Jump to content

(Almost) All Things Manny Machado....


EagleOriole

Recommended Posts

On 8/1/2017 at 10:38 AM, webbrick2010 said:

Woo Hoo, give him a 10/400 contract, get that bust ready for the HOF. In Manny's good month he had a .869 OPS.

There are 41 MLB players with a higher OPS for the season!

Hmmm, I notice you've been pretty quiet on this subject lately after haranguing Manny for 3+ months.    

I've watched Orioles baseball for more than 50 years.    I will say unequivocally that Manny is one of the five best players who have ever played for this team.     Three are in the Hall of Fame, and the fourth guy (Mussina) should be.      

It'll be a crime if he leaves.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's gonna hurt me sooo much if I have to watch him play for the NYY or the Dodgers or (insert team with 300m dollars to spend.)  But there's this black cloud over my head that keeps saying next year will be his last year in Orange.

I'm so conflicted when I watch how awesome he's been in the second half thus far.  I'm fully prepared for him to walk in FA, and the thought absolutely kills me.  Not sure how I'd be able to proceed as a fan with that level of ineptitude. 

I know this has been said 100,000 times on these message boards, but we need a resolution to this potential disaster this winter.  If he is unwilling to extend,  we HAVE to trade him.

 

Edit:  of course I'll still be a fan, just disappointed at the ineptitude.

Edited by joelala
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Frobby said:

Hmmm, I notice you've been pretty quiet on this subject lately after haranguing Manny for 3+ months.    

I've watched Orioles baseball for more than 50 years.    I will say unequivocally that Manny is one of the five best players who have ever played for this team.     Three are in the Hall of Fame, and the fourth guy (Mussina) should be.      

It'll be a crime if he leaves.

Wait a minute. Brooks Cal Eddie, and Frank, That's 4 plus Moose, So Manny makes 6? And what a bout Palmer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I would take Manny over both Eddie and Mussina. 

I'm not ready to say that after 5+ years in the majors.    Careers take funny turns sometimes.   But it won't surprise me if he does surpass a few of our other top 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, El Gordo said:

I won't because by the time he passes them he'll be aYankee/

So we are just counting Orioles stats? The claim was "five best players who have played for this team". By that standard I would take Manny over Eddie and Mussina right now because peak Manny is a more valuable player than peak Eddie or peak Mussina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

So we are just counting Orioles stats? The claim was "five best players who have played for this team". By that standard I would take Manny over Eddie and Mussina right now because peak Manny is a more valuable player than peak Eddie or peak Mussina.

You need to look at Eddie's numbers Manny so far: 

.281 .331 .480 .811 118

 Eddie though age 25 

.291 .354 .493 .847 136

Eddie won 3 GG had 3 straight years  of 156 OPS+ followed by a 157. He was ROY and a 7 time AL AS . Manny may get that good but he isn't that level now.

Edited by El Gordo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

So we are just counting Orioles stats? The claim was "five best players who have played for this team". By that standard I would take Manny over Eddie and Mussina right now because peak Manny is a more valuable player than peak Eddie or peak Mussina.

Anyone who played a substantial amount of time, say 5+ years.   No Reggie Jacksons or Roberto Alomars.    But otherwise their whole career counts.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, El Gordo said:

You need to look at Eddie's numbers Manny so far: 

.281 .331 .480 .811 118

 Eddie though age 25 

.291 .354 .493 .847 136

Eddie won 3 GG had 3 straight years  of 156 OPS+ followed by a 157. He was ROY and a 7 time AL AS . Manny may get that good but he isn't that level now.

Manny already has two GG (one platinum) playing a premium defensive position. Eddie could have been the best defensive 1B in history and he would not have half the defensive value of a player like Manny. Eddie's offensive numbers are compelling but Manny is a more complete baseball player. Manny already has 3 years of 6.5+ WAR. (Eddie had zero in his first 6 years). I would take Manny if the question is pure baseball talent. Obviously if the question is cumulative impact then you have to go with Eddie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Manny already has two GG (one platinum) playing a premium defensive position. Eddie could have been the best defensive 1B in history and he would not have half the defensive value of a player like Manny. Eddie's offensive numbers are compelling but Manny is a more complete baseball player. Manny already has 3 years of 6.5+ WAR. (Eddie had zero in his first 6 years). I would take Manny if the question is pure baseball talent. Obviously if the question is cumulative impact then you have to go with Eddie.

Well said.     Manny's probably never going to be quite the offensive force Eddie was, but when you add in the glove, he's probably the higher impact player.     But Eddie was elite for a decade, and then solidly above average for another decade.      Not everyone is able to maintain that, no matter how good they were in their early to mid 20's.

But while we're on the subject of comparing the two, I'm enjoying Manny's new-found, Eddie-like propensity for hitting grand slams.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think we're saying the same thing, or at least we rhyme. If they're going to include one league that has completely different quality of play, why not all leagues? Why stop at the Negro Leagues?
    • Baseball is different from most other team sports in a number of key aspects: The number of trials. 162 games is a lot of games to have random variation smooth out. If you pick random 16-game stretches you'll have NFL-like outliers, such as teams going 15-1 or 1-15. Nobody goes 150-12. Pitchers are very limited in how much they can pitch. A 200-inning starter can only have so much impact. Hitters cannot get more than ~1/8th of a team's PAs. This and the prior point means that there's no way around having your 3rd- and 5th and even 14th-best players getting almost as much playing time as #1. So you end up with the most dominant teams usually not even winning 2/3rds of their games, wherein other sports you can have teams win 80% or more. Which makes baseball look more random. Contributing to this is the expanded playoffs, where a .600 vs .575 matchup is more-or-less a coin flip. I doubt most other sports have a situation where the obviously best team in the league has a 25%-ish shot of the Championship (in other words, a 75% chance of going home disappointed) on day one of the playoffs. In most soccer leagues the regular season champ is The Champ, so there's a 0% chance of that. The best team always takes a big trophy home.
    • He got rewarded for swinging at a ball at his ankles.  He might also be able to hit a fastball up around his neck for a home run.  If he consistently swings at those types of pitches it will be to his detriment over the long run.  
    • People really underestimate luck and randomness. Drungo is right….baseball is no different than any other sport.
    • Yandy Diaz' BABIP for his career is .320. Last year it was .367. While batters exercise a larger degree of control over their BABIPs than pitchers, there is still a lot of noise (i.e. luck) in the data. This year his BABIP is down about 90 points compared to last. I would bet that's about equal parts not hitting the ball as well, and not having the balls he does hit fall in.
    • I think it can certainly be part of the recipe. 
    • Sure. But isn't that like saying a player pitched 85 innings of relief with a 3.00 ERA one year, then the next year he pitched 220 innings as a starter with a 3.00 ERA. I wouldn't say that was a consistent, expected performance.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...