Jump to content

Would you: cut Lough to bring up Quentin Berry


LookitsPuck

Recommended Posts

This is entirely based on 69 plate appearances (which aren't much, I definitely think it's a SSS), but you have to wonder if the concussion symptoms are still messing with Lough. If they are, I wonder if Duquette gets creative and somehow finds a way to put him on the DL. I think it's particularly interesting that Buck sat Lough (LH) against Hughes (RHP).

So, if they CAN'T DL Lough, since he doesn't have any options remaining...would you call up Berry and cut Lough?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

No.

<iframe src='http://m.mlb.com/shared/video/embed/embed.html?content_id=32445563&topic_id=11493214&width=400&height=224&property=mlb' width='400' height='224' frameborder='0'>Your browser does not support iframes.</iframe>

He can bat 9th as long as he does this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is entirely based on 69 plate appearances (which aren't much, I definitely think it's a SSS), but you have to wonder if the concussion symptoms are still messing with Lough. If they are, I wonder if Duquette gets creative and somehow finds a way to put him on the DL. I think it's particularly interesting that Buck sat Lough (LH) against Hughes (RHP).

So, if they CAN'T DL Lough, since he doesn't have any options remaining...would you call up Berry and cut Lough?

Short answer, no.

But if he really still has concussion symptoms, why wouldn't they would just use that creativity & put him on the DL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lough is getting irregular playing time with Cruz playing a lot in LF. I have the feeling that he is the kind of hitter that needs consistent AB's to get into a groove. But, it's his speed and defense that are his main assets. He would have gotten to that ball that went over Cruz's head on Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lough is getting irregular playing time with Cruz playing a lot in LF. I have the feeling that he is the kind of hitter that needs consistent AB's to get into a groove. But, it's his speed and defense that are his main assets. He would have gotten to that ball that went over Cruz's head on Sunday.[/QUOTE]And that would have made no difference. Would he have gotten two hits like Young did? If Schoop had made a quicker feed to Hardy on the DP that didn't happen, if the umpire hadn't taken away two of the 4 K's Gonzo got in the 5th inning, maybe that would have changed things.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No for Quintin Berry batting for a 697 OPS at AAA. Its too early for that.

I might if Francisco Peguero hits the heck out of the ball when he goes on rehab later this month. And I am waiting for the O's to promote Dariel Alvarez to AAA who is absolutely tearing up AA pitching right now.

I doubt that Lough gets claimed if he is DFA'd with a 455 OPS if he continues not to hit. He probably makes in through waivers and is outrighted to AAA. He's never been outrighted before so he as to accept the assignment to AAA with the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt that Lough gets claimed if he is DFA'd with a 455 OPS if he continues not to hit. He probably makes in through waivers and is outrighted to AAA. He's never been outrighted before so he as to accept the assignment to AAA with the O's.

15 teams, including the Royals, would claim him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 teams, including the Royals, would claim him.

Doubt it. Not if they have to keep him on the 25 man roster, which they would. Its hard to justify keeping at guy with a 455 OPS on the 25 man roster.

Lough would not have made the Royals 25 man roster this year. Not after they traded for Aoki. That is why they traded him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubt it. Not if they have to keep him on the 25 man roster, which they would. Its hard to justify keeping at guy with a 455 OPS on the 25 man roster.

Not at all. When it is such an incredibly small sample size and there is reason to believe health entered in to it. He also has a track record of better production. His defense alone and his ability to play center get him a look ten places even if he is sub par offensively.

