Jump to content

Would you consider acquiring a stud 3rd Baseman and sending Machado back to minors?


FanSince88

Willing to send Machado to minors/bench if O's sign stud 3B?  

127 members have voted

  1. 1. Willing to send Machado to minors/bench if O's sign stud 3B?

    • No way, Machado needs to start every day next year he is a guaranteed All-Star
      123
    • Yes, send machado to the bench or minors if you're able to sign a proven 3B
      4


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply
And he had a 282 OBP last season. I would rather have a franchise level player under team control for six more seasons at short.

Which is why I said "if he's on the team". I don't have a problem with trading Hardy if they feel it's appropriate, but if he's playing for us I want him at the position he excels at, which happens to be arguably the most important position on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd really rather try to fix 2B and let Machado have 3B.

Kind of surprised at how willing people are to move Hardy off of SS. He's one of the best defenders in the league at that position. If he's on the team, that's where I want him playing.

You're right, but if Hardy's in the last year of his deal and Machado is our future at SS, I put Machado at SS rather than moving him from 3B to 2B to SS.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I strongly disagree with the idea of putting Machado at second base.

If the alternatives are (1) put Machado in the minors, or (2) put Machado at 2B, then I am in favor of (2). If the alternatives are (1) put Hardy at 2B, or (2) put Machado at 2B, I am still in favor of (2). Would I be willing to trade Hardy so Machado can move to SS? That depends on what we have going on at 2B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is why I said "if he's on the team". I don't have a problem with trading Hardy if they feel it's appropriate, but if he's playing for us I want him at the position he excels at, which happens to be arguably the most important position on the field.

Only if you consider the Catcher to be off the field.

I have stated my opinion before: I do not think that Machado can play 3B for 2 1/2 seasons then transition to SS at the MLB level. I think if the O's make him a 3B now then that is where he will stay.

I am unwilling to give up six years of Machado at SS for two years of Hardy at SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right, but if Hardy's in the last year of his deal and Machado is our future at SS, I put Machado at SS rather than moving him from 3B to 2B to SS.

Pretty sure Hardy has 2 more years on his deal. But I agree that I would not want Machado bouncing around that much. The team needs to decide what the future holds for Hardy.

I have stated my opinion before: I do not think that Machado can play 3B for 2 1/2 seasons then transition to SS at the MLB level. I think if the O's make him a 3B now then that is where he will stay.

Interesting. I have not read that opinion. What makes you think the extra time at 3rd would make it impossible for him to return to SS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have stated my opinion before: I do not think that Machado can play 3B for 2 1/2 seasons then transition to SS at the MLB level. I think if the O's make him a 3B now then that is where he will stay.

This is where we disagree. If Machado can come up to the majors with one game of experience at 3B, and excel there for two months, there is little doubt in my mind that he could play 3B in 2013-14 and then transition back to SS, where he has played many hundreds of games.

Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right, but if Hardy's in the last year of his deal and Machado is our future at SS, I put Machado at SS rather than moving him from 3B to 2B to SS.

This. Unless Hardy turns out to be a trainwreck at 2B or refuses to do it, I'd rather have him there than Machado. In fact, you might be able to do some sort of platoon-ish thing between him and Flaherty at 2B. And if Manny would regress and need to spend a little time back down at AAA to tune things up, or gets injured, Hardy could step right back to SS. I like where you're going with this. I think if you do keep Macado in the big leagues, you look to put him at SS if possible and can get a good Hedaley-type replacement at 3B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure Hardy has 2 more years on his deal. But I agree that I would not want Machado bouncing around that much. The team needs to decide what the future holds for Hardy.

Interesting. I have not read that opinion. What makes you think the extra time at 3rd would make it impossible for him to return to SS?

The fact that a number of experts feel he will outgrow the SS position.

I think if he goes into two offseasons with the goal of preparing to be a third baseman he will bulk up to the extent that he would be unable to play shortstop at a high level.

As Frobby said in his post

Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that a number of experts feel he will outgrow the SS position.

I think if he goes into two offseasons with the goal of preparing to be a third baseman he will bulk up to the extent that he would be unable to play shortstop at a high level.

As Frobby said in his post

Just my opinion.

Fair enough. Really no way to support or refute it, but certainly makes me understand where you're coming from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • This is it right here. The ideal scenario. 
    • Definitely don't want Soto back.  I'm on the fence w/ Dominguez. I guess he's a fine hedge in the event that Felix isn't effective from the jump.  I don't want Rogers on this roster. As said before, I want an open competition for the 5th spot between Suarez, Povich, McDermott, Rogers. If Suarez doesn't make the rotation, he goes into the bullpen. Povich/McDermott/Rogers all have options. If I had it my way, here's what the 13 pitcher breakdown would be: SP1: Free Agent Signing (Snell, Burnes, Fried, etc.) SP2: Eflin SP3: Grayson SP4: Kremer SP5: Free Agent Signing and/or competition w/ Suarez, McDermott, Rogers, Povich Closer: Felix High Leverage: Coulombe High Leverage: Free Agent Signing Middle Reliever: Free Agent Signing *or* Dominguez Middle Reliever: Cano Middle Reliever: Webb Middle Reliever: Akin Middle/Long Reliever: Suarez I'd like to see this club sign a SP1, SP5, a high leverage arm and a reliable middle reliever type..
    • Have you not noticed, Frobby is not among us and I don't blame him one bit. Has been absent since last Wednesday evening.  By the way, I long lost track of any point and particularly relevance this discussion has to Burnes and 400 million.  Seems we are revisiting a lot of he should have - they could of - why can't we now. Great tangent though! Again, for the record, I believe no one is going to give Burnes anything close to 400 million. So my answer to the OP is again - No One!!!!
    • This posts wreaks of someone who has no idea what the cost of relievers are nowadays. Which is, of course, no surprise that you aren’t informed. Now that said, I don’t have an issue if you take someone out..I asked that very question. Who do you take out or what do you not acquire in favor of keeping Suarez?
    • You always have room for another high leverage guy.  And Akin has an option left according to FG.
    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...