Jump to content

Orioles SOM (State of mind)


pocketRIPKENS

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If the Orioles want to compete next year, I think they should make a serious offer to RA Dickey. He won't require a longterm commitment, and if he's not retiring, he's still shown himself to be an average to slightly above average starter who can eat innings. No real health concerns since he is a knuckleballer. We should be all over him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, crawjo said:

If the Orioles want to compete next year, I think they should make a serious offer to RA Dickey. He won't require a longterm commitment, and if he's not retiring, he's still shown himself to be an average to slightly above average starter who can eat innings. No real health concerns since he is a knuckleballer. We should be all over him. 

I'd love to have Dickey on the O's. He puts up quality starts, which is what this team needs. It'd be a lot of fun to watch a knuckleballer every fifth day. And he seems like a genuinely great person.

But, seems like he's likely retiring. And he'd only apparently consider pitching for the Braves, Reds, or Cardinals - likely since they're close to his Nashville home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

I wouldn’t call the improvement in the starting pitching in 2014 “moderate.”    The starters’ ERA improved from 4.57 to 3.61.    That’s a huge leap.    By contrast, last years’ starters had a 5.70 ERA.  We’d have to make as big a leap as we made in 2014 just to get back to “a bit below average” as opposed to “epicly bad.”

I agree...although "a bit below average" might get us a second wild card spot as opposed to running away with the division as in 2014. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

Maybe this should be called Oriole Hangout SOM, since clearly everybody has their opinion about the players on this team, and those that should be added to the roster.

Is that a bad thing? I'm not encouraging fan hyperbole, but shouldn't a fan base be engaged, informed, and have an idea of where they would like to see their team go in the future?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Luke-OH said:

Is that a bad thing? I'm not encouraging fan hyperbole, but shouldn't a fan base be engaged, informed, and have an idea of where they would like to see their team go in the future?

I prefer to remain oblivious, helps me to cope. :leaving:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

Is that a bad thing? I'm not encouraging fan hyperbole, but shouldn't a fan base be engaged, informed, and have an idea of where they would like to see their team go in the future?

You must admit we run the wide range of opinions here, some have me scratching my head as to what team they actually like. :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://eutawstreetreport.com/orioles-fire-dan-duquette/

I came across this older article. My apologies if its been posted here before, and I am sure it probably was.

It got me to some heavy thinking.

Ive been pro-Buck for quite a while, he has done so much good for this town, but the writer makes some key points about TTP and other Oriole pitching issues.

It also has me rethinking if Brady is really the right person to replace DD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

http://eutawstreetreport.com/orioles-fire-dan-duquette/

I came across this older article. My apologies if its been posted here before, and I am sure it probably was.

It got me to some heavy thinking.

Ive been pro-Buck for quite a while, he has done so much good for this town, but the writer makes some key points about TTP and other Oriole pitching issues.

It also has me rethinking if Brady is really the right person to replace DD.

I've asked this question several times (at least) and never seen much of an answer, but I'll trot it out again:  What has Brady Anderson done that would suggest he could be a successful general manager (or whatever you want to call it) of an MLB team? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

I've asked this question several times (at least) and never seen much of an answer, but I'll trot it out again:  What has Brady Anderson done that would suggest he could be a successful general manager (or whatever you want to call it) of an MLB team? 

He’s big on fitness?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

I've asked this question several times (at least) and never seen much of an answer, but I'll trot it out again:  What has Brady Anderson done that would suggest he could be a successful general manager (or whatever you want to call it) of an MLB team? 

I believe he was being groomed by the organization to take on this role.

Until the O'Day and Trumbo contracts, generally, you heard nothing but praise about Brady and he work for the org.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I mean Adley’s attempted hit vs Witt is a good example. Adley hit it harder…but missed for a few feet. That happens. But even softly hit balls find green…the Os aren’t..others are…like Detroit..like KC vs us. They win on an IF hit, Westburg’s ball is a homer in 28 of 30 parks.   
    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...