Jump to content

2019 Trade Deadline


sportsfan8703

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

So we're really just talking about O'Day's salary since Gausman would have been traded either way. And you think the team is so strapped financially that they needed O'Day's $9M to cover everything you mentioned? The Orioles aren't a small market team, they're a mid-market team. They should have had the dollars to invest in everything you mentioned even with O'Day on the payroll. And a $100M payroll isn't what it used to be. It basically puts you in the bottom third in terms of payroll in this era.  

I wouldn't think they would have to sell draft picks to pay for Webb and Matusz but they did.

It certainly looks to me as if the vast majority of funds made available by ownership were going toward ML payroll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 907
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I really want one of Atlanta's 21 year old pitchers. I don't care what it takes. It's already looking like our pitching staff might be the thing that carry's us into our next playoff run. If we could add another 21 year old stud pitcher to go along with Gray Rod and DHall with the Bowie Boys filling in and the potential of a starter coming from next draft 1st round. We'd really be rolling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

ERA by outing for Givens,

1P or less - 2.81 ERA

More than 1IP - 5.33 ERA

Hyde has rode him hard.

 

Givens also has a .926 opponents OPS in late and close situations this season. Opponents also have a line of .302/.394/.679 against him in one run and tie game situations. He's not a guy you want out there trying to get big outs in high leverage situations and I'm sure contending teams are aware of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TINSTAAPP said:

Givens also has a .926 opponents OPS in late and close situations this season. Opponents also have a line of .302/.394/.679 against him in one run and tie game situations. He's not a guy you want out there trying to get big outs in high leverage situations and I'm sure contending teams are aware of that.

His value stinks right now and I kind of won't hear otherwise. The extra year of control is nice, but what is he if he's not a late inning reliever? He's just a guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Just because the team was not built to be competitive does not mean they are not trying to win each game.

They have been a bit better than I expected. I'm pleasantly surprised with the performance of some of the unknown players as well.

 

I don't think there's going to be a trade made that can greatly alter the rebuild though. That's the most disappointing aspect for me now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, interloper said:

His value stinks right now and I kind of won't hear otherwise. The extra year of control is nice, but what is he if he's not a late inning reliever? He's just a guy. 

Givens value isn't going to be very good. Teams that are contending for the playoffs are going to view Givens as a guy who can start the 6th or 7th inning. But they aren't likely to view him as the guy to bring in when their two runners on base and only one out in the inning. There are a lot of pitchers who can handle low leverage situations and they aren't worth that much in a trade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, interloper said:

His value stinks right now and I kind of won't hear otherwise. The extra year of control is nice, but what is he if he's not a late inning reliever? He's just a guy. 

I think they'd be wise to try and package him.  I mentioned this earlier in the thread, but Mancini/Givens to Atlanta seems to make sense on a lot of levels. Maybe I'm wrong, but I feel like that should be enough to at least get them to talk about including one of their 21 year old pitching prospects. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

I think they'd be wise to try and package him.  I mentioned this earlier in the thread, but Mancini/Givens to Atlanta seems to make sense on a lot of levels. Maybe I'm wrong, but I feel like that should be enough to at least get them to talk about including one of their 21 year old pitching prospects. Thoughts?

I don't see the Braves.  I don't think they want him in the outfield and I don't think they would want to trade for someone whose cost will be inflated by extra years of team control that I don't think Atlanta covets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildbillhiccup said:

I think they'd be wise to try and package him.  I mentioned this earlier in the thread, but Mancini/Givens to Atlanta seems to make sense on a lot of levels. Maybe I'm wrong, but I feel like that should be enough to at least get them to talk about including one of their 21 year old pitching prospects. Thoughts?

It is at least worth calling the Braves and see if they are willing to talk. There is only one top contender in the NL and that is the Dodgers. The Braves barring a collapse have a good chance at a playoff run this year. Acquiring Mancini with Markakis out would be a big help and Givens can add bullpen depth. 

The question is are the Braves ready to go all in on a run, and how badly to they want a pitcher like Givens who cannot be trusted in high leverage situations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, interloper said:

 

Texas is looking for controllable bats and is considering Mancini, meanwhile all I hear around here is that there's no way Mancini can be a part of the next good Orioles team and that he's too old or something.

