Jump to content

Best AL Record Since Dan Duquette Arrived.


weams

Recommended Posts

When 1 game out, I dont think you let "strength of schedule" decided is you are going to continue to compete. This team had the talent to win 10 more games than it did....they just didnt play to the talent level. In Fact, one 10 game stretch (1-9) did us in....win 5 of those games and the season looks much different.

The reason we were one game out was because our schedule to that point was fairly weak. The reason we fell off the pace is because our schedule became tougher. It's pretty simple. If you don't think SoS is a critical factor, IMO the most important factor, then we will have to agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The reason we were one game out was because our schedule to that point was fairly weak. The reason we fell off the pace is because our schedule became tougher. It's pretty simple. If you don't think SoS is a critical factor, IMO the most important factor, then we will have to agree to disagree.

For me the wheels came off, that series against the Twins at Home in Mid to Late August. They were 4 games above 500 and dropped 4 in a row and at least 2 of those games, they were winning late in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You cant give up on the season when you are 1 game out of a playoff spot at the deadline. The goal EVERY year is the make the playoffs...if you are in striking distance in July/Aug you owe it to your fans to not "give up" on the year.

I agree, but accessing your weaknesses at the trade deadline and acquiring Parra as your only addition, might as well be throwing in the towel. Did anyone honestly think that acquiring Parra at the deadline = printing playoff tickets?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, but accessing your weaknesses at the trade deadline and acquiring Parra as your only addition, might as well be throwing in the towel. Did anyone honestly think that acquiring Parra at the deadline = printing playoff tickets?

At the time, it look like it might be some help, he had a good first half, and like AJ said, the guy is a player and knows how to play the game.

The CoF up to that point, had not done much and yet the team was still in contention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, the wheels came off, that series against the Twins at Home in mid-to-late August. They were 4 games above .500 and dropped 4 in a row, and in at least 2 of those games, they were winning late in the game.

I think that the proverbial wheels may have fallen off before that.

The pinnacle of the season was when the Orioles swept the Indians in late June, and had surged into 1st place.

At that point (June 28th), the Orioles had gone on an 18-5 tear, improving their overall record from 23-29 to 41-34.

Then they went on a massive slide, going 5-15 over their next 20 games to fall to 46-49, 7 full games behind the first-place Yankees.

After that, they had a few modest winning spurts in which they were able to flirt with contention for a wildcard spot ...... but I believe (in hindsight) that that 5-15 run really exposed the 2015 Orioles as the mediocre team that they were, and not the solid 88-or-more-win team that we were hoping that they would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the proverbial wheels may have fallen off before that.

The pinnacle of the season was when the Orioles swept the Indians in late June, and had surged into 1st place.

At that point (June 28th), the Orioles had gone on an 18-5 tear, improving their overall record from 23-29 to 41-34.

Then they went on a massive slide, going 5-15 over their next 20 games to fall to 46-49, 7 full games behind the first-place Yankees.

After that, they had a few modest winning spurts in which they were able to flirt with contention for a wildcard spot ...... but I believe (in hindsight) that that 5-15 run really exposed the 2015 Orioles as the mediocre team that they were, and not the solid 88-or-more-win team that we were hoping that they would be.

You could very well to be right, and you make good arguments to your opinion, especially the part about being in first place.

I was speaking for my own hope for the season, to me, it was still reachable until that really bad stretch of winnable games and then the fat lady was singing her song.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me the wheels came off, that series against the Twins at Home in Mid to Late August. They were 4 games above 500 and dropped 4 in a row and at least 2 of those games, they were winning late in the game.

I think that the proverbial wheels may have fallen off before that.

The pinnacle of the season was when the Orioles swept the Indians in late June, and had surged into 1st place.

At that point (June 28th), the Orioles had gone on an 18-5 tear, improving their overall record from 23-29 to 41-34.

Then they went on a massive slide, going 5-15 over their next 20 games to fall to 46-49, 7 full games behind the first-place Yankees.

After that, they had a few modest winning spurts in which they were able to flirt with contention for a wildcard spot ...... but I believe (in hindsight) that that 5-15 run really exposed the 2015 Orioles as the mediocre team that they were, and not the solid 88-or-more-win team that we were hoping that they would be.

You could very well to be right, and you make good arguments to your opinion, especially the part about being in first place.

I was speaking for my own hope for the season, to me, it was still reachable until that really bad stretch of winnable games and then the fat lady was singing her song.

Oh, OK.

For me the final nail in the coffin was the sweep at the hands of the Red Sox.

The Orioles had just swept the Nationals, had managed to get to .500 (76-76), and were 3 and-a-half games behind the Astros for the final wildcard spot.

It was still a long-shot at that point, but if they had swept the Red Sox and not the other way around, they would have been 79-76 instead of 76-79, and Birdland would have been going berserk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vince Lombardi probably never managed a team to a championship that had 73 losses in one year. If you run a baseball team thinking that every loss is the tragic result of employing a bunch of losers you'll run your car into a bridge abutment at 125 mph somewhere around May 13th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vince Lombardi probably never managed a team to a championship that had 73 losses in one year. If you run a baseball team thinking that every loss is the tragic result of employing a bunch of losers you'll run your car into a bridge abutment at 125 mph somewhere around May 13th.

Only playing 14 games, would give more significance to a single loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vince Lombardi probably never managed a team to a championship that had 73 losses in one year. If you run a baseball team thinking that every loss is the tragic result of employing a bunch of losers you'll run your car into a bridge abutment at 125 mph somewhere around May 13th.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8WF_UqHQpx0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Had to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This made me think of 1996. And I became curious where we stood on 7/31/96. I looked it up - turns out we had the 7th-place winning percentage in the AL and were 10 games back for the division.

Much different than 1 game out of a playoff spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason we were one game out was because our schedule to that point was fairly weak. The reason we fell off the pace is because our schedule became tougher. It's pretty simple. If you don't think SoS is a critical factor, IMO the most important factor, then we will have to agree to disagree.

How can your schedule be "fairly weak" through 100 games? By that time you have pretty much played everyone you are going to play in the last 62.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, but accessing your weaknesses at the trade deadline and acquiring Parra as your only addition, might as well be throwing in the towel. Did anyone honestly think that acquiring Parra at the deadline = printing playoff tickets?

It took a team that was 1 game out, and improved a weak position...so yes it was reasonable to believe the team that was only 1 game out of a spot, would play better the last two months of the season with a better corner outfielder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I don’t think it was weird at all.  EDC said it but I thought it unfolded as expected.  You knew the QBs would go. You knew tons of OT and WR would go.   This was always going to be an offense dominated first round. The Oline and WR depth is in every round. I suspect that they go Oline twice or Oline/WR tonight.  Obviously you never know how the board falls but I think that’s what is likely.   This is mainly going to be an offense draft. EDC said a few weeks ago that they will draft a RB.  My guess is that the RB goes sometime in day 3. They will come out of this draft with at least 2 more Olineman, one WR and one RB.  I suspect they take a safety at some point as well. The question will be do they take 9 players.  The Ravens didn’t feel this was a draft with as many draftable players as years past, so I wouldn’t be surprised if they make some kind of a trade. 
    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...