Jump to content

Josh Hamilton market update - 3 years $60-75 million


TradeAngelos

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 578
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I agree with you, but I'm not sure why. There was no way he was coming here.

And I, for one, am happy he isn't. But people will whine and insist that we are doomed, just like they do every time a big name, overpriced player goes elsewhere. Meanwhile, we made the playoffs with a team that almost everyone insisted was doomed in December last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep the attacks coming!!

I think it is hilarious that you all think there are only THREE people on this board that agree with us.

Now THAT is a funny!!

Keep thinking we are "the lone stragglers" who isn't happy with the owner.

Nothing could be further from the truth, but keep living in your little delusional world where the majority is happy with this team after last year.

Based on the link to the poll where posters stated their max offer to Hamilton, of 143 members, only Decap, lookinup, and NJOriolesFan would have offered more than 5/$125 million to Hamilton. Three other posters would have offered $1 more than the next highest team, and didn't say what their max years would have been. So 6 out of 143 posters thought we should have offered Hamilton more money. You are in the majority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sad, very disturbing thing is you are actually serious.

I think you need to separate two ideas here. It is possible to be happy with the team while realize need for improvement. This team won 93 games and made the playoffs, that was something to be happy about. It is also possible to see that we need to improve on a few things to avoid regressing.

One thing I don't get, is this idea that those who are happy about the team's success last year are looked at as delusional. I'm not referring you your post in particular, mind you, but numerous that I have seen. My absolute favorite post is "let's be realistic, the 2012 Orioles were an 82 win team." No, they won 93 games. That REALLY happened. Back-of-the-napkin math, which is all pythag really is, is a nice thing to look at for discussion, but it isn't being any more "realistic" and saying that this team won 93 games last year is in no way being "delusional."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This, ladies and gentleman, is one of the reason why people with under 500 posts make posts about how they get no respect from people that have been here, because at some point somebody in the same boat gave all of them a bad name by making posts like these, and consequently, some people become skeptical of them from there on out.

Hamilton wasn't coming here, the Orioles would have been stupid to give him five years and bid against themselves. Need is not an excuse to act stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on the link to the poll where posters stated their max offer to Hamilton, of 143 members, only Decap, lookinup, and NJOriolesFan would have offered more than 5/$125 million to Hamilton. Three other posters would have offered $1 more than the next highest team, and didn't say what their max years would have been. So 6 out of 143 posters thought we should have offered Hamilton more money. You are in the majority.

Did the Orioles even make an offer? If not, thats pointless. I said all along i'd go 5/125, if more then pass. I'm more upset that we never had an interest. If it comes out we we're in it until the end, fine. If no interest was even shown, that's where my problem is. You still can't say for sure, that Hamilton would have turned down a 4/100 + a 25M option, if it was made at the winter meetings. Especially with Texas and Seattle only willing to go 3/4 in the 15/20M per year range. Unless the Angels had a handshake type deal with Hamilton's agent, in the possibility they lost out on Grienke. Who knows. It's all moot now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Angelos did fight the relocation.  He voted against, lobbied against it, withheld permission to adjust TV territories, and threatened to sue if not fairly compensated.  As long as the team was compensated for the loss of broadcast exclusivity, I don’t think he had any other case. From all reports, he drove a hard bargain and it took like 9 months to negotiate a compensation and settlement agreement. There was a wide discrepancy among various parties about what constituted just compensation with Angelos taking more pessimistic views of the impact of the Nats franchise and less optimistic view on MASN. Also, MASN was in perpetuity not temporary.  In hindsight, MASN probably didn’t provide the revenue protection intended because of how the dispute played out and how the RSN market collapsed, but that’s in hindsight. Overall, Angelos “won” the MASN dispute (at least the RSDC process) more than he lost it - the Nationals advocated for rights fees intentionally designed to bankrupt MASN but the RSDC didn’t use their comps. Overall, I think it’s fair to say that relocating a team to DC has hurt the Baltimore club’s market size and ability to fund a top-10 payroll.   HOWEVER, had the Nats not come to DC, the specter of an Orioles relocation to DC would have been hanging over our heads especially as Peter’s health declined, the stadium aged, and the lease approached. Peter would never have moved, but are we sure JA would turn down a higher offer of say $2.3BN offer from Ted Leonsis or someone with the intent to move the club to DC? I think as an Orioles fan it’s probably best to have another team in DC than have to worry about the Orioles ever relocating there.
    • Everything revolves around the health of the player. I think Gunnar has more. I think the collision with Mateo set Gunnar back and affected him in ways we will never know. I'm no mind specialist but Gunnar is young plays all out, and that had to bother him. I've watched that collision a number of times. No fault - just two players going all out and one is finished for the year. It just so happened that Gunnar got the yips and his batting went south soon thereafter. Maybe a coincidence but I think we will see a rejuvenated Gunnar next year and all stops are off. 
    • I’m not so sure the bolded part is true. I think a lot of that last bit can have to do with small skills: situational hitting/running, above average play in close games, generally things that can be boiled down to “luck.” I didn’t see this years team as having a major talent discrepancy from the 2023 version.
    • As great as Gunnar is can’t assume he matches last year. That said I like the odds of the team as a whole matching what we did. 
    • The real improvement of this team will come from within.    The 3-5 players they bring in from outside the org will supplement the roster…maybe put it over the top but the real improvement will come from those already in the org.
    • Yeah. -Would love to keep Burnes but I seriously doubt it. -I have a lot of faith in Adley.  - Holliday has huge ceiling even if he isn’t ready to be elite.  - doesn’t always work this way but the better your closer is tends to help rest of pen 
    • Nice OP. Thanks for the effort. Like the chart. Surprised it hasn't received much response. You sum up a lot of what I hope for as well. I'd add: I think a full - healty year of Westy will be even more valuable. I think Gunnar has even more in the tank. I want - hope that Holliday can develop into the lead off hitter and OBP table setter we need. And, I so want Cowser to cut down on strike outs and continue to develop as a professional hitter. I think he has the potential to cover for the loss of Santander while Big K develops on the right side. A lot to hope for but I believe these youngsters have a lot of potential yet to tap. And oh yes - I want Mayo to make Roy and all of us proud! Thanks again for the effort! I look at pitching as if we have a base. I agree with your points 1 and 2.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...