Jump to content

Wow, Kim is untouchable


cm1290

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 732
  • Created
  • Last Reply
No reason not to. I remember most people were down on Aoki. KC had stopped playing him and his defense had declined. But sure lets play hindsight 20/20 if it lets us bash the GM.

I agree, as implied. Hindsight is almost all of what most fans have--I'll continue to use it as long as I'm honest about correcting myself as well. Except that a lot of fans' foresight about Kim seems to agree with Duquette's original optimistic call, fortunately. The Giants' FO does seem to have much better foresight than most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's got a surprisingly fast bat - that was a 97 MPH fastball from Betonces he hit. And he can spoil any type of breaking pitch. When he doesn't use defensive swings, he hits the ball hard. Now, if he can just avoid those weak popups to infielders... I don't see why he can't hit .350 the rest of the way. He might become the toughest guy to SO in the league (Hopefully I didn't jinx him.).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No reason not to. I remember most people were down on Aoki. KC had stopped playing him and his defense had declined. But sure lets play hindsight 20/20 if it lets us bash the GM.

Snider was not a good bet. Nor was Lough. Young is a terrible OF. De Aza was dropped very early (like Gonzo) and went on to hit. Parmelee was a disaster save for a couple games. Every one of those moves blew up. At some point you say he had a terrible offseason instead of saying "Meh, he tried. They were all good moves on paper" No. They were crap moves the offseason after we won the AL East. He was too caught up with the Blue Jays and punted the offseason. That's all there is to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snider was not a good bet. Nor was Lough. Young is a terrible OF. De Aza was dropped very early (like Gonzo) and went on to hit. Parmelee was a disaster save for a couple games. Every one of those moves blew up. At some point you say he had a terrible offseason instead of saying "Meh, he tried. They were all good moves on paper" No. They were crap moves the offseason after we won the AL East. He was too caught up with the Blue Jays and punted the offseason. That's all there is to it.

I disagree about Lough, he was fine in 2014 and there was no reason to think he put up a 50 OPS+ at 29.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snider was not a good bet. Nor was Lough. Young is a terrible OF. De Aza was dropped very early (like Gonzo) and went on to hit. Parmelee was a disaster save for a couple games. Every one of those moves blew up. At some point you say he had a terrible offseason instead of saying "Meh, he tried. They were all good moves on paper" No. They were crap moves the offseason after we won the AL East. He was too caught up with the Blue Jays and punted the offseason. That's all there is to it.
What were the better moves? Were you big on Aoki? Marlon Byrd? Rasmus? I think OF that FA year was pretty much a crapshoot. What name leaps out at you from this list? http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2015-mlb-free-agent-tracker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Right, why not just do the prudent thing and look at the larger sample sizes? See the upward trend? It's pretty nice.  
    • https://www.baseballamerica.com/rankings/2024-top-mlb-draft-prospects/   Baseball America says Brecht too. 
    • Fair enough. I simply looked at the most recent two weeks or 14 games I think (which aside from 1 game are quite underwhelming). I didn't look beyond that. Hopefully he heats back up. Two weeks is already a small enough sample size. I'm sure I could find another mediocre week but I don't really care to go tit for tat with endless cherry picking.
    • Maybe the Orioles could trade Norby as part of a package to the Mariners to land a pitcher. I don't think the Mariners are going to be eager to part with any established veteran pitchers, but Elias might as well do his due diligence and ask.
    • If you start penciling in our top prospects into 2025 and 2026 lineups it starts to look stupid good. One of the problems with trading HUGE prospects for players with a couple of years of control is the price tag to keep them. So we have to pay a huge prospect burden just to pay a huge salary. A replacement for the prospect adds a cost and the extension of the SP adds a cost. Personally, I would hold on to the top prospects and trade from the rest. If I did trade a top guy I would want 3+ years of team control on that SP. But... if Bradish and Kremer are not hurt, we are not having this conversation IMO. We are adding a reliever or two and maybe a RH bat.
    • So if we're being honest he had one bad week, right? The last 7 days are included in the last two weeks.
    • The question was asked somewhere of the Rangers fans, whether they were fine with a terrible season this year if they won the World Series last season. The answer is of course yes it’s OK to have a terrible season in the year after winning a World Series, especially given that that’s exactly what is happening now. I would like to be the Cardinals or the Rays, who have an excellent team every single year, avoid stupid free agent contracts, trade wisely, spend wisely, and draft very well.  With that in mind, as long as as we don’t empty our Farm for rentals, or do stupid Davies-for-Parra trades in a “win everything this season and damn the future,” attitude, I don’t care. When the Jesuit missionaries discovered how to get quinine, which cures and prevents malaria, from the bark of the Chinchona tree, they always planted five trees, in the shape of a cross, for every one they harvested for its bark. So, whoever we trade, we have to acquire quality and quantity replacements for whomever is departing. With that guideline in mind, I don’t care who they trade.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...