169 Craig, A STL RF 31 121 11 25 5 1 3 11 8 22 0 0 .207 .260 .339 .598

170 Swisher, N CLE 1B 31 118 13 24 8 0 2 12 16 32 0 0 .203 .294 .322 .616

171 Freese, D LAA 3B 24 84 12 17 1 0 2 8 6 27 0 0 .202 .266 .286 .552

172 Schierholtz, N CHC RF 25 94 6 19 4 0 0 10 3 25 2 1 .202 .220 .245 .465

173 Almonte, A SEA CF 27 106 10 21 5 1 1 8 6 40 3 1 .198 .248 .292 .540

174 Pinto, J MIN C 24 81 13 16 1 0 5 10 17 22 0 0 .198 .340 .395 .735

175 Cozart, Z CIN SS 29 103 5 20 5 1 1 9 4 18 0 0 .194 .239 .291 .530

175 De Aza, A CWS LF 31 103 12 20 2 1 4 12 8 23 3 2 .194 .257 .350 .606

175 Venable, W SD RF 32 103 9 20 5 1 0 2 7 34 0 1 .194 .245 .262 .508

178 Tejada, R NYM SS 27 78 4 15 2 0 0 6 14 21 0 0 .192 .315 .218 .533

179 Uggla, D ATL 2B 27 100 9 19 3 0 2 10 6 30 0 0 .190 .248 .280 .528

180 Miller, B SEA SS 25 96 9 18 4 0 3 8 3 28 0 0 .188 .228 .323 .551

181 Granderson, C NYM CF 29 104 11 18 4 0 2 12 14 31 2 0 .173 .281 .269 .550

182 Carter, C HOU 1B 28 93 10 16 7 1 4 12 13 37 0 0 .172 .278 .398 .676

183 Sandoval, P SF 3B 29 106 11 18 4 1 2 6 11 26 0 0 .170 .254 .283 .537

184 Alonso, Y SD 1B 31 104 6 17 6 0 0 6 4 13 2 1 .163 .193 .221 .414

185 Gyorko, J SD 2B 30 105 7 17 1 1 2 11 9 32 2 0 .162 .224 .248 .472

186 Santana, C CLE 3B 30 105 14 16 4 0 4 11 24 25 0 0 .152 .310 .305 .615

187 Moustakas, M KC 3B 27 93 8 14 5 0 4 12 9 20 0 0 .151 .223 .333 .557

188 Ibanez, R LAA LF 27 90 7 13 2 1 3 17 9 30 0 0 .144 .222

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at all. When it is such an incredibly small sample size and there is reason to believe health entered in to it. He also has a tack record of better production. His defense alone and his ability to play center get him a look ten places even if he is sub par offensively.

169 Craig, A STL RF 31 121 11 25 5 1 3 11 8 22 0 0 .207 .260 .339 .598

170 Swisher, N CLE 1B 31 118 13 24 8 0 2 12 16 32 0 0 .203 .294 .322 .616

171 Freese, D LAA 3B 24 84 12 17 1 0 2 8 6 27 0 0 .202 .266 .286 .552

172 Schierholtz, N CHC RF 25 94 6 19 4 0 0 10 3 25 2 1 .202 .220 .245 .465

173 Almonte, A SEA CF 27 106 10 21 5 1 1 8 6 40 3 1 .198 .248 .292 .540

174 Pinto, J MIN C 24 81 13 16 1 0 5 10 17 22 0 0 .198 .340 .395 .735

175 Cozart, Z CIN SS 29 103 5 20 5 1 1 9 4 18 0 0 .194 .239 .291 .530

175 De Aza, A CWS LF 31 103 12 20 2 1 4 12 8 23 3 2 .194 .257 .350 .606

175 Venable, W SD RF 32 103 9 20 5 1 0 2 7 34 0 1 .194 .245 .262 .508

178 Tejada, R NYM SS 27 78 4 15 2 0 0 6 14 21 0 0 .192 .315 .218 .533

179 Uggla, D ATL 2B 27 100 9 19 3 0 2 10 6 30 0 0 .190 .248 .280 .528

180 Miller, B SEA SS 25 96 9 18 4 0 3 8 3 28 0 0 .188 .228 .323 .551

181 Granderson, C NYM CF 29 104 11 18 4 0 2 12 14 31 2 0 .173 .281 .269 .550

182 Carter, C HOU 1B 28 93 10 16 7 1 4 12 13 37 0 0 .172 .278 .398 .676

183 Sandoval, P SF 3B 29 106 11 18 4 1 2 6 11 26 0 0 .170 .254 .283 .537

184 Alonso, Y SD 1B 31 104 6 17 6 0 0 6 4 13 2 1 .163 .193 .221 .414

185 Gyorko, J SD 2B 30 105 7 17 1 1 2 11 9 32 2 0 .162 .224 .248 .472

186 Santana, C CLE 3B 30 105 14 16 4 0 4 11 24 25 0 0 .152 .310 .305 .615

187 Moustakas, M KC 3B 27 93 8 14 5 0 4 12 9 20 0 0 .151 .223 .333 .557

188 Ibanez, R LAA LF 27 90 7 13 2 1 3 17 9 30 0 0 .144 .222

Well, as far as the small sample, I said its too early to DFA'd him yet. But by the first of June that excuse goes away. Lough is not an established major leaguer. And his defense alone will not keep him in the majors as anything but a defensive backup. The O's need more from him than that. When the O's play in big parks they need someone better than Cruz in left. Someone that can field and hit.

