Jump to content

Baltimore Baseball: Paul Folkemer review 6 trades of young stars in their walk year


mdbdotcom

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, PaulFolk said:

Great minds think alike! Which players/trades did you cover in your thread?

The OP covered Adrian Gonzalez and Matt Holliday, and requested that posters add others.     I think all of yours got covered, plus a couple of others that didn’t meet your criteria.   But not at the level of detail you supplied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is what DD has been saying for the past few seasons, when asked about it on the radio, about fan interest in trading somebody in their walk year.

He said, generally it doesn't work out well for the sellers.

Which thanks to Frobby & Paul, there are some clear cases out there to support this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TradeAngelos said:

Is 1 out of 5 good? 

 

4 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

Which is what DD has been saying for the past few seasons, when asked about it on the radio, about fan interest in trading somebody in their walk year.

He said, generally it doesn't work out well for the sellers.

Which thanks to Frobby & Paul, there are some clear cases out there to support this.

I wouldn’t say only one in five worked out.   Holliday for CarGo and Street clearly did.    I’d argue Santana for Gomez worked out well, except that the Twins chose to trade Gomez — he produced 16 WAR in the six years he would have been under team control.   Heyward for Miller worked out pretty well — Miller was an all-star worth 3.6 WAR, pitching to a 3.02 ERA in 205 IP and then got traded for a boatload of talent.   The Padres got Anthony Rizzo (26.1 WAR in just under 6 years of service time) in the Adrian Gonzalez trade, but they traded him away to the Cubs a year later.     Really, only the Upton trade didn’t return any significant talent (at least, that’s been proven, though I kind of like Mallex Smith).     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • No one is trading anything close to that for Crochet. But I agree..spend money, not prospects.
    • That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.   Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  
    • That's really the role/opening for next year that we need.  A RHH OF that could play some CF preferably.  Although, I'd lean more to and offensive minded portion of that versus the ability to play CF.  LF is big though at home. I think it's a role that Elias fills through trade, waivers, or maybe even a competition of milb deal types.  Like a RH Sam Hilliard type.  
    • Yeah, he would be good in the Austin Slater role if he was willing to accept it. Not sure that he would be quite as good defensively in CF, given that he has played fewer than 100 innings total in CF since 2021. I highly doubt that he is ready to accept a role as a platoon player though, given that he is not yet 30, and he was an above average starter by rWAR from 2021-23. I doubt he is tendered a contract, given his $6M 2024 salary. His best bet is probably to sign a one year deal with a team that doesn't hope to compete, to attempt to reestablish himself as an everyday player, while the team that signs him can hope to flip him at the trade deadline.
    • I agree. He’d be a great regular season fit in Cinncy’s ballpark. Maybe that confidence of knowing he can hit the ball out to LF at home covers up his other decencies.  As for Crochet… can’t we just resign Burnes?  Crochet would probably cost Holliday, Basallo, and Mayo. Didn’t the deadline teach us the cost of pitching? I’m for trading Mountcastle. I’d hope we can surround the young hitters with a Burnes led staff with adding a vet bat to the DH/1B mix. Other than that, I think we will roll with what we have. And we should. 
    • Hays will want to start somewhere. He shouldn't start for us. We don't want him sitting on the bench looking dejected while Kjerstad and Cowser are mashing bombs onto Eutaw Street.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...