Jump to content

Coco Crisp to Mets?


blueberryale77

Recommended Posts

WFAN is reporting that the Mets are close to acquiring Coco Crisp from the Red Sox for Angel Pagan. This sounds to me like not enough value for Crisp, but more realistic than the Boston sources that were earlier claiming they were going to get Rich Hill for Crisp and a prospect. The Mets could use RH outfield help, but Crisp isn't exactly a perfect fit. They need more of a corner OF/1B type who can spell Delgado. I also wonder how badly the Cubs wanted him and if they offered more than Angel Pagan (who they recently sold back to the Mets for cash considerations).

As for links, the only place it's in print is blogs and mlbtraderumors, and they just site the WFAN report.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the case here is that the Red Sox dont want Crisp complaining about being a 4th OF. Ellisbury has earned the CF spot, he shouldnt have to go back to AAA. The Sox are basically giving Crisp away, but in Pagan get a player they know will be content in the back-up OF spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the case here is that the Red Sox dont want Crisp complaining about being a 4th OF. Ellisbury has earned the CF spot, he shouldnt have to go back to AAA. The Sox are basically giving Crisp away, but in Pagan get a player they know will be content in the back-up OF spot.

Absolutely it's a matter of them just getting rid of him to get rid of him. Pagan is tearing it up this spring and all, but it still seems like the Sox could get a little more (not that I want them to), even if they are desperate to dump him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Covelli Crisp of

3 years/$15.5M (2007-09), plus $8M 2010 club option

* signed extension 4/06

* $1M signing bonus

* 07:$3.5M, 08:$4.75M, 09:$5.75M, 10:$8M club option ($0.5M buyout)

* 1 year/$2.75M (2006)

o re-signed 2/06, avoided arbitration ($3.05M-$2.35M)

* 1 year/$0.3649M (2005), re-signed 3/05

* 1 year/$0.3194M (2004), re-signed 3/04

* agent: Steve Comte

* ML service: 4.158

I didnt realize he signed such a big deal. But I wonder where he will play when/if Alou/Beltran/Church are all healthy at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely it's a matter of them just getting rid of him to get rid of him. Pagan is tearing it up this spring and all, but it still seems like the Sox could get a little more (not that I want them to), even if they are desperate to dump him.

I think that is harder done than said. Corey Patterson had to sign a minor league deal and Kenny Lofton is still a free agent. Apparently teams just arent in the market for OFers right now. Most people thought the Mets were going to waive Pagan anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didnt realize he signed such a big deal. But I wonder where he will play when/if Alou/Beltran/Church are all healthy at the same time.

Alou will miss his share of time due to age and Church could stand to sit against most lefties. They'll find room. Beltran always has his share of injuries too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alou will miss his share of time due to age and Church could stand to sit against most lefties. They'll find room. Beltran always has his share of injuries too.

Heck, Beltran is coming back from an injury just now. He has been DHing because of a sore knee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I think a more relaxed Norby tags one of those Gausman meatballs for at least a base hit. He fouled some off, and chased some out of the zone. Looking forward to seeing more of him. 
    • Frobby I won’t say that’s a strawman, but that is a blatantly incorrect interpretation of what I have said. I have repeatedly said that sometimes you do the right thing and lose anyway, and vice versa. I have also said that there’s nothing wrong with being wrong.  But you’ve watched the games too, you know there have been games that were lost because of objectively bad decisions. I don’t care about Gunnar throwing away that ball in the Pittsburgh series, I don’t care about holiday making a mistake. Things happen. I care about Hyde Making obvious mistakes.  Are you saying that not one single game has been lost because of such? I don’t lose any sleep over it, a game finished is a game past. But I want to win the Division. Last year, we won the division, then lost the division series. I would much rather have had that scenario than to have made the playoffs as a wildcard team, won a wildcard series and then lost in the division series. No, I’m not kicking the cat about it, and I’m not Firestoning about it either, but I’m not being unreasonable.
    • On one hand I want to say he just doesn’t have anywhere to play, on the other hand…he’s playing because of injuries/ineffectiveness of other players so while he seems buried in the depth chart and we’re barely in June and that depth is being utilized.    I’ve been writing him off as a sure thing to be traded and never putting on an Orioles uniform. I’m reassessing that a little considering he hits right handed and I’m happy that Holliday wasn’t called back up for reasons of positional need rather than he’s actually ready. 
    • If Burnes, GRod, and Bradish stay healthy, we are as set as we can be regardless of division winner or wild card. Will more than likely have to go through the Yankees either way. Just keep winning series and play best ball in October. That's what I wish for. Winning division then one and out means very little except a flag to fly. So to answer OP question - zippo.
    • Skubal has never pitched more than 150 innings and he'll be 28 next year. I dunno man. The results are legit for sure, but not sure he's worth Holliday. 
    • Also, I think for most of us traditional/longtime baseball fans, it is still in grained into our psychology (to some degree) that winning the division matters. Because for years (most of the history of the game) that is the only way that you could qualify for the postseason. However, when you look at teams who do well in the postseason (like last year's 2 WS teams), they weren't division winners. They just got hot at the right time. And truly that's all it takes in a short series format where things like depth are not nearly as important as it is most about top end talent and being able to perform against the other teams best (starters, relievers, batters). In other sports like hockey and basketball being a division winner is larger irrelevant because of the postseason format. Baseball with the additional Wild Cards has become the same way IMO.
    • IMO it really doesn't matter much. We are almost assuredly going to be in the playoffs. What matters most is how we are playing at the close of the season (going into the playoffs). We won the division and won 101 games last season as we outpaced TB. And in October (neither teams' great regular seasons matter). And teams like HOU and TEX were playing in the ALCS who weren't nearly as good all year.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...