Jump to content

Is the D-Rays line up better


baltimorebirds

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't trade Ramon right now unless you are getting a good young catcher in a deal.

Salty seems to be available from the Braves. If you could get him in a deal, that would be enough for me to say trade Ramon.

I would be locking up Bedard, DCab and Markakis into arb-friendly deals.

If you can't lock up bedard, he should be shopped at the deadline and you will get back a very good package.

Tejada and Ray almost have to go IMO.

BRob should be shopped as well. I don't feel a need to trade him but he is signed cheap enough and is still good enough that you could get alot for him now IMO.....Call the Mets.

I think they might move Salty, but they don't want Ramon. They have a batter catcher who's a lot younger.

Bedard, Tejada, and Ray would probably bring a huge return (especially Bedard). How many top of the rotation LHPs are usually available?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 141
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I still think we are pretty far away from considering trading Bedard. You have to have a core identity somewhere, and starting pitching is a good place to start. I have never been a "Bedard is untouchable" guy, but you'd need an awful lot for him.

He's probably not at the point now but if he finishes strong this year he has a ton of value. I think with anyone on the roster you have to at least put guys out there and see what the return might be. As usual I think the A's are a good example... If Bedard continues to improve and you can get a package similar to what they got for a Mulder how can you not pull the trigger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point is, not long ago, the notion of trading Bedard was almost universally considered rediculous and laughable around here. I see that changing real fast (and based on some responses in this thread, maybe even faster than I imagined).
I admit, before the season, I was in that camp, too. I looked at Bedard in the same way as Markakis - young, cheap, good...why would you trade someone like that?

But the team's current performance (injuries, bad luck, utter stupidity in almost every regard, bad news on the farm, etc.) has me thinking that this team, currently constituted, is never going to win anything. Ever.

Let's face it, for the O's to contend in the next two years, a lot has to go right. And so far, almost everything has gone wrong. Even Golden Boy Markakis has stunk. Penn has been hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they might move Salty, but they don't want Ramon. They have a batter catcher who's a lot younger.

Bedard, Tejada, and Ray would probably bring a huge return (especially Bedard). How many top of the rotation LHPs are usually available?

He's saying that if you can get Salty, you trade Ramon elsewhere. Of course the Braves don't want Ramon, but someone will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they might move Salty, but they don't want Ramon. They have a batter catcher who's a lot younger.

Bedard, Tejada, and Ray would probably bring a huge return (especially Bedard). How many top of the rotation LHPs are usually available?

I am not saying to trade Ramon for Salty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No on the decline question.

I see him becoming worth more to the Orioles for the young talent he could be traded for, than for the production he will give them on the field. Just like is the case with Tejada now.

So I envision that the same arguments being made now for trading Tejada will come to be applied to Bedard in the not-too-distant future.

The point is, not long ago, the notion of trading Bedard was almost universally considered rediculous and laughable around here. I see that changing real fast (and based on some responses in this thread, maybe even faster than I imagined).

If we can get Bedard signed to a 4 year deal at 10 million a year or less, i don't want him dealt. (btw, we can get that deal done).

The problem is, we are dealing with the Orioles here and have to rely on them being smart. So, that is why it is tough to just dismiss trading Bedard for me because i am not sure we get him extended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can get Bedard signed to a 4 year deal at 10 million a year or less, i don't want him dealt. (btw, we can get that deal done).

The problem is, we are dealing with the Orioles here and have to rely on them being smart. So, that is why it is tough to just dismiss trading Bedard for me because i am not sure we get him extended.

If history repeats itself (Mussina, Ryan), you can bet on them screwing around with this until his last year before FA, when he will refuse to sign an extension after the season begins, then we will fail to trade him, because "we're not giving up on this season! Not for THESE great fans!" and then we will lose him for draft picks. Which is OK, but nothing like what we could get for him if we made a decision now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I doubt Ortiz will have an 800+ OPS all year but I guess its possible. Right now the trade looks like a win for both teams. Milwaukee of course gets 5 more years after this to fully reap the benefits. 
    • Probably because of pitch count. Doesn’t change my point. 
    • Robert would be a significant upgrade over Mullins (offensively). Not sure how much of a difference the two have defensively. But as much as I like Mullins, he has been really bad with the bat in his hand for about a season now. Second half of last season and most of the first half of this season. Obviously the issue with Robert is his health/availability, so there would be risk there. But I wouldn't mind if Elias took a swing there, as long as this wouldn't be his only move. I would like to see Elias act bold and decisively this go round (at the deadline). I heard that the CHI SOX wanted a "Soto like" package (that the Nats got for trading him to the Pads) back for Robert. We know that they have a recent history of over asking on players they are in theory willing to trade. Anybody have a guess on what the realistic costs for Robert would be?
    • This is all correct. And to add to it, If Gunnar only continues being this version of Gunnar, he is out-valued only by the sole two-way player in baseball (Ohtani). So, comparing Soto to Gunnar in a vacuum might make some sense, their situations are vastly different. The closeness of the young guys has been well documented and we know that the group of Adley, Gunnar, Mountcastle, Stowers, Westy and Cowser are all strong in their faith. I do believe that will play some part in the contract finagling. I do not know any of them personally and with the union, the pressure of the sport, endorsements, etc. etc. ... I realize that at the end of the day guys are going to want what they are worth but I have long thought two things about this crop of players: they are incredibly consistent but they also seem to be genuinely good kids who want to win and put the team first. We don't know yet what will happen over the next few years with these players but I wouldn't be surprised to see a version of what the cast of Friends did early in the show's run, where they essentially formed their own union of sorts and structured their compensation so that none of them would become bigger than the sum of their parts. Again, I don't know them personally and I am fully in-tune with the idea that they all want to be paid but I think that their closeness means more to them than Soto's relationship with his teammates in Washington, and I think that holds true with respect to almost literally any other free agent in the history of the game. They are very unique in that they have this young group who are all 23 - 27 right now who are very tight. I happen to think that the stars of this team will be more inclined to consider more team-friendly deals if it means that their posse can stay in-tact for a longer duration of time. Call me naïve but that's how I see it. I've been intimately involved in the game at various levels myself and I can honestly say that I can't remember a group of young players who demonstrated a caring for each other to the same level of these kids. It could mean nothing when Gunnar is being thrown half a billion dollars or when Adley is offered the moon but I just don't see these players being as motivated by money as other (especially recent) stars.  I agree 100% that Gunnar would jump all over that Witt Jr. deal. I think he is smart enough to know that anything could happen over the next five years. Plus $288 million is a shitload of money. I don't know how  many generations of wealth that is but damn that's a lot of money for a soon to be 23 year old kid.   
    • There is a lot to like and I can't see why nobody would want him but for the possibility that he won't help the team much in October 2024, the cost would probably be an absurd ask.
    • I think the focus is going to be on relief pitching.   I don't think any of the guys SG listed would be needed for the types of relievers the O's will be going after.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...