Jump to content

Johnson Part of the Core


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

Strangely and against my better judgment I'm beginning to think the payroll just might go up. This could be one indication, the fact that in the scheme of things they feel they can afford JJ. They know what we need to upgrade. If they feel they need a top CL to be in it next season, it may be because they intend to add a few major pieces. IMO JJ would have been the best piece to move if you wanted to free up salary.

I feel strongly that payroll goes up, I just don't think it is going to go up significantly. If OD payroll is set at 105 million then I don't see room for Johnson at 8 million +.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 238
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Strangely and against my better judgment I'm beginning to think the payroll just might go up. This could be one indication, the fact that in the scheme of things they feel they can afford JJ. They know what we need to upgrade. If they feel they need a top CL to be in it next season, it may be because they intend to add a few major pieces. IMO JJ would have been the best piece to move if you wanted to free up salary.

Well, like every team in MLB, they have an extra $25 mm in extra TV money to play with, and the 250,000 increase in paid attendance should have brought in another extra $10 mm or so. So, ignoring whatever is behind the MASN black curtain, the O's probably could raise payroll by $35 mm if they wanted to. I doubt they will raise it my that much, or even close, but $15-20 mm would not surprise me. However, some of that will go to raises for existing players, possibly including some long term contracts. I'm not expecting them to go out and sign several top-end free agents. I think the new TV money will cause the FA market to be way overheated with so-so players getting contracts that are too big and too long, and the O's would be wise not to get into that feeding frenzy but concentrate on locking up their own guys who they want to keep long-term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, like every team in MLB, they have an extra $25 mm in extra TV money to play with, and the 250,000 increase in paid attendance should have brought in another extra $10 mm or so. So, ignoring whatever is behind the MASN black curtain, the O's probably could raise payroll by $35 mm if they wanted to. I doubt they will raise it my that much, or even close, but $15-20 mm would not surprise me. However, some of that will go to raises for existing players, possibly including some long term contracts. I'm not expecting them to go out and sign several top-end free agents. I think the new TV money will cause the FA market to be way overheated with so-so players getting contracts that are too big and too long, and the O's would be wise not to get into that feeding frenzy but concentrate on locking up their own guys who they want to keep long-term.

I expect OD payroll and total payroll to be separate entities again this season. DD is going to want to leave some room for taking on salary as the season progresses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top SD% with over 30 tries

1. Holland      91.1%2. Benoit       90.9%3. Nathan       90.7%4. Kimbrel      88.6%5. Robertson    88.4%6. Balfour      86.8%7. Melancon     86.7%8. Mujica       86.5%9. Uehara       85.4%10. Janssen     85.4%...31. Johnson     76.0%

.

For context, I count 73 pitchers with at least 30 tries, so JJ's shutdown percentage was above average though not spectacular. Here's how JJ compares to other Orioles:

Johnson 76% (38-12)

O'Day 75% (27-9)

Hunter 69% (22-10)

Matusz 68% (15-7)

Patton 47% (8-9)

McFarland 47% (7-8)

So, JJ was the best we had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect OD payroll and total payroll to be separate entities again this season. DD is going to want to leave some room for taking on salary as the season progresses.

True. So, for apples to apples, I expect OD payroll in 2014 to be higher than OD payroll in 2013. Whether total payroll is higher in 2014 than 2013 will depend in part on whether we're in the race.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, like every team in MLB, they have an extra $25 mm in extra TV money to play with, and the 250,000 increase in paid attendance should have brought in another extra $10 mm or so. So, ignoring whatever is behind the MASN black curtain, the O's probably could raise payroll by $35 mm if they wanted to. I doubt they will raise it my that much, or even close, but $15-20 mm would not surprise me. However, some of that will go to raises for existing players, possibly including some long term contracts. I'm not expecting them to go out and sign several top-end free agents. I think the new TV money will cause the FA market to be way overheated with so-so players getting contracts that are too big and too long, and the O's would be wise not to get into that feeding frenzy but concentrate on locking up their own guys who they want to keep long-term.
The payroll with raises and arbitration included will come to about 90M. As to extensions I think it is doubtful we will see more than one, probably none. Not because they won't try, but because the 3 players involved, Manny, Davis and Wieters aren't interested.

So it is possible a goodly portion of the extra 20-30 M could go to acquisitions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The payroll woith raises and arbitration included will come to about 90M. As to extensions I think it is doubtful we will see more than one, probably none. Not because they won't try, but because the 3 players involved, Manny, Davis and Wieters aren't interested.

So it is possible a goodly portion of the extra 20-30 M could go to acquisitions.

How do you know those three players aren't interested? And wasn't it the team that didn't want to approach Wieters?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you know those three players aren't interested? And wasn't it the team that didn't want to approach Wieters?
I don't think it is certain they aren't interested. I suspect because of who their agents are: Boras and Lozano, that they won't be. I see a possibility of one of Wieters or Manny, but only a slim one. IIRC the team said Wieters wasn't interested.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well El Gordo is full of BS. There is a fresh article today talking about how Davis is eager to sign an extension.

