Jump to content

The Time to Make a Decision on Chris Davis is Now


brianod

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 197
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Chris has averaged a home run every 15.18 times at bat during his career. How does that match up against some of the great home run hitters of all time? Mantle one in every 15.11, Williams one in every 14.79, Gehrig one in every 16.22, Mays one in every 16.48 and Aaron one in every 16.37.

Bonds and Ruth rank at the top at 12.92 and 11.76. This season, Chris has one home run every 12.19 times at bat!

For once, Angelos needs to put his money where his mouth is and sign Davis. Oriole fans deserve a competitive team for their continual support and I don't think this team can be competitive without Davis!

Dave Kingman averaged a homer every 15.11 PAs. Juan Gonzalez once every 15.05. Ryan Howard once every 15.05. Darryl Strawberry once every 16.1. Cecil Fielder once every 16.2. Richie Sexson once every 16.1. Hank Sauer once every 16.6. Rob Deer once every 16.9. How many of those guys wouldn't have been disasters with 5/125 or 7/175 contracts at 30?

Home runs are not the be all and end all. I'm real happy with Chris' season because, in addition to the homers, he's got a decent BA and a very good OBP this year. He's had a great year.

Also, he is a good defensive 1st baseman.

So he hits home runs, has a decent batting average, has a very good on-base percentage, and he's good on defense.

He also leads the team in walks (70) and taking called 3rd strikes (53), so he is clearly trying to get on base any way that he possibly can.

So he may not necessarily be irreplaceable, but in this particular season (2015), he does have a lot of upside going on for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, he is a good defensive 1st baseman.

So he hits home runs, has a decent batting average, has a very good on-base percentage, and he's good on defense.

He also leads the team in walks (70) and taking called 3rd strikes (53), so he is clearly trying to get on base any way that he possibly can.

So he may not necessarily be irreplaceable, but in this particular season (2015), he does have a lot of upside going on for him.

He is certainly having a very fine season. Unfortunately, he's only had two non-consecutive seasons that count as unqualified successes and he's going to be 30 next year. I would love to have 2015 Chris Davis for the next 7 years at $20M a pop. I'd like it a bit less if the Orioles were paying $20M a year for his 2014 season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is certainly having a very fine season. Unfortunately, he's only had two non-consecutive seasons that count as unqualified successes and he's going to be 30 next year. I would love to have 2015 Chris Davis for the next 7 years at $20M a pop. I'd like it a bit less if the Orioles were paying $20M a year for his 2014 season.

Very good point(s), I agree completely.

Right this minute, Davis is looking about as irreplaceable as one can look.

But if you step back and look at it more objectively, Davis' 2014 season that was sandwiched in between his 2013 and 2015 seasons can be very alarming.

And there are a few wise posters (such as yourself) that have been able to point that out. :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Davis is hitting 263, 337, 513 with 5 hrs and 17 rbis. This in an ops of .849 and he projects out to hit 35 home runs and 120 rbis.

If the Orioles want to resign him, now is the time to do it. If he meets these projections, I don't think we'll be able to afford him. For all I know, the decision has been made and that decision is to let him go. But, if not, I don't think the Orioles have the luxury of waiting until the end of the season because I do expect him to do this for an entire season.

Ok. I heard the Orioles decided when you asked for them to to. Problem is, his agent wants to see what others have to say about things? You ok with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was responding to someone else who seemed to gloss over the loss of Davis by their commenting something to the effect of "at least we will get a draft pick."

I am glad you and I both value draft picks as the only way to possibly strengthen our mediocre farm system so that the teams we watch over the next 15 season will be good too. Just like the teams we have watched since April of 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Markakis and Cruz should not be lumped together. Most people here were right on both - that we should have kept Cruz and should not have kept Markakis. Cruz was a great talent who was healthy. Markakis was a good talent who was clearly declining at least defensively and scheduled for a neck operation.

With Davis, you can't just say no without giving an alternative. If we had kept Cruz - which most people here were right on, it would be much easier to say no to Davis. Without him, Jones is the only legit middle of the lineup hitter we'd have - and Jones is not a great hitter. I'm not saying we have to keep Davis - as I think he'll be much more expensive than Cruz was - but we need an alternative if we let him get away. We can't just say no, and leave it at that.

