Jump to content

Mike Wright's chance is coming


wildcard

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I've always liked Wright better in relief. His biggest issue has always been consistently, sometimes from inning to inning. He has plus stuff when he's letting it loose out of the pen. The only issue is can he be counted on in close games because of his penchant to be inconsistent? 

I also think he has a better makeup for the pen. Keep him busy, don't make him prepare for starts, just put him out in the pen and let him know he could be used on any night. He was 96-98 last night and he change has always been a good pitch. 

I'm done with him as a starter. 

Agree this is where Wright has a chance to be real MLB material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply
13 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

As bad as Asher was last game, I would run him out there for five starts or so and see what we have. Tillman is going nowhere unless he's hurt. We all have to hope he's still shaking off rust but he is concerning.

I know that Wright has been the best of the starters in AAA, and he's probably the best in house current option after Asher, but I'd rather see if he can be the reliever we hope he can be. 

This problem really highlights the amount crapping the bed the likes of Ynoa, Lee, Verrett, Aquino, and Wilson have done in AAA. 

 

Agree.   I also think that if the O's had a good 6th starter Tillman would be put on the DL for shoulder weakness.  Since the O's don't have anyone better Tillman will be allowed to try ini improve in the rotation instead on the DL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Ok, when I have time after work, I'll do it.  But remember, you're asking me who we could get that's better than Wright - who has a 1.42 WHIP in the minors this season and 1.48 career WHIP - in the minors - at age 27.  That's a REALLY low bar.  If I can't come up with at least a couple dozen names, then shame on me.  

That is not the point.  What we need in pitcher with a better chance to winning in the majors than Wright.  His stats at AAA only show that he struggled to start the season.  In the last five game he is 3-1,  2.97 ERA, 1.22 WHIP, averaging  6 innings a start.  Now if you can find pitchers better than that that you think the O's can get then we have something.

Check out Wright's May splits.

http://www.milb.com/player/index.jsp?sid=t568&player_id=605541#/splits/R/pitching/2017/MINORS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ruzious said:

Ok, when I have time after work, I'll do it.  But remember, you're asking me who we could get that's better than Wright - who has a 1.42 WHIP in the minors this season and 1.48 career WHIP - in the minors - at age 27.  That's a REALLY low bar.  If I can't come up with at least a couple dozen names, then shame on me.  

Just remember that you'll be setting yourself up as the goat for whomever you'd have to trade to get him will undoubtedly be a better pitcher than the one you pick up---ala Hadar, Miranda, etc., etc  You'll have a dozen posters jumping on you for trading next year's star for a journeyman.  But maybe we can trade Pedro for Cueto--I hear the Giants  might be listening to offers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

That is not the point.  What we need in pitcher with a better chance to winning in the majors than Wright.  His stats at AAA only show that he struggled to start the season.  In the last five game he is 3-1,  2.97 ERA, 1.22 WHIP, averaging  6 innings a start.  Now if you can find pitchers better than that that you think the O's can get then we have something.

Check out Wright's May splits.

http://www.milb.com/player/index.jsp?sid=t568&player_id=605541#/splits/R/pitching/2017/MINORS

So we ignore his entire minor league career except for his last few starts.  To me, that makes no sense.  Even if it did make sense, the 1.22 WHIP in only okay.  If you're using that as a reason that he's turned things around, I don't buy it.  We're just going to have to completely disagree on this one.  The good thing there is I don't have to make a list of 25 people, because we're coming from completely different beliefs on Wright.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He gave up 3 runs tonight but I don't think that's a true indicator of his performance.  Buck could have pulled him after a successful inning and let him keep building momentum.  Instead he pitched his 3rd inning in 2 days and his FB was 94 instead of 98.  Hart threw a rocket ship to Bradley.  Wright showed 3 pitches again and looked good.  Just a tough single by Vazquez on a good breaking ball, then Hart comes in and serves up a dinger.  

When was the last time Wright pitched on b2b days?

I think he should stay up.  If we need a fresh arm for tomorrow then I would look for Bleier to go out.  But I think we're good for now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

He gave up 3 runs tonight but I don't think that's a true indicator of his performance.  Buck could have pulled him after a successful inning and let him keep building momentum.  Instead he pitched his 3rd inning in 2 days and his FB was 94 instead of 98.  Hart threw a rocket ship to Bradley.  Wright showed 3 pitches again and looked good.  Just a tough single by Vazquez on a good breaking ball, then Hart comes in and serves up a dinger.  