Care to post a link? A lot of people have trouble reading and interpreting things around here, so I would prefer to read it for myself. And I thank you for your kind words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as I thought. Asked if he wanted to extend, instead of saying yes he goes on about how he loves the colors orange and black and wearing them someday (not necessarily the Orioles) and then says,"This place has just been, I’ve had so many good memories in two years, you know I’d love to extend that(good memories) for a number of years.” That isn't the same as what the tweet says. I seem to remember TEX waxing poetic about what a dream it would be to play in B'more. Not to say Chris is a douche like TEX, but that an extension is his agent's department, and he understandably needs to be circumspect in his answers. Of course he would love to stay in B'more, and if the O's offer him the 5/100+M the MFY or TEX do, then maybe he will. I stand by my original assumption that the O's wont offer enough to convince Boras to advise him to extend.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as I thought. Asked if he wanted to extend, instead of saying yeas he goes on about how he loves the colors orange and black and wearing them someday (not necessarily the Orioles) and then says,"This place has just been, I’ve had so many good memories in two years, you know I’d love to extend that(good memories) for a number of years.” That isn't the same as what the tweet says. I seem to remember TEX waxing poetic about what a dream it would be to play in B'more. Not to say Chris is a douche like TEX, but that an extension is his agent's department, and he understandably needs to be circumspect in his answers. Of course he would love to stay in B'more, and if the O's offer him the 5/100+M the MFY or TEX do, then maybe he will. I stand by my original assumption that the O's wont offer enough to convince Boras to advise him to extend.

I agree with Gordo, this isn't a firm declaration that he intends to stay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Gametime:  4:05 pm Forecast:  MId 50s to low 60s, cloudy, chance of rain Promotion:  Brandon Hyde Bobblehead, gates open early and music on Eutaw Street Matchup:  JP Sears (L) vs Cole Irvin (L) Lineups Later -- I will not be around, someone else will have to add them  
    • If you "reconstruct the inning without the errors" that means you replay the inning without the ghost runner.   So on that ground ball that got the runner at the plate, you now assume Langeliers would have been thrown out at first.
    • So I looked up the rule book and I can't find anything that says this is the case. Maybe I'm missing it because the rules for unearned runs can be convuluted to say the least. "For purposes of calculating earned runs under Rule 9.16, the runner who begins an inning on second base pursuant to this rule shall be deemed to be a runner who has reached second base because of a fielding error, but no error shall be charged to the opposing team or to any player. For purposes of Rule 9.02, the Official Scorer shall keep records of the number of times each batter and runner is placed at second base in accordance with this rule." In the rulebook under unearned runs it states, "An earned run is a run for which a pitcher is held accountable. In determining earned runs, the Official Scorer shall reconstruct the inning without the errors (which exclude catcher’s interference) and passed balls, giving the benefit of the doubt always to the pitcher in determining which bases would have been reached by runners had there been errorless play. For the purpose of determining earned runs, an intentional base on balls, regardless of the circumstances, shall be construed in exactly the same manner as any other base on balls. (a)  The Official Scorer shall charge an earned run against a pitcher every time a runner reaches home base by the aid of safe hits, sacrifice bunts, a sacrifice fly, stolen bases, putouts, fielder’s choices, bases on balls, hit batters, balks or wild pitches (including a wild pitch on third strike that permits a batter to reach first base) before fielding chances have been offered to put out the offensive team. For the purpose of this rule, a defensive interference penalty shall be construed as a fielding chance. A wild pitch is solely the pitcher’s fault and shall contribute to an earned run just as a base on balls or a balk." I don't see where it states a batter that reaches on a fielder's choice due to a runner being being on due to error.   
    • Joe Posnanski wrote a wonderful book, called “The Baseball 100,” his 100 greatest players. It’s full of wonderful quotes, but it leaves out a quote that is not just all of Baseball in three words, but that applies to all of life. ”Sometimes you suck.” Adam Jones. God bless Adam Jones. Yes, Hyde makes boneheaded decisions almost every game. Yes Mike should have done this or not done that, Yes Cowser shouldn’t have thrown that way, Ryan shouldn’t have missed the fly, yada yada. I was screaming as loud as anyone. My wife said,”I thought you liked baseball,” But now it’s tomorrow.  “Sometimes you suck.” Charge on.
    • Game 4 of Yankees series. It’s one game, but one game could be the difference in the division, having to play in the WC series, and home field advantage.  Things to consider…  How did games 1-3 go versus the NYY?  Should we ease Bradish back in a lower pressure spot so he’s not too amped up for his own good? Do we play matchups and go with a LH SP in OPACY? What happens in Irvin’s start today?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...