-
Who's Online 50 Members, 0 Anonymous, 144 Guests (See full list)
- Spy Fox
- Frobby
- forphase1
- RZNJ
- DrinkinWithFermi
- 7Mo
- DoobyDoo
- clapdiddy
- mlrhode
- Bird Lady
- OsFanInOhio
- tom_o'malley
- wildcard
- rainchild908
- Pushmonkey
- Say O!
- pdiddy
- btownoriole
- MacAdoo
- 86this
- Philip
- Can_of_corn
- casadeozo
- murph
- OnlyOneOriole
- mall-O-cup
- OriolesUpAndDowns
- Roll Tide
- DirtyBird
- Don_Aase_Fan
- now
- Orioles Jim
- EddeeEddee
- waroriole
- Aglets
- Safelykept
- cravens86
- Cavspider
- Spakman
- dystopia
- 398 to Left
- Fiver6565
- jabba72
- Matt Bennett
- Chaka Garcia
- AirWaveGT
- nbets
- Sovaosfan
- Conway12
- Roy Firestone
-
Posts
-
Those are typically weights from when the player first signed. We have a guy named Estrada at Delmarva listed at 142. It’s comical sometimes. I think Armando Benitez for years was listed at 180. Ha! BRef still has Benitez listed at 6’4 180. -
By OsFanInOhio · Posted
You might have better luck looking at his ba/obp by month as well, not just his iso. I think you’d see a similar increase. He might have just had a slow start, or may have been adjusting to whatever the orioles asked him to change. Similar to horvath, and beavers previously. -
40% through this season Albert Suarez has shown he can compete with anyone. The O's are giving him better game planning, catchers, defense and coaching than he has ever had. He has shown he can make a lot of starts and pitch a lot of innings. He is the one to watch to step in for Bradish IMO. -
By OnlyOneOriole · Posted
You 100% have to trade for a pitcher. Not only to use for this year but you are going to need at least one for next year assuming he has TJ surgery. Sad news but I guess we can't be surprised. In fact I think I saw the pitch he hurt it on. It was I think in the 5th on a VERY HIGH FASTBALL. I said to my wife "that looks kind of like a pitch that Bautista hurt himself with last year. I hope he didn't just hurt himself." Sure enough.....he had. -
I'm sure that Elias has had a Plan WB... without Bradish...drawn up since the season began if not before. He isn't stupid, and knew this was a real possibility. I do not for see any desperate actions at all. -
By ChosenOne21 · Posted
This is obviously debatable, and it depends on what you mean by healthy. If 33% healthy means you're on the field 1/3 of the time, I'm not picking that player over A or C. If it means you have a 33% chance of avoiding the IL each year, I'd probably go with player B, though of course it depends what exactly the injury risk is. I have a slight preference for C over A, and B seems way too likely to get injured/spend too much time injured despite the higher upside. This is slightly confounded by the value difference between a 60 and a 50 being a lot more than between a 50 and a 40. Reasonable people can disagree on this though. -
I used his BBref data…mlb and fangraphs all have the same info
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.