You are wrong that "most people here" wanted to keep Cruz. Only 24% thought we should have matched the Mariners' offer. http://forum.orioleshangout.com/forums/showthread.php/145416-Would-you-have-matched-SEA-offer-to-keep-Cruz-an-Oriole?highlight=cruz

As to Davis, it all depends on what you have to pay him. Of course we'd like him back at some price. But what price? At 6/$100 mm, I'd probably be in. At 7/$175 mm, I'd certainly be out. Somewhere in between is my stopping point, but I haven't sharpened my pencil yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are wrong that "most people here" wanted to keep Cruz. Only 24% thought we should have matched the Mariners' offer. http://forum.orioleshangout.com/forums/showthread.php/145416-Would-you-have-matched-SEA-offer-to-keep-Cruz-an-Oriole?highlight=cruz

As to Davis, it all depends on what you have to pay him. Of course we'd like him back at some price. But what price? At 6/$100 mm, I'd probably be in. At 7/$175 mm, I'd certainly be out. Somewhere in between is my stopping point, but I haven't sharpened my pencil yet.

Wasn't there a 2nd, more recent poll about retaining Cruz? As I recall, in that poll, most people thought that they should have kept him.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't there a 2nd, more recent poll about retaining Cruz? As I recall, in that poll, most people thought that they should have kept him.

I wish we never traded Davey Johnson. I never wanted to. I wish we had kept Steve Finley and Curt Schilling. I wish we had traded Matt Riley. And Adam Loewen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Couple of things about what Mike said: 1).   Grayson will not start during the regular season.    Time has run out to build him up.   That means Burnes, Eflin. Suarez, Kremer and Povich the rest of the way if they can stay healthy.   Maybe Grayson as an opener or a reliever in the playoffs. Coulombe  as early as Friday.  I am guess either Smith or Kimbrel go. Westy and  Urias  on rehab  in the next few days.   Getting these guys back could be a  big mental boost for the team.  What level of performance they will be able to produce coming off a layoff is another things.      I would think Mayo and Holliday are optioned. Mountcastle is swinging but his wrist is still sore.   Where that goes in anyones guess.   If he comes back Jimenez will not be needed. 2).  When Mike says this has been a winning team for that last two years and he believes they can get back to that,  to me he is not just talking about the team.     He is talking about himself.    This is the first time Mike has experienced things not going the way he planned to this degree.    Quite frankly his looks a little shell shocked.    The pitching having troubles with injuries is reality to him.  Pitchers get hurt.    But his offense going from 5 runs per game in the first half  to almost zero is shocking to him.   He did not see that coming.  Adley, and O'Hearn were supposed to step up when needed.   Instead they took a step back.  None of Holliday, Mayo, or Kjerstad being able to help in the 2nd half was not the way this was planned.    Here is hoping the Westy, Urias and Kjerstad can help real soon.  
    • This board is smart enough to realize that the grass isn't always greener. The only way I see Hyde on the hot seat is if we miss the playoffs completely, which still feels very unlikely. Even then, I doubt he'd be fired during the offseason, but maybe. But then what? I don't think you give Buck Britton a shot at this roster. He's doing his thing and doing it well at AAA helping to develop guys. Could bring back Buck Showalter or Joe Girrardi, those sound like fun names. Or better yet, I bet everyone here with a torch and a pitchfork has their own little crystal ball with a short list of candidates ready to catch lightning in a bottle. 
    • The 4-run deficit was surmountable if we had more than one player who can hit the damn ball.   Kimbrel giving up six runs in the 9th may turn out to be a blessing.    
    • I wonder if last night was kind of a face saving tipping point though. Kimbrel and/or Eloy are easy famous names if Elias wants to "get serious" about optics. Not anything involving any of the long term chosen ones obviously.  
    • Really hoping the Minnesota series means nothing. I don’t care what seed they get right now..just get in. They aren’t any better at home than they are away. If you can have your spot clinched by Minnesota, I want to see them rest as many guys as possible for those games.
    • Parsing words I think "the testing of our depth" part is as close as Elias will come to critiquing Holliday and Mayo. I believe the club prides itself on its ability to prepare Bats to be ready to stay up, etc., but I do wonder if Sig Mejdal's "leading, bleeding edge" has made substitutes for actual MLB competition less effective than they have been in recent years. As awful as this run is, I've seen some comments a big off-season is ahead, but I'm not sure I agree.     There's nothing to do next April but play the guys you've planted your flag on.      Adley, Ryan, Holliday, Gunnar, Westburg, Cowser, Mullins, Kjerstad and Mayo is I think about as set an Opening Day lineup as you can find inching towards the winter.    Tommy Pham will be available for free next summer if somebody can't play. Certainly some interesting day to day calls for however long this year's ride the club can hold on for.    Prospect growth is not linear, and it still isn't impossible Holliday or Mayo will display some in the next 2 weeks.     Mayo can take dozens of at bats a day against Hurter with easy access to the Trajekt machine at home.
    • Mullins swing in a 3-2 count at a pitch that started at his shins and just was never a strike was telling. They are pressing beyond pressing, obviously. I'm just not seeing any spark from anywhere. They look tired.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...