Jump to content

Toronto without the HGH

weams

By weams
in Orioles Talk

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply
DrungoHazewood Hangout Grand Counsel

DrungoHazewood

Posted
Posted
You can't be serious. So you are driving to work, and pass a guy with blook all over his hands and shirt, you then pass someone laying on the ground with a knife in him. Are you that Johnny Cochren, that its wrong to make an assumption that maybe the guy did it? The OP had every right to make that leap. I'm sure you were one of those guys cheering Barry Bonds was getting better at an age when the best players of all time were barely hanging on at the same age. Here is the sand, please insert head.

You're the one who can't be serious. You're actually trying to win an argument by saying that a fluke or a breakout season is the same quality of evidence as a bloody guy with a knife standing over a body. Amazing. Give me 10 minutes on bb-ref and I could find you 10 out-of-nowhere seasons from players in the 1880s or 1910s. They must have had some killer 'roids left over from the Civil War.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JERSEYORIOLE Major Leaguer

JERSEYORIOLE

Posted
Posted
Yeah you gotta love the soapbox posters whose baseball careers peeked at the age of 7 in tee-ball.

99% of the time you put these soapboxers in the players shoes and they make the exact same decisions. Book it.

HAHAHA career. I never played baseball. But I am an honest person and would NEVER hide behind a union for anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
crissfan172 Hangout Grand Counsel

crissfan172

Posted
Posted
You can't be serious. So you are driving to work, and pass a guy with blook all over his hands and shirt, you then pass someone laying on the ground with a knife in him. Are you that Johnny Cochren, that its wrong to make an assumption that maybe the guy did it? The OP had every right to make that leap. I'm sure you were one of those guys cheering Barry Bonds was getting better at an age when the best players of all time were barely hanging on at the same age. Here is the sand, please insert head.

Blood on hands and shirt = evidence

Hitting home runs = suspicion

One is baseless. One is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DrungoHazewood Hangout Grand Counsel

DrungoHazewood

Posted
Posted
No, Id do it to show I was clean and I respected the game. id have nothing to hide.

Sure, and when you passed the HGH test I'd just start a website full of rumors and innuendo suggesting that you knew some ex-BALCO guys who were feeding you undetectable stuff. If you really respect the game I'm sure you'd have no problem turning your life into a bad reality show 24/7 for the next 5-6 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JERSEYORIOLE Major Leaguer

JERSEYORIOLE

Posted
Posted
You're the one who can't be serious. You're actually trying to win an argument by saying that a fluke or a breakout season is the same quality of evidence as a bloody guy with a knife standing over a body. Amazing. Give me 10 minutes on bb-ref and I could find you 10 out-of-nowhere seasons from players in the 1880s or 1910s. They must have had some killer 'roids left over from the Civil War.

So you are saying, that if a guy that averages 8 hrs a year suddenly hits 40, it doesnt enter your mind? The OP was correct and he isnt the only one that is thinking it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JERSEYORIOLE Major Leaguer

JERSEYORIOLE

Posted
Posted
Sure, and when you passed the HGH test I'd just start a website full of rumors and innuendo suggesting that you knew some ex-BALCO guys who were feeding you undetectable stuff. If you really respect the game I'm sure you'd have no problem turning your life into a bad reality show 24/7 for the next 5-6 years.

Test me daily and keep doing it until the fans are satisfied and people like the OP dont ASSUME something is up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lateralus Major Leaguer Cup of Coffee

Lateralus

Posted
Posted
And you wonder why you get neg repped.

What is the purpose of this slander?

Eh, a poster recently gave me wise advice which is to "not too much stock into rep."

So that's what I'm doing.

That said, during my brief tenure here so far I've received way more positive rep than neg rep so there ya go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Crazysilver03 Hangout Grand Counsel

Crazysilver03

Posted
Posted
Eh, a poster recently gave me wise advice which is to "not too much stock into rep."

So that's what I'm doing.

And not actually providing any insight at all. Congratulations.

The big hoopla in this thread is simply that Weams made a unbased claim like it was fact. On the OH, people generally have to provide evidence to make a reasonable claim and there is nothing to this claim, including no unsubstantiated rumors. Yes, I am sure the thought crossed peoples minds that they must have been using, but the only evidence in this thread, shows that they were a very fly-ball oriented team, which would explain the occurrence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...