family on the Orioles cash flow should be enough to get us to a level where we can have a chance to keep some of our own players for the long term. Owning an MLB team is a big boy proposition. The Angelos family just isn't in that league anymore. 
    • WTF? How did I get thrown into this? I've always given credit to John Angelos for hiring Elias as well. Why would I label you an Angelos Apologist for that?  Such an odd statement.
    • Just caught up with this thread and I have a few thoughts/comments. 1. As I stated earlier, I was told this months ago by two separate people who seemed to have good information, but were connected through several degrees of separation. I don't really pass on stuff like that anymore because there is no use starting rumors before I have real concrete info. Clearly something coming from Bloomburg holds more weight than something from Orioleshangout.com. I'm glad it hit though. 2. My thoughts are anything that removes the Angelos family from ownership has to be a netgain for Orioles fans. I will give John Angelos credit for hiring Mike Elias and turning this franchise around into something to be proud of, but his ridiculous comments and emergence in the media suddenly during a year of success showed me that an Angelos can't help but to take center stage when things are going well. It was just like when Peter Angelos came out of hibernation when the Orioles where heading to the ALCS in 2014. I was in that lockeroom and there were players and coaches going, "That's the first time I've ever seen him." 3. I've seen a lot of stuff thrown around about Bloomberg, and I certainly understand the poster on here who lost his job to his Carlyle Group being jaded, but at the end of the day, there is no Billionaire out there who is not connected with greasing palms or not associated with the federal government in some way. Once you get to that level you have to play the game. Unless you are Elon Musk and so rich and so successful that you just tell everyone who doesn't like you, including other Billionaires, to "Go F themselves." Lol... Yes, I have a man crush on him! 4. As for Bloomberg running the Orioles just to make money and thinking he will pinch pennies, I just don't see it. Billionaires have big egos and few want to own a losing team. Billionaires don't buy teams to make money. They buy professional sports team for the glory of being an owner on a team that wins the championship.  5. As for Elias, why would Bloomberg not want to keep Elias and his crew? If anything, he's more likely to pay what it will take to keep him and his crew together for many years. My biggest concern with Elias has been him suddenly realizing he will not be able to spend enough to keep his top players that he drafted, signed and developed. With Bloomberg, I can't imagine him allowing a Gunnar or Jackson Holliday to walk over money if they are still impact players. 6. Personally, this would make my Holiday season if this somehow came to fruition before the year was out. Give me a Billionaire over a guy who's done nothing but ride on his father's coattails any day. 
    • It was @Tryptaminewho posted that, and you are right that he should be acknowledged.   I was really skeptical about it because the original report (which @Tryptaminewas relaying from a Mets fan board) said the Carlyle Group was buying the team.  That’s not permissible under MLB rules.  But David Rubenstein is the co-chair and co-founder of Carlyle, so close enough!    The other part of the rumor was that the original offer was $1.1 bb but that it was raised to $1.4 bb after Peter Angelos objected to selling.   That also didn’t seem credible, since Peter appears to have not been mentally competent over the last 5 years.    In any event, we’ll see where this goes.  The original thread is here:  
    • As much as I'd not like to agree with @Billy F-Face3about a lot of things, I do agree with his above post that JA can take credit for hiring Elias...and allowing Elias to do pretty much everything he wanted to do, especially establishing an international scouting presence which is something that didn't exist under his dad. If anyone wants to be honest here (I question that sometimes) when it comes to JA, it's usually something like "Yeah, he hired Elias, whatever," and they move on to whatever issue JA has ensnared himself in at the moment, probably something like giving a stupid interview like he did time and time again throughout 2023.   But if Elias is one of the best things that's happened to this franchise, then JA needs to be recognized for hiring him.  And retaining him thus far.  Hiring and retaining good people isn't easy in any industry, especially in one like Major League Baseball.  @Bemorewinsyou can't look at the last two seasons we've had, the amount of talent we have in the system and say that he's run this franchise into the ground.  That's being intentionally obtuse. I get it, a lot of people here are hammers and all they see is nails, especially when it comes to all things Angelos.  It's easy to bash them at every given turn because they've given us a lot of material to work with over the years but with JA it hasn't all been bad.  He nailed the most important part of his stewardship of the franchise, everyone should be able to agree on that. If that makes me sound like some Angelos apologist as I'm sure @Tony-OHwill label me, well, so be it.  I've been called worse.  But I don't think I wrote any lies above. That doesn't mean I don't think that JA is a tone deaf trouser-snake cheapskate, I absolutely do think those things.  He's terrible in front of the media, a microphone and a camera are his worst enemies.  His cries about having to raise prices if they want to spend money on talent are stupid.  He does strike me as someone who was born on third base and thinks he hit a triple, which is obnoxious.  While I give him a lot of credit for hiring Elias, I am absolutely thrilled at the prospect of the Orioles being sold and the Angelos family going away like a fart in the wind.
    • You make a good point, they could sell Rubenstein minority interest with agreement to sell the majority stake when PA dies which locks this in and avoids the big capital gains estate tax charge. Bisciotti  had a similar agreement where he came in as minority owner with an agreement to buy out the Modells at a later time. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...