Jump to content

Is Chen injured?


Dark Helmet

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Incorrect. Wada went on the 15-day DL retroactive to March 22nd (link). That means he could come off the 60-day DL on May 21st.

I have found a reference to allowing a player to be put on the emergency disabled list (60 day) during ST so I think you are correct. I am actually surprised teams don't abuse this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Options

At Bowie

Eddie Gamboa 0-3 4.14 7 7 0 0 0 41.1 40 26 19 4 5 11 32 1.23 0 0

Kevin Gausman 1-4 3.35 7 7 0 0 0 40.1 40 20 15 3 3 4 39 1.09 0 0

Mike Wright 4-0 4.33 7 7 0 0 0 35.1 41 20 17 1 2 12 30 1.50 0 0

Jake Pettit 2-0 3.86 6 6 0 0 0 35.0 29 17 15 3 2 13 23 1.20 0 0

Devin Jones 0-2 6.12 5 5 0 0 0 25.0 32 23 17 2 1 10 19 1.68 0 0

At Norfolk

Jair Jurrjens 4-1 2.62 7 7 0 0 0 44.2 37 14 13 1 0 15 29 1.16 0 0

Freddy Garcia4-0 2.67 5 5 0 0 0 33.2 31 11 10 4 0 2 21 0.98 0 0

Josh Stinson1-1 4.11 5 5 0 0 0 30.2 33 17 14 3 0 12 17 1.47 0 0

Zach Clark 1-2 4.56 5 5 0 0 0 25.2 30 19 13 1 1 7 20 1.44 0 0

Zach Britton1-1 3.38 5 5 0 0 0 24.0 28 12 9 0 1 12 15 1.67 0 0

Jake Arrieta 2-1 2.75 3 3 0 0 0 19.2 16 7 6 1 0 3 17 0.97 0 0

Steve Johnson1-1 4.41 3 3 0 0 0 16.1 17 8 8 2 0 4 19 1.29 0 0

Freddy is up, Arrieta, Britton and Steve are not ready, Zach and Stinson doesn't have it. That leaves JJ and KG as the only viable options ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6.1 Ip, 5 H, 1R, 1ER, 3BB, 6K

gets the win to improve to 3-4

I didn't want DD to sign Saunders, I thought the plan was to sign someone better than Saunders.... but when it became clear that wasn't going to happen I thought it was a no brainer to sign Saunders for depth.

Saunders would be the worst pitcher on the team right now. He has more losses than any pitcher on this team. And his losses have been blowouts. His three worst losses would be the worst three performances by any of the Orioles starters. Sure he has a gem here and there but he has clunkers a lot as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say give Steve Johnson another start. Other than that, I would rather see Arietta or Britton next. Both are major league starters. The problem I see with those two, however is the team is too good for them to work through their inconsistencies up here. Instead, you send them back to the minors..and it wrecks their confidence. I mean, if you are Arietta, and and mentally soft anyway...it has to not make things better to see Steve Johnson and Freddy Garcia get the call before you...while the supposed ace Hammel constantly stinks it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arietta had to be scratched from his start today, so I guess he's out of the running. I'm leery of Jurrjens' peripherals--K/BB isn't great, lots of flyballs plays well in Harbor Park but not so much in Camden Yards. I don't know what scouts are saying about Jurrjens' stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arietta had to be scratched from his start today, so I guess he's out of the running. I'm leery of Jurrjens' peripherals--K/BB isn't great, lots of flyballs plays well in Harbor Park but not so much in Camden Yards. I don't know what scouts are saying about Jurrjens' stuff.

Still, he's probably the best option for now. I'd rather give him 2 or 3 starts while waiting for Wada to be ready than rush Gausman up here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saunders would be the worst pitcher on the team right now. He has more losses than any pitcher on this team. And his losses have been blowouts. His three worst losses would be the worst three performances by any of the Orioles starters. Sure he has a gem here and there but he has clunkers a lot as well.

Yeah... that's why Buck chose him to start the wild card game and in the ALDS... because he think he thought he was terrible.

Talk about being a homer. Saunders will provide more innings, earn more wins and have a lower ERA than whatever combination of #5 starters the Orioles come up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah... that's why Buck chose him to start the wild card game and in the ALDS... because he think he thought he was terrible.

Talk about being a homer. Saunders will provide more innings, earn more wins and have a lower ERA than whatever combination of #5 starters the Orioles come up with.