If Peguero or Alvarez tear up AAA the O's would make that move. They would DFA Lough if he is still not hitting like he is now.

Matter of fact if Nolan played well on a rehab for 20 days at AAA, the O's would take him over what Lough is offering right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, as far as the small sample, I said its too early to DFA'd him yet. But by the first of June that excuse goes away. Lough is not an established major leaguer. And his defense alone will not keep him in the majors as anything but a defensive backup. The O's need more from him than that. When the O's play in big parks they need someone better than Cruz in left. Someone that can field and hit.

If Peguero or Alvarez tear up AAA the O's would make that move. They would DFA Lough if he is still not hitting like he is now.

Matter of fact if Nolan played well on a rehab for 20 days at AAA, the O's would take him over what Lough is offering right now.

I will agree to disagree with you.

And Cruz plays a better out field than a healthy Nolan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will agree to disagree with you.

And Cruz plays a better out field than a healthy Nolan.

Cruz catches what he gets to but he does not have Nolan's speed or range. Not that Nolan is as good a Lough in the outfield. But when Nolan is hitting he is a good outfielder. He just can't stay healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • There probably was no "right" choice and absolutely no "absolutely right choice" I was on record wanting to choose Abrahms and my logic was simple, a 1:1 is a chance to pick a HOF type talent A college catcher was a safe pick and Adley is having a nice career but he is clearly not a MVP/HOF type player.
    • Agreed, Akin is pitching too well to be optioned until there’s no other choices. Tate should certainly be optioned before him. The only reason I could see Akin needing to be optioned is if BOTH Means and Irvin end up in the pen (with Bradish, Kremer and Suárez starting). That’s possibly the best 5 SP right now if they believe Suárez > Means/Irvin. In which case you really can’t have 5 lefty RP and only one RHP to go with Kimbrel and Cano. Otherwise, they should carry 4 lefty RP (with one of Means/Irvin as the long man) before optioning Akin. 
    • The answer to the question is obviously no. Now if the question was would Gunnar have been worthy #1 pick the answer seems obvious that he would have been.    But taking him where he went allowed the Orioles to maximize their draft which is what every team hopes to do.    You can argue whether Adley was the right pick but if Gunnar went first there is no way the two picks work as well for Baltimore. 
    • 1080i video is redrawn a half frame (field) at 60 times per second.  Progressive footage like 1080p is 30 whole frames per second but often converted to interlaced format for transmission. If you are doing this on an ongoing basis, here's a suggestion: download the free version of one of the numerous non-linear editors out there like Avid or DaVinci Resolve and throw the clip on a timeline for your measurement.  Manually clicking through hundreds of frames seems like it would be needlessly cumbersome not to mention slow.  
    • This. I don’t get the Akin going down talk (even though it seems more based off his option remaining than performance). Right now Akin is arguably our 4th most trusted reliever (can argue with Webb) based off his usage and his peripherals are clearly in the top 4 with Cano, Kimbrel, and Coulombe. He might not be a setup guy but he’s a solid piece to have in the middle innings.   Akin’s K-BB% is nearly double that of Baumann’s in both of their careers as relievers. He K’s more, walks less, and gets more chases and whiffs.   Keeping Baumann over Akin even for a week isn’t a move that winning teams make. Not to trash him, but Baumann is just not good, so who cares if he gets claimed? He’s not trusted at this point late in close games unless the bullpen is overused, so if you lose him and need a replacement later in the year you have Heasley, Charles, and Tate (if he gets optioned). Then you also have Wells who should be a bullpen guy when he comes back. Having the flexibility is good but keeping one of your worst relievers just because he doesn’t have an option doesn’t seem like a good way to solve a log jam. 
    • Witt had hit tool questions on draft day, and Abrams was much less of a sure thing than Adley. Based on information known at the time, we absolutely made the right choice with Adley.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...