Jump to content

O's interested in OF Preston Tucker


sportsfan8703

Recommended Posts

Tucker was DFA'd by the Astros last friday.  

From mlbtr,

"Although the Orioles are seeking a left-handed hitter, they don’t seem to have interest in free agent Jon Jay, per Kubatko. That differs from previous offseasons when Jay was on the O’s radar, he notes. Conversely, Baltimore could consider Preston Tucker, whom the Astros designated for assignment Friday."

Apparently we've liked him for awhile.  I found this tidbit from mlbtr from two offseasons ago on mlbtr dated March 28th 2016

"The Orioles talked to the Astros about outfielder Preston Tucker this offseason, MASNsports.com’s Roch Kubatko reports.  Talks didn’t go anywhere, however, since Houston asked for Kevin Gausman in return.  Gausman was a popular figure in trade demands over the winter, and as you might expect, the O’s had no interest in dealing the former top prospect.  Tucker didn’t have quite the same prospect pedigree (Gausman was selected fourth overall in 2012 while Tucker was a seventh-rounder in that same draft) but the outfielder posted a very strong .867 OPS over 1530 plate appearances in the minors and hit .243/.297/.437 with 13 homers over 323 PA in the bigs last year as a rookie.  Tucker will serve in a backup role with Houston this season, as his path to more playing time may have been blocked when Colby Rasmus accepted a qualifying offer last fall."

Talk about the trades you don't make.  Now we could pick up Tucker for practically nothing.  DD makes moves like this all the time for bullpen arms from other teams that are out of options, well DD add us a LH OF.  Seems like he got squeezed out by all of HOU's talent and then had a terrible year in SSS in 2016.  Maybe he was pressing and a change of scenery could do wonders.  

When we're talking about saving money, this is how you do it.  Mancini in LF, Jones in CF, with Santander, Tucker, Rickard, Hays, and maybe a vet like Gentry battling it out for two roster spots.  No need to spend millions on Granderson or Smith when they are worse defensively and will cost millions.  

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Please.   That would be awful.   Maybe to a minor league contract.   Santander is better.

One year older than Rickard with a better track record of success in the minors.  I'm talking about for the 4th/5th OF spot.  I just don't see how Rickard is a given on this team.  We obviously liked Tucker before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I see.  So if it's free you don't care if it's any good or not.

He's not completely without value, I don't think. The WAR doesn't look good, but he's only 25 years old.

I'm just saying you could take a flyer on him and give him a ST invite. The O's want lefty bats. Santander is obviously better, but he could get hurt, who knows. Trumbo could get traded. I'm not saying hand the kid a 25-man roster spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I understand it, he's been DFA, not released.  Signing him on a minor league contract isn't an option right now.  We can trade for him or file a claim on him if we want to have him on our 40-man roster, but I don't think either makes a whole lot of sense for the Orioles right now.  If he passes thru waivers, he would probably be outrighted, rather than released, right?  If released, then maybe talk to him about a minor league contract.  I don't see doing much else at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, weams said:

 

Please tell those guys at CamdenDepot that RZNJ is not just a “guy on message board!”  >:(

Granderson 2017: 1.5 rWAR

Tucker 2017: -1.1 rWAR

That’s “not much difference?”    That said, I’m not too high on the Granderson idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Please tell those guys at CamdenDepot that RZNJ is not just a “guy on message board!”  >:(

Granderson 2017: 1.5 rWAR

Tucker 2017: -1.1 rWAR

That’s “not much difference?”    That said, I’m not too high on the Granderson idea.

Is that who he was referring to?

Yeah. There is a difference. Though Curtis does not back up center. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...