Jump to content

Will Edwin Jackson help?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I will disagree with this one.

You can't run a team like that.

You just can't.

You can't be that inflexible.

It just isn't realistic.

If, as you state, he had nothing to learn in the Minors then how would you force him to make the adjustment of "NIBBLING" and not trusting his stuff???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, thezeroes said:

If, as you state, he had nothing to learn in the Minors then how would you force him to make the adjustment of "NIBBLING" and not trusting his stuff???

When did I say that?

I'd love to see a quote of me saying he had nothing to learn in the minors. 

Was I drunk posting back in 2012? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

When did I say that?

I'd love to see a quote of me saying he had nothing to learn in the minors. 

Was I drunk posting back in 2012? 

You stated he was not having any failure in the Minors hence I gathered that you thought that he had nothing to learn.  I should know that you seldom post exactly your thought process and when someone reads something into your posts it gives you more fodder for discourse.  I bit into this and I am sorry I put assumed words in your mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, thezeroes said:

You stated he was not having any failure in the Minors hence I gathered that you thought that he had nothing to learn.  I should know that you seldom post exactly your thought process and when someone reads something into your posts it gives you more fodder for discourse.  I bit into this and I am sorry I put assumed words in your mouth.

I thought I was being clear when I pulled a single line out of your post and said that wouldn't work.

It took prolong failure at the ML level and getting traded to get through to Jake.

Keeping him at AAA wouldn't have done it.

Do I think he was a finished product the first time he was promoted?  Nope.

But I understand that guys get promoted before they are ready all the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, thezeroes said:

The Orioles promoted him, he had some failures at the MLB Level, they sent him bak down and promoted him back up before those failures were corrected.  He never had faced them head on because at the time he was on the forty and the best available arm.  In his mind he knew this and used his demotion more as a rest period instead of a punitive type thing.  By recalling him before things were fixed the Orioles propagated the thought process and extended the learning curve.

My opinion:  Connor and Adair (and maybe Buck) screwed him up during his 2nd/3rd year in the majors.   He was ready enough when he came up and was progressing nicely under Krantz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

My opinion:  Connor and Adair (and maybe Buck) screwed him up during his 2nd/3rd year in the majors.   He was ready enough when he came up and was progressing nicely under Krantz.

Perhaps unfair but for me Buck made a mistake in letting Kranitz go. And I felt that way at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't understand the logic of promoting someone without options given the state of the pitching staff.

This move seemed inevitable.

I won't be surprised if he ends up back in Norfolk.

He had an opt out. They had to make a move one way or another and Hart wasn't pitching well.  I get why they did it. Not like they kept him for a long time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...