Jump to content

Feldman to the Astros


biggrthngibbons

Recommended Posts

Their TV deal is a big mess. Still have money though.

After losing an MLB-worst 107 games in 2012, the Astros are looking for a new beginning with their move to the American League this year. A turnaround on the field is unlikely this year with a rock bottom payroll of $25 million. The Astros will have the resources to compete thanks to its new television deal with Comcast SportsNet Houston, a regional television network in which the Astros hold a 46% stake. The team will receive an average of $80 million a year in rights fees over the next 20 years in a deal that starts in 2013. Last season new owner Jim Crane unveiled a number of fan-friendly changes, including cheaper beer prices and allowing fans to bring food and drinks into the stadium. Management has also been meeting with season ticket holders to see what changes they would like. In 2012, season-ticket holders received a 5% discount card they can use throughout the season. The discount didn't help as the Astros finished with the third-lowest average home attendance in baseball (19,848).

http://www.forbes.com/teams/houston-astros/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I agree 100 percent. Good for Feldman, but it would be financially irresponsible for the Orioles to match this deal. You're right, we have young talemt knocking at the door and there are better short term options IMO as well.

I agree with everyone that all of these moves are ridiculous and these teams are crazy for paying these types of contracts.

That said, to play devil's advocate, that's the price of poker my friends. If the Orioles are unwilling to ante up, they might as well stay out of the poker game. If Peter is gonna play the "these prices are out of control" card, then it really, truly, is time for his to sell the team, because that's the price of business in 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, we really don't. Remember what your mother asked you about your friends jumping off a cliff? :) We've got to believe that at least one of Bundy/Gausman/ERod will be ready within 2 years. Paying Feldman $10 million per for 3 years simply doesn't make sense. Much better to "settle" for a Saunders type as a placeholder at 1/ $4 or $5, IMO.

Just about every free agent signing I've seen this offseason seems like one that the team will regret, and soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After losing an MLB-worst 107 games in 2012, the Astros are looking for a new beginning with their move to the American League this year. A turnaround on the field is unlikely this year with a rock bottom payroll of $25 million. The Astros will have the resources to compete thanks to its new television deal with Comcast SportsNet Houston, a regional television network in which the Astros hold a 46% stake. The team will receive an average of $80 million a year in rights fees over the next 20 years in a deal that starts in 2013. Last season new owner Jim Crane unveiled a number of fan-friendly changes, including cheaper beer prices and allowing fans to bring food and drinks into the stadium. Management has also been meeting with season ticket holders to see what changes they would like. In 2012, season-ticket holders received a 5% discount card they can use throughout the season. The discount didn't help as the Astros finished with the third-lowest average home attendance in baseball (19,848).

http://www.forbes.com/teams/houston-astros/

It is like I said a big mess, current owner suing ex owner. The team is losing millions.

http://mweb.cbssports.com/mlb/eye-on-baseball/24270603/astros-owner-jim-crane-sues-former-owner-drayton-mclane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I liked Scott Feldman. I thought he stabilized the back end of the rotation that had a gaping hole in it from the get go last season, and I would have liked to have kept him. However, you don't give $10 million a year to back of the rotation guys that you're going to be looking to transition out of the way for somebody else (hopefully) before his deal is up. The Astros had to make that deal, but keep in mind Feldman will be asked to pitch more as a number two or three guy and be overexposed. Even on the Orioles that wouldn't have happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we can close the books on the Feldman trade

The O's got 2 months of a mediocre pitcher in a futile playoff run

The Cubs got their closer and #5 starter, and I have projected 35 saves for Strop and 15 wins for Arietta.

and the Astros pick up Feldman for a reasonable (in 2014) 3yrs/30 million.

I remember how everyone defended the rental assuming the O's would probably bring back Feldman.

Giving up two pitchers with multiple years of big league experience who were cost controlled, throw in the mid to high 90's, was way too much for a two month rental of a guy you apparently didn't even like very much.

DD has been fleeced in every deal he has made

He was even fleeced today signing a non-tendered pitcher to a deal 50% above his arb value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with everyone that all of these moves are ridiculous and these teams are crazy for paying these types of contracts.

That said, to play devil's advocate, that's the price of poker my friends. If the Orioles are unwilling to ante up, they might as well stay out of the poker game. If Peter is gonna play the "these prices are out of control" card, then it really, truly, is time for his to sell the team, because that's the price of business in 2014.

That's a great point, but I still do not give Feldman that deal, he's just not that good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good i didn't want him. That is way to much money.

3 years is a little much for Feldman....agreed. But as a reminder...it isn't really your money. However, there has been lots of "your money" that hasn't been spent over the last 15 or so years earning interest and used for leverage on other real estate investments of Mr. Angelos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I think it’s white people problems to worry about the inconsistent quality of the Negro Leagues. The black ball players lived with a far more consistent worse. Seems a minor reconciliation to combine the stats.
    • Yes, he'll be in the Hall.  He will be looked at one of the better hitters of his era.   I also think the whole WAR argument about certain players is silly, it's certainly silly against Soto.  Like, no one wants to watch Juan Soto because he's a great defender.  No one advertises that as part of his game, no one pretends he is a great defender...so why's that held against him, exactly?  Because WAR?  "Oh, WAR says he's not a great defender, he doesn't bring enough value with the glove so he's not as valuable as this guy and wah wah wah, whine, whine whine..." It's such a lazy argument that doesn't tell the whole story, that Juan Soto hit for a 1.178 OPS in the World Series at 20 years old.  It doesn't tell the whole story that he's one of the brightest, youngest stars in a game that desperately needs bright young stars and still can't figure out how to market them.  WAR doesn't tell the whole story for a guy like Soto just like it didn't for a guy like Ichiro, just like it didn't for Tony Gwynn.  Does anyone want to tell me that Tony Gwynn's greatness and brilliance can simply be boiled down to 69.2 with a straight face? That brings me to Jeter which...I mean, cry about it a little harder, guys.  Near unanimous selection to the Hall of Fame, really?  Yes, Yankees fans still think he was a great defender because jump throws are impressive...everyone else knows he wasn't.  That's our privilege and their delusion. But everyone here also knows that a Hall of Fame vote is an emotional one and that, like it or not, Derek Jeter was one of the prime faces of the MLB during his career in the way that someone like Barry Larkin never was.  It's not Jeter's fault that the Reds aren't the Yankees and that the Reds only won 1 World Series during Larkin's career compared to what Jeter was a part of.   But that's how the cookie crumbles sometimes.
    • If the Yankees move him to SS, he'll be heralded as one of the all time great SS as long as he can make some theatrical dives for the ball.
    • BB-ref did it briefly, then switched back.  I have mixed feelings about it TBH, because I think the overall quality of the Negro Leagues varied a lot from one time period to another, more so than in the majors.   But I’m not a keen student of the Negro Leagues so I’ll leave it to baseball history scholars to debate. 
    • Retirement is the best call he’s made in years. He finally got one right. Way to go, Angel!
    • I was really unhappy with the first two innings but I was pleased to see how he responded to the adversity.  In past games he might have let that snowball.  Instead, he dominated those last four innings.  In fact, I was a little disappointed that Hyde didn’t send him out for the 7th inning, sitting on 90 pitches. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...