Way to grasp at two starts to ignore the realities of what he is doing right now. Right now, he is awful outside of home, a strong pitchers park. Pitching the way he is right now, in Camden Yards and other ballparks of the AL East, people on here wouldn't be able to get rid of him fast enough, and nobody would be happy having spent $6 million for production like that out of a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah... that's why Buck chose him to start the wild card game and in the ALDS... because he think he thought he was terrible.

Talk about being a homer. Saunders will provide more innings, earn more wins and have a lower ERA than whatever combination of #5 starters the Orioles come up with.

Ehhh, maybe?

The thing about it is this: the Orioles signed a bunch of depth and had extra options that would be available during the season: Johnson, Jurrjens, Garcia, Gausman, Wada not to mention the likes of Arrieta, Britton, etc.

Right now Saunders has a 5.51 ERA with a 1.521 (the highest of his career) WHIP. His SO/9 is 3.8...easily the worst of his career. His walk rate is the worst of his career at 3.4. His H/9 is nearly the worst of his career at 10.3. The only redeeming factor Saunders has going for him is he's pitching at Safeco.

So, the question came down to whether or not Duquette thought Saunders would be as good or better than the options I listed above AND whether or not he'd be worth the $6 million in the process.

It's not as slum dunk as you make it out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ehhh, maybe?

The thing about it is this: the Oriole signed a bunch of depth and had extra options that would be available during the season: Johnson, Jurrjens, Garcia, Gausman, Wada not to mention the likes of Arrieta, Britton, etc.

Right now Saunders has a 5.51 ERA with a 1.521 (the highest of his career). His SO/9 is 3.8...easily the worst of his career. His walk rate is the wrost of his career at 3.4. His H/9 is nearly the worst of his career at 10.3. The only redeeming factor Saunders has going for him is he's pitching at Safeco.

So, the question came down to whether or not Duquette thought Saunders would be as good or better than the options I listed above AND whether or not he'd be worth the $6 million in the process.

It's not as slum dunk as you make it out to be.

Agreed. Saunders has not been very good overall this year. He can give you some innings, but the Orioles should be able to get those innings covered with depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah... that's why Buck chose him to start the wild card game and in the ALDS... because he think he thought he was terrible.

Talk about being a homer. Saunders will provide more innings, earn more wins and have a lower ERA than whatever combination of #5 starters the Orioles come up with.

You must not understand the definition of the word homer. Everything in my post is factual evidence from this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must not understand the definition of the word homer. Everything in my post is factual evidence from this year.

You throw out the guy's entire career to make a point about one month of stats... then you throw out his stats in his home park, 1/2 his starts to further your point.

Saunders has a long track record, he has pitched well in other parks besides Safeco.. he will provide a roughly league average starter.

As I said I wanted DD to sign someone better than Saunders... but Saunders should have been the minimum as the O's rotation had almost no long term track record coming into this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You throw out the guy's entire career to make a point about one month of stats... then you throw out his stats in his home park, 1/2 his starts to further your point.

Saunders has a long track record, he has pitched well in other parks besides Safeco.. he will provide a roughly league average starter.

The problem is that the Safeco argument is a very valid one. You're right, he's pitched well in other parks before. So have many pitchers. He's on the wrong side of 30 with marginal stuff. Doesn't mean he's doomed, but the bottom line is that he's been quite poor this year.

I think it will be interesting to see the final numbers. Saunders right now is a 3-4 with a 5.51. O's 5th starters, as a quick calculation, are 1-4 with a 7.03. I think the O's group has a much better chance to improve significantly on those numbers. We'll just have to wait and see though.

For the record I would not have been opposed to the O's signing Saunders. But after seeing what he's done so far this year I am glad they didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I don’t think it was weird at all.  EDC said it but I thought it unfolded as expected.  You knew the QBs would go. You knew tons of OT and WR would go.   This was always going to be an offense dominated first round. The Oline and WR depth is in every round. I suspect that they go Oline twice or Oline/WR tonight.  Obviously you never know how the board falls but I think that’s what is likely.   This is mainly going to be an offense draft. EDC said a few weeks ago that they will draft a RB.  My guess is that the RB goes sometime in day 3. They will come out of this draft with at least 2 more Olineman, one WR and one RB.  I suspect they take a safety at some point as well. The question will be do they take 9 players.  The Ravens didn’t feel this was a draft with as many draftable players as years past, so I wouldn’t be surprised if they make some kind of a trade. 
    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...