And why would a smart, well run team like the Rays be considering him, too?  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Texas is looking for controllable bats and is considering Mancini, meanwhile all I hear around here is that there's no way Mancini can be a part of the next good Orioles team and that he's too old or something.

And why would a smart, well run team like the Rays be considering him, too?  

 

Ummm...because those teams are already good? Seems pretty obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Texas is looking for controllable bats and is considering Mancini, meanwhile all I hear around here is that there's no way Mancini can be a part of the next good Orioles team and that he's too old or something.

And why would a smart, well run team like the Rays be considering him, too?  

 

Well, because they have a chance to win a World Series this year, basically, and he'd help out a lot with that. 

For the record I think Trey COULD be a part of the next good O's team (no one has ever qualified what "good" means, either). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I didn't watch a pitch Sunday after that Saturday debacle. I had a charity ride to attend anyways, but I was not wasting a Sunday on this 2024 squad.  I'll probably watch some of the Yankees game, but my heart is out of this squad. I still want them to win, but they have given me no reason since May to think this team has any special abilities.  Injuries hurt them for sure, but they just don't have that "it" factor. They have the choke factor down pat though. I can deal with a bad team. Hell, I ran this place through the darkest, leanest years.  But what I can't deal with is an anti-clutch team. This is a team that can look victory in the face and find a way to lose. This is team with no ability to finish off a comeback.  Hell, even in their walk offs it's after their relievers choked away a lead.  The lack of hitting is boring. The lack of situational hitting is boring. The strikeout/homerun all or nothing approach is boring. The fact that they no longer steal bases or put pressure on the defense unless you count Masolino getting guys thrown out by 10 feet, is boring. The fact that both of their super prospects not came up did poorly, but literally crapped the bed and hit like pitchers is boring.  The fact that both of their number one overall selections have been either bad or awful is boring.  The fact that the "TOR" they picked up this offseason took a month and half "off" is boring. The fact that the Orioles still have Jimenez and Rivera on this team is boring.  It's just a boring team.  I'm just not interested in this 2024 squad and have zero faith in them that they can do anything in the playoffs. Even against the Royals (who will run all over the Orioles if they play them) or Twins, I don't give them much of a chance.  I'll never root against an Orioles team, and I hope that some miracle happens and they suddenly become a better team. But I will continue to say that this has been one of the most frustrating Orioles Playoff teams of all time. 
    • Now that Snyder has gone I can passively hope they do well. They should have kept the old name (Washington Football Team).
    • Daniels just completed a pass for 55 yards thru the air.  The guy has a heck of an arm.  Commanders look like a good team again and are dominating an 0-2 Bengals team that is desperate for a win.  21-10 in 2nd quarter.  
    • Westburg is the guy I'd want to run a bit more, he seems a bit more like a heady type player so I could see his instincts growing there, and he had decent numbers in the minors. He's had an interesting year in the SB department, stole 4/5 in the month of April, then 1/3 in May and 1/1 in June, but hasn't had a straight steal since June 3rd. Wonder if moving up in the lineup killed his run game?
    • Or a guy that can just come up and give innings when the bullpen is shot after a doubleheader or even give a spot start and then be sent back down.  Is Pham a likely future ML starter, no, but he might bail the O's out of a pitching bind multiple times next year.  
    • Saturday's game was epically bad and not the type of loss a team on the upswing into the playoffs would suffer and one that I certainly hate to witness. I couldn't watch most of the game Sunday, but I wouldn't DVR it and then peek at the score either, I don't think that I would ever watch if I knew the outcome of a game in advance. The surprise elation (Gunnar's bases loaded double) and the agony of the non-send and inability to hit a sac fly is what keeps me coming back, old fool that I am.
    • Predicting what the attendance will do next year is like predicting Hurrican season in January.  There are so many outside factors that it is just a guess.  How will they finish the year, how much will the spend in the offseason, how many corporations want to get ticket plans,   how is the economy in 6 months, how do they play next season what teams we play and when, will teams like Red Sox, Yankees and big draws play well.   I also think one of the biggest factors is what corporations want to sponsor give aways and what time of promotions will they run.  If you look at attendance some of the largest attendance games minus the Phillies, Yankees games are for the best giveaway souvenirs.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...