Jump to content

O's in discussions with Cubs, Almora Jr appears to be the target.


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

Zach was almost gone at the deadline, do you have no recollection of the shenanigans that went down with the Astros?

Angelos put a stop on that trade going down. Have a feeling that Zach won't be traded this offseason. Will have to see what happens. DD has got to be at his best this offseason. Since the powers that be want to go for all the marbles in 2018. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply
34 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

Zach was almost gone at the deadline, do you have no recollection of the shenanigans that went down with the Astros?

From what I’ve seen, that deal was headlined by Colin Moran, who is not a Hays-level prospect.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Es4M11 said:

Please refresh my memory regarding the prospects that were coming back. None of them were of Hays caliber, right? Also, I thought the key players coming back had injury concerns...

Astros may have had some concerns with Zach. I remember someone saying how stupid the Astros GM was. Yet the Astros won the WS. Sure wish the O's had a different owner and a much better GM. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Just my two cents: stay away from Theo!

Why? Epstein isn't a savant. He's just a good GM who has been the boss in places that have bottomless resources. He's traded away no shortage of talent in his time in Chicago (and in Boston before that), but he could, because he had the assets to replace it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, weams said:

A year of broken Britton is not worth all that much. You would never get a good starter for it. 

But a year of healthy Britton....you are wrong to assume he is injured still headed into 2018...wrong to assume he is healthy too, but you get what I mean.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is one of those moments where the Orioles sit on their thumbs, don't get a deal done, someone else swoops in and trades for the player we were targeting.  Then it comes out that we were so close to a deal but PA wouldn't sign off on it or DD wouldn't throw in something minuscule.

That's what it feels like, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Frobby said:

From what I’ve seen, that deal was headlined by Colin Moran, who is not a Hays-level prospect.    

Well Moran was a top 100 back and n 2014, was a former 1st round pick,  and is also the nephew of BJ Surhoff if that matters.

Moran was at AAA last year at 24 (.900 OPS) and only has about 40 ABs in 2 years of MLB call ups. He technically no longer qualifies as a prospect According to BB reference.

i remember looking at their top 30 around the deadline last year and he was their 4th or 5th best prospect. I sure would like to know the rest of the deal that was vetoed by Sneaky Pete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, foxfield said:

But a year of healthy Britton....you are wrong to assume he is injured still headed into 2018...wrong to assume he is healthy too, but you get what I mean.

 

Yes, the outcome is a coin flip. SO reduce the return by 50%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

He's not a fit.   I'd take a flier on the bat but Dobroff talks about him getting AB's at DH when we already have 3 1B/DH's in Trumbo/Mancini/Davis.

Just the same, with all of the talk about a LH bat, it would not surprise me.   The talk of Almora too.    Gonzalez in LF,  Almora in CF, and Jones in RF.    Trumbo gets turned into a platoon DH with Mancini splitting time between LF and DH?

I view acquiring a LH hitter the same way as I do a LH pitcher.  I don't want a less talented guy taking up a roster spot simply because he is left handed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Ndbarber said:

Wouldn’t Austin Hayes be our starting RFer?

Yeah, I don't see the point of making a trade that results in blocking Hayes - even for 1 year - unless its for a phenom.  Almora is no phenom.  Hayes is more likely to become an all-star level player, imo.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • No one is trading anything close to that for Crochet. But I agree..spend money, not prospects.
    • That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.   Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  
    • That's really the role/opening for next year that we need.  A RHH OF that could play some CF preferably.  Although, I'd lean more to and offensive minded portion of that versus the ability to play CF.  LF is big though at home. I think it's a role that Elias fills through trade, waivers, or maybe even a competition of milb deal types.  Like a RH Sam Hilliard type.  
    • Yeah, he would be good in the Austin Slater role if he was willing to accept it. Not sure that he would be quite as good defensively in CF, given that he has played fewer than 100 innings total in CF since 2021. I highly doubt that he is ready to accept a role as a platoon player though, given that he is not yet 30, and he was an above average starter by rWAR from 2021-23. I doubt he is tendered a contract, given his $6M 2024 salary. His best bet is probably to sign a one year deal with a team that doesn't hope to compete, to attempt to reestablish himself as an everyday player, while the team that signs him can hope to flip him at the trade deadline.
    • I agree. He’d be a great regular season fit in Cinncy’s ballpark. Maybe that confidence of knowing he can hit the ball out to LF at home covers up his other decencies.  As for Crochet… can’t we just resign Burnes?  Crochet would probably cost Holliday, Basallo, and Mayo. Didn’t the deadline teach us the cost of pitching? I’m for trading Mountcastle. I’d hope we can surround the young hitters with a Burnes led staff with adding a vet bat to the DH/1B mix. Other than that, I think we will roll with what we have. And we should. 
    • Hays will want to start somewhere. He shouldn't start for us. We don't want him sitting on the bench looking dejected while Kjerstad and Cowser are mashing bombs onto Eutaw Street.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...