When was the last time Wright pitched on b2b days?

I think he should stay up.  If we need a fresh arm for tomorrow then I would look for Bleier to go out.  But I think we're good for now.  

Agree on all.

We don't need a fresh arm for tomorrow.

We have Ash-baldo to cover at least 5 innings.   Brach, O'Day, Bleier, and GIvens are all rested.  Hart didn't go much so he is probably available too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wright will go down tomorrow because it's Buck's world but I agree, he shouldn't go anywhere.

 

He looked excellent and it should be a role he could really excel at if given a legitimate chance.

 

He looked terrific tonight but was probably pushed a little too far on back to back days because of the big lead.

 

Hart really scares me, I do not trust him AT ALL right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

He gave up 3 runs tonight but I don't think that's a true indicator of his performance.  Buck could have pulled him after a successful inning and let him keep building momentum.  Instead he pitched his 3rd inning in 2 days and his FB was 94 instead of 98.  Hart threw a rocket ship to Bradley.  Wright showed 3 pitches again and looked good.  Just a tough single by Vazquez on a good breaking ball, then Hart comes in and serves up a dinger.  

When was the last time Wright pitched on b2b days?

I think he should stay up.  If we need a fresh arm for tomorrow then I would look for Bleier to go out.  But I think we're good for now.  

Mike Wright has been used as a starter exclusively this year. No relief appearances. As a matter of fact, in his minor league career he's starter 118 games out of the 123 he's pitched in. So 96% of the time, he's starting. 

You have to go back to August 25th and August 26th of last year for the last time he made appearances in back to back days.

  • 8/25 - 1 IP, 1 H, 0 ER
  • 8/26 - 3 IP, 4H, 2 ER

Prior to that? Hasn't been done in the majors. And in the minors I can't imagine it's happened in 7 years considering he's only made 5 relief appearances.

So I have no idea what Buck was thinking there. My only guess is he didn't want to utilize any of his A squad pitchers...which really doesn't make much sense because Ubaldo/Asher are pitching tomorrow...and is there anybody on Earth that thinks either of those guys are going to the leave the game with a lead...let alone a close game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

Mike Wright has been used as a starter exclusively this year. No relief appearances. As a matter of fact, in his minor league career he's starter 118 games out of the 123 he's pitched in. So 96% of the time, he's starting. 

You have to go back to August 25th and August 26th of last year for the last time he made appearances in back to back days.

  • 8/25 - 1 IP, 1 H, 0 ER
  • 8/26 - 3 IP, 4H, 2 ER

Prior to that? Hasn't been done in the majors. And in the minors I can't imagine it's happened in 7 years considering he's only made 5 relief appearances.

So I have no idea what Buck was thinking there. My only guess is he didn't want to utilize any of his A squad pitchers...which really doesn't make much sense because Ubaldo/Asher are pitching tomorrow...and is there anybody on Earth that thinks either of those guys are going to the leave the game with a lead...let alone a close game?

In tomorrow night's matchup, the Oriole starter has a lower season ERA than the Boston starter.

In Asher's 3 starts as an Oriole, he has 2 quality starts.  (Porcello has 6 quality starts out of 11).

Porcello has given up 40 hits in his last 4 starts.

So yes, I think it is very possible that Asher leaves the game with a lead.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LookitsPuck said:

So I have no idea what Buck was thinking there. My only guess is he didn't want to utilize any of his A squad pitchers...which really doesn't make much sense because Ubaldo/Asher are pitching tomorrow...and is there anybody on Earth that thinks either of those guys are going to the leave the game with a lead...let alone a close game?

I assume Buck was thinking, "let's see what Mike Wright is capable of doing," in a situation where it was unlikely to hurt the team.    It made sense to me, though I was a little surprised he sent Wright out for a second inning.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

I know he have up some runs but I felt alright with it.  He didn't pitch as bad as his line.

I'd agree.   He dominated the 8th inning.   In the 9th, he wore down a little.   The pitch Vazquez hit for an RBI single was a good, tight slider that was off the plate.    Just a good swing by Vazquez.   And then Hart allowed the two inherited runners to score.   Overall, I liked the fact that he worked ahead in the count and didn't fool around.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...