Jump to content

For crying out loud, can MLB please implement an electronic strike zone already?


weams

Recommended Posts

On 8/6/2020 at 11:07 AM, DrungoHazewood said:

Homers are down from 1.39 to 1.19 per game (still super high, third highest ever).  It would be a bit of work to separate out the short games on game time, but the overall average is only three minutes off last year.

So a couple weeks later batting average has crept up to .240, which would be just the 4th-lowest of all time.  But homers now stand at 1.31 team/game, which is 2nd-highest of all time behind only last season.  Any thought that they unjuiced the ball seems unfounded. 

SSS, but singles, doubles, and triples are all down a little.  K's just barely off last year's record pace, and walks a up a bit.  So, if anything, we're continuing on the trend of three true outcomes baseball. 

I watched QuickPitch yesterday and probably 60% of the highlights were a big uppercut swing followed by everyone watching a homer land 19 empty rows up in the stands.  And that number includes them showing the random last out of every game, which was a strikeout more than 1/3 of the time.

Game times sitting on 3:08, 2nd-longest of all time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do these 2-dimensional renderings work?  The strike zone, of course, is 3-dimentional.  Think cube, rather than square.  Pitch 6 in the rendering Corn provided appears to be an atrocious call (as CarrRun49 said above it may have been a FU to the Nats), and pitch 3 looks like a clear miss.  Pitch 5, however is either a strike, or, if not, is as close as a pitch can possibly come without hitting the zone.  Remember, if any part of the ball touches any part of the zone, it is a strike.  I wonder at what point the slice of the zone that is shown takes place.  If it is anywhere except the very front of the plate, pitch 5 would almost surely be a strike, it seems to me, as the ball gets lower as it passes through the zone.  Poor umpiring for sure, as to call pitch 3 a ball and pitch 5 a strike is without question inconsistent.  Though pitch 5 does look to me like it may well have been a strike, I get the Nationals being upset by that strike call after seeing the poor ball call on pitch 3.  Players try to adapt during the game to the umpire's zone, and when the guy has no clear zone, it can get ridiculous for both teams.  I will say that, IMO, between those 2 pitches, pitch 3 is clearly the worse call.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I was lqtm-ing earlier this evening ("laughing quietly to myself") when I was thinking about your role as a moderator on OH, Weams, and the responsibilities you undertake while reading a now-locked thread. I think you do a fine job. In theme with this thread you started, maybe the Hangout needs an "electronic moderator," like MLB needs an electronic strike zone. Then when posters get jacked up about a post and their appeals come in, Michael, you could be like the Booth in New York and wield your determination. You couldn't do worse than the MLB umpire appeals crew does percentage wise. And I like to imagine you swinging a gavel -- that could be your next avatar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may rank as one of the worst home plate umpired series of all time with consistently missed strike calls that appeared on the line of the electronic zone. It became laughable after the second game. Even Bordick could not make excuses for the umps. As I told a friend the Jays must have given the umps free dinner night at the best restaurant in Buffalo for all of the two strike at bats that became ball fours instead of strike threes and ended up hurting the Orioles. If the head of the umpires reviewed each game in this series they would understand the need for an electronic zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

The Giants need to win to make the playoffs.  They trailed by a run in the bottom of the 9th with two outs and no one on.

A guy named Slater with a .418 OBP was up.   The Giants' best hitter, Mike Yastrzemski, was on deck.   Slater was called out on strikes on a ball that was clearly not a strike.   It ended the game, and the Giants' season, and sent the Brewers to the playoffs.

 

The White Sox trailed 10-8 with 2 outs in the bottom of the 9th.   If they lost the game they would fall to the 7 seed.   If they won the game, and the Twins lost, they would win the division and be the #3 seed.   At the time, Cincinnati had scored 3 in the top of the 10th at Minnesota so a Twin loss was likely.

White Sox got a man on so the tie run was at the plate.   Nomar Mazara.   He was called out on a ball that was probably not a strike, to end the game.   To give the Twins the division title and knock Chicago from possibly being a 3 seed to being the 7 seed.

 

Critical, questionable ball strike calls on the last pitch of the last game for two different teams made a huge difference in who gets in the postseason and who gets what seed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Oriole1940 said:

I learned when playing college ball that if the time of day is late, a rainshower is coming up, or any other happening causes the game to last longer than the umps think it should,  that they call it a strike,  if the catcher caught the ball.   Just a word to the wise.

Right, but one would hope that professionals at the highest level would be above that sort of behavior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As MLB was bouncing around, one of the Giants other final six outs was a punch out of Longoria in the 8th that also looked like a pretty bad call, on another low pitch.  

Had a chuckle at how SF released Samardzija too to give themselves an extra roster spot for the final two days ala Buck demoting guys before the ASB.   Cobb can't possibly make it that far next year, can he?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I've been thinking about #2 a lot and wondering why this didn't come up at Elias' press conference.  I think the answer if you have to target a RH bat who isn't solely power-focused or chasing HR numbers, but who is otherwise a caliber of lefty-masher better than Mounty. Or, you force that hitter here via trade.
    • Last offseason with John (I am so poor) Angelos still in charge, along with the depth in the upper minor leagues it made sense to make a trade for someone like Burnes.  I don't think Elias should be looking at making a trade this offseason using any of our young talent.  It is time for Rubenstein to open the checkbook and land us a TOR starter and a big bat.  The days of having too many prospects is over, I want to see us have some solid depth options in AAA if we need it.
    • On #1: the question is whether all of Mayo, Kjerstad, Cowser, and Holliday have everyday roles or if are some platooned or held back in Norfolk or traded? If they all play everyday, there’s not really a meaty role to offer to a new bat. In the various post-mortems, this seems to be one of the biggest points of differences among posters.  Some want no logjams while others want one or more proven MOO professional hitters and don’t want to rely on Holliday or Mayo. My view is in the middle of the spectrum. I think at least one of Cowser or Mullins needs to sit vs. LHP, so we need a lefty masher capable of playing left field at Camden.  I think we may consider trading Mounty to make room for Mayo.
    • I find #8 to be an interesting one. On the one hand, McCann seems well-liked, he brings some toughness and veteran presence, and he actually had his best offensive season since 2020. At 35, you can probably have him for a 1 year deal if you want. And Basallo isn't really that close to coming up and catching just yet. He's a deep 2nd half kind of callup if you need him. And it's not like the free agent backup catcher market is much better than McCann. On the other hand, I have a sour taste in my mouth from game 1 where he couldn't make contact with men on base. Adley certainly didn't get any better under his wise tutelage. And maybe there are guys out there who surpass McCann defensively and bring a different wrinkle to the clubhouse. So I wouldn't be mad about a change. 
    • Actually 10 - I fat fingered the post button before I was ready.
    • This is my thought process regarding the pitching staff next season, ideally we resign Burnes but if not another TOR like Snell or Fried need to be signed this offseason.  Eflin GRod and Kremer are a really solid 2,3,4 the 5 spot is open to competition but realistically there will probably be some injuries or fatigue that require all of these guys contributing. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...