Jump to content

The 'Boy Was I Wrong!' Thread


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 222
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • 2 weeks later...
Chris Richards looked like the real deal to me...thought we had 1b solved for many years.....WRONG!

That would be one of mine, too.

I also believed Rodrigo Lopez would be our next true ace after Moose left.

You can put me in the Luis Matos camp.

Guilty of thinking that Gibbons would be our cleanup guy for years.

Thought Mazzilli would be a good manager.

Believed Javy Lopez could repeat his 2003 numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

The last post was one year to this day!

I could have sworn that we were just in this thread only a few months ago... time flys. :D

Well, I 'll get things stated with this>

I truly felt that Jeremy Guthrie was going to entrench himself into our 'staff ace' role this season... Boy Was I Wrong!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last post was one year to this day!

I could have sworn that we were just in this thread only a few months ago... time flys. :D

Well, I 'll get things stated with this>

I truly felt that Jeremy Guthrie was going to entrench himself into our 'staff ace' role this season... Boy Was I Wrong!

I wasn't high on Guts coming into this season... I was high on Pie... and because of that and things I read about him on here, I was ready to trade Reimold for something else of need. Boy was I wrong...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a guy who strikes out just 4.7 batters per 9 ip in 'A' and 'AA' in 2008 isn't ready for the majors early in 2009, right? No, I'm not obsessed with the strikeout. But 4.7K/9ip at 'AA' is REALLY low! And it's one of those stats that tends to get lower as players move up. And the guy had never pitched in 'AAA'. And nobody has sustained success at the majors as a starter with a strikeout level lower than that. You can debate theories on why not. But it doesn't happen.

Oh, and 'AA' lefties hit over .300 against this guy just last year. How's he supposed to pitch against Ortiz, Drew, Varitek, Teixeira, Posada, Cano, Damon, Matsui, Crawford, Pena?? I had hope that he was still improving... maybe he was working on something that kept his K totals down for the time being. Maybe he could develop a way to get lefties out at a greater rate. But he's sure not ready now! Is he?

Brad Bergesen, boy was I wrong!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Right..if the Orioles can trade for Brenton Doyle (my favorite top target), why should we care that his salary is low? Also in that scenario, Mullins is likely gone, so payroll would actually go down I believe. But someone like Bemore wins would still complain because the payroll isn’t where he thinks it should be.
    • From here https://www.mlb.com/orioles/stats/ops/regular-season
    • Where are you getting your stats from that's not correct looking at OPS.
    • On the O's this year, Martinez would have been: 5th in OPS 5th in AVG 6th in HRs in 120 games
    • I think PFF is grading Roquan badly because the safeties behind him are playing like ass and it's making him look bad.  If teams are going to attack him over the middle on crossing routes with WRs (like KC did with Rice) he doesn't really stand much of a chance if the safeties behind him don't throw him a bone.  He's still a huge help in the run game.   In general I think PFF assigns a little too much blame to linebackers on passes over the middle, so unless you're an elite coverage guy at LB it's really hard to grade well.  The flip side to this is that teams probably need to adjust their coverage areas to account for the fact that LBs aren't going to be able to hold down WRs for long.  
    • Thanks. This tells me what my eyes have seen with Roquan. He's been a liability in coverage and the fact that Simpson is ahead of him is not good for our defensive leader. Do you have the PFF grades for offense too?
    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...