Jump to content

Chris Davis 2019 and beyond


Camden_yardbird

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

A while back I thought any trade to get anything for him was best, but I don't think anyone buys a ticket on the Titanic while witnessing it plummet to the bottom of the sea.  Time to release him and eat it.  He can't and shouldn't be a veteran leader on a young team with the level of suck he has demonstrated for the past season or two.  Time to cut bait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, drjohnnyfeva said:

A while back I thought any trade to get anything for him was best, but I don't think anyone buys a ticket on the Titanic while witnessing it plummet to the bottom of the sea.  Time to release him and eat it.  He can't and shouldn't be a veteran leader on a young team with the level of suck he has demonstrated for the past season or two.  Time to cut bait.

Why? Play him until you are trying to win more games than you lose again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, drjohnnyfeva said:

A while back I thought any trade to get anything for him was best, but I don't think anyone buys a ticket on the Titanic while witnessing it plummet to the bottom of the sea.  Time to release him and eat it.  He can't and shouldn't be a veteran leader on a young team with the level of suck he has demonstrated for the past season or two.  Time to cut bait.

They will not cut bait, when he is finally hitting.

Quote

Davis was batting .316 (12-for-38) in his last 10 games

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weams said:

Why? Play him until you are trying to win more games than you lose again. 

Again he's hitting .226 with 7 homers in 150 ABs since the ASB. If he can somehow get to .250-.260 and cut down the strikeouts he's probably something you can live with.

As it is at .226 you'd get 28 homes and 85ish RBI. You could live with that through the contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

God, I feel really lame doing this, but it's something I've noticed. Davis' BA up to .179 and over the last 15 days it's been .298 (albeit it's an empty BA). 

The sad part is, I'm not even being sarcastic. With the season he's had, it's been notable when he has a few two hit games over the course of two weeks. It may be his best stretch of the season. I still hope he crawls out of this hole to at least get the OPS near 750 for a few years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Grt 2BA FL Gator said:

God, I feel really lame doing this, but it's something I've noticed. Davis' BA up to .179 and over the last 15 days it's been .298 (albeit it's an empty BA). 

The sad part is, I'm not even being sarcastic. With the season he's had, it's been notable when he has a few two hit games over the course of two weeks. It may be his best stretch of the season. I still hope he crawls out of this hole to at least get the OPS near 750 for a few years. 

If he gets over .179, he avoids having the lowest BA of any qualified hitter in baseball history (record held by Rob Deer and Dan Uggla).    For his sake, I hope he does.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Again he's hitting .226 with 7 homers in 150 ABs since the ASB. If he can somehow get to .250-.260 and cut down the strikeouts he's probably something you can live with.

As it is at .226 you'd get 28 homes and 85ish RBI. You could live with that through the contract.

No. But it does not matter. You have to pay every penny of it. Let him try to be Matt Kemp for 12 minutes while you rebuild. Certainly not blocking any real first basemen in the org. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/4/2018 at 2:34 AM, OriolesMagic83 said:

Davis just stretched out 1 year of the production the O;s paid for over 2 years.  48 HR/121 RBI sounds pretty good.

In a different time-space continuum than the other O's even though he's never been an Astro.

Must be the reason behind that gentle dazed look in his eyes whenever he sees white-hot spheres falling through the strike zone during re-entry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, weams said:

Why? Play him until you are trying to win more games than you lose again. 

Why? 

There are other players to evaluate and we are going younger. Plus,  personally - which likely doesn't matter to anyone but me - I didn't like what I saw early in the season from him tempermentally when he was frustrated and struggling.  For me, it's not about getting anything out of a bad contract with him, it's about the example he might or might not set.  Both could be negative.  The whole discussion and backtracking about the work he put in during the offseason was enough for me now in not wanting him as a guy the youngsters look to when they struggle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

Again he's hitting .226 with 7 homers in 150 ABs since the ASB. If he can somehow get to .250-.260 and cut down the strikeouts he's probably something you can live with.

As it is at .226 you'd get 28 homes and 85ish RBI. You could live with that through the contract.

Not that this year is a good example, but did any of that production since the ASB contribute to wins?  Not that there have been many "clutch" situations this year, but how much of that production was meaningful?  Maybe it's not fair to ask with such overall suckitude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, drjohnnyfeva said:

Why? 

There are other players to evaluate and we are going younger. Plus,  personally - which likely doesn't matter to anyone but me - I didn't like what I saw early in the season from him tempermentally when he was frustrated and struggling.  For me, it's not about getting anything out of a bad contract with him, it's about the example he might or might not set.  Both could be negative.  The whole discussion and backtracking about the work he put in during the offseason was enough for me now in not wanting him as a guy the youngsters look to when they struggle.

Why? Because the Orioles do not need to fill that position with anyone better until they are ready to compete. And try as he will, Bobby Dickerson is not making Mancini into a slick fielder. He is a DH. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I certainly wouldn’t be surprised if he changed nothing in terms of strategy.  Look at what he traded recently right handed batters. I feel like it is more important to him to be innovative, and develop players that have been forgotten or have failed in the major leagues than it is to actually win a World Series. Obviously, that’s the end goal of all the things he’s doing, but he wants to do it in a way that looks innovative, and it looks like he knows more about the players that failed and how to fix them than any other person. I honestly believe that is why Hyde has been here so long. He does everything that he’s told and they don’t want to bring in a manager that won’t do that. I wouldn’t be surprised if he has a lineup made up for him every day and I also wouldn’t be surprised if the whole game plan was planned out for him. What do you do when and where.. Obviously the numbers mean a lot in baseball and are extremely  helpful but they’re not everything. 
    • I'll celebrate whoever we get in a high echelon of MLB talent, but unfortunately unpacking this season too soon I think I don't even really want to win the Burnes bidding. Elias will value the next half season of information on Felix, Grayson and Bradish to figure out who goes with Eflin.     The growth he showed this year winning the Burnes and Eflin trade markets adds confidence he'll staff the top of the pitching roster appropriately in July 2025. If he is very risk averse with Kremer, Povich and Suarez, people would flip out but people like Kyle Gibson, Patrick Corbin and Jose Quintana hit me as safe innings he might actually pursue.
    • The team's valuation only matters at time of sale. The owner's wealth in an uncapped sport like MLB determines how much the team can spend. Steve Cohen by any metric available has tons more millions to SPEND than Hal Steinbrenner. Steve Cohen has even operated at a deficit over 100 million before which I believe was in 2023. And most importantly he has the WILL to get into the deepest of pools when it comes to FA as he has already shown in his short time owning the Mets.
    • I think Bregman would be an awesome fit. I don’t know how you decide westburg/JH and who plays second, but Bregman would be that veteran RH hitter who has experience and enjoys the big moment. Maybe we try JH at CF officially. Maybe he’s super utility next year, but that would be a weird way to develop a #1 prospect. but I would love it if we got Bregman. 
    • The Musgrove deal was viewed as a team-friendly hometown discount extension at the time.
    • Richest owner and richest team are different things. If you go by most valuable teams the Yankees are very high up there. If you go by richest owner it's the Clippers owner.
    • It's actually the Cowboys but I don't think they need any pitching.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...