Jump to content

Trumbo an Oriole (For Clevenger Done Deal)


MASNPalmer

Recommended Posts

If it was the Orioles trading for Clevenger, what would you expect the Orioles to pay?

I would probably expect to pay some other pre-arb guy that is out of options. I might be overvaluing Clevenger or I am just really not a fan of Trumbo at $9M, especially if they plan to put him in the field.

At that price, they have reportedly spent $25M of a $40M approx budget and still arent better then what they had last year.

Sent from my LG-D850 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 663
  • Created
  • Last Reply

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">For fans who keep asking, acquiring Trumbo doesn't close door on <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/orioles?src=hash">#orioles</a> re-signing Davis. Can serve in DH role. Provides insurance at 1B</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">December 2, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Hearing reports that deal is done with Orioles for Trumbo, but nothing official yet. There's a second player going to Baltimore, I'm told.</p>— Greg Johns (@GregJohnsMLB) <a href="

">December 2, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">For fans who keep asking, acquiring Trumbo doesn't close door on <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/orioles?src=hash">#orioles</a> re-signing Davis. Can serve in DH role. Provides insurance at 1B</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="
">December 2, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The only thing I don't like is that he is right handed. His splits against right handed pitching are not good. His price is steep for a platoon player too. But hey, he can help beat up on David Price with the rest of the team. :)

Look, Clevenger has a career 66 OPS+ at the majors. Those who worry about losing him are overvaluing him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it hard to believe the Orioles would take on Trumbo'd contract at the expense of helping the team in other areas of need. Payroll has to be going up.

I like the move if he is used mainly as a DH.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Orioles did like Danny Hultzen, but that would be a throw in at this point.</p>— Camden Depot (@CamdenDepot) <a href="

">December 2, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in favor of the trade. Clevenger is a 30-year old spare part. I liked the guy, but he'd have a marginal impact. I'm not the biggest Trumbo fan but he's got a decent chance to hit 30 bombs playing at OPACY. Could be a 2-3 win player if things break right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">For fans who keep asking, acquiring Trumbo doesn't close door on <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/orioles?src=hash">#orioles</a> re-signing Davis. Can serve in DH role. Provides insurance at 1B</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="
">December 2, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Paredes at DH as a lefty

Trumbo at DH/1B as a righty

Davis at 1B/RF as a lefty

I can see that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Orioles did like Danny Hultzen, but that would be a throw in at this point.</p>? Camden Depot (@CamdenDepot) <a href="
">December 2, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I wouldnt be against him as a throw-in. He is off the 40 man and the Os could use the lottery ticket.

Sent from my LG-D850 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Orioles did like Danny Hultzen, but that would be a throw in at this point.</p>— Camden Depot (@CamdenDepot) <a href="
">December 2, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

That would fit Dan's MO. He does seem to like on highly touted guys who have lost some of their luster. I like the trade honestly. Not like Steve is exactly young and I think Trumbo will be a good fit for our park and didivision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • From here https://www.mlb.com/orioles/stats/ops/regular-season
    • Where are you getting your stats from that's not correct looking at OPS.
    • On the O's this year, Martinez would have been: 5th in OPS 5th in AVG 6th in HRs in 120 games
    • I think PFF is grading Roquan badly because the safeties behind him are playing like ass and it's making him look bad.  If teams are going to attack him over the middle on crossing routes with WRs (like KC did with Rice) he doesn't really stand much of a chance if the safeties behind him don't throw him a bone.  He's still a huge help in the run game.   In general I think PFF assigns a little too much blame to linebackers on passes over the middle, so unless you're an elite coverage guy at LB it's really hard to grade well.  The flip side to this is that teams probably need to adjust their coverage areas to account for the fact that LBs aren't going to be able to hold down WRs for long.  
    • Thanks. This tells me what my eyes have seen with Roquan. He's been a liability in coverage and the fact that Simpson is ahead of him is not good for our defensive leader. Do you have the PFF grades for offense too?
    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...