Jump to content

Aaron Brooks selected by O's off the waiver wire


wildcard

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Philip said:

I’m curious about the new guy’s upside? He hasn’t any options, so he clogs the roster. What good things does he have?

We didn’t pick him up on a whim, (hopefully that reason walked out the door with last fall’s departures.) So what are his advantages?

He's someone else.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

This meant for the trade deadline thread? I would agree... cashner’s market just got a lot hotter. 

 Yeah, I should’ve put it in a different comment area. I am extremely gratified by what Mike is doing now. He is anticipating movies and preparing for those moves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What’s his spin rate?  Can we sprinkle analytics on him and make him strictly FB/CB?  

IMO, we just really need to cover innings. Elias is trying. He basically went out and got two of the “best” pitchers in the international league. Brooks has had success in the PCL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Philip said:

 Yeah, I should’ve put it in a different comment area. I am extremely gratified by what Mike is doing now. He is anticipating movies and preparing for those moves.

I mean I like Elias and all, but picking up guys from the waiver wire isn’t exactly high level chess. He’s been doing this all season and will continue to do it if there’s a chance of upgrading the pitching staff regardless of pending trades. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brooks is starting game 1 today. He’s out options. It’s a double header and then pen was taxed last night, Brooks might be DFAd before game 2. 

While that would be hilarious, I’d also like to see this team stumble onto at least one SP with all the guys we’ve ran out there. Chris Waters?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

 

75% of the outs that Brooks recorded [6 out of 8] came via the Groundout and the Strikeout.

The one base-runner that he ceded via a Hit Batsman was erased on a double play, hence he faced the minimum number of batters (8) on the day.

 

 

8 OUTS: ) 3 Groundouts (Including 1 Double Play), 2 Strikeouts, 2 Flyouts

 

 

AARON LEE BROOKS ))))))) (vs. D-RAYS, 7/13) )))))) [GAME ONE]

IP:lll2.67

H:llll 0 )) 

R:lllll 0

BB:ll0 ) *

SO:lll2

Pitches: )l 32(17)Strikes, )15 )Balls)

2019 ERA: )l 4.75 )l) 53.00 IP  (28 ER)

2019 WHIP: )l 1.189 )l )  53.00 IP  (63 H/BB)

2019 OPPONENTS BATTING AVG: )l .240 ))  (49 for 204)

 

* )) Brooks had 1 Hit Batsman

 

PITCHES BY INNING

*******************

91 ll(4 llStrikes, lll5 lllBalls)

11 ll(7 llStrikes, lll4 lllBalls)

12 ll(6 llStrikes, lll6 lllBalls) )) **

 

** )) Brooks recorded 2 outs before departing in the 3rd inning.

 

o

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

75% of the outs that Brooks recorded [6 out of 8] came via the Groundout and the Strikeout.

The one base-runner that he ceded via a Hit Batsman was erased on a double play, hence he faced the minimum number of batters (8) on the day.

 

 

8 OUTS: ) 3 Groundouts (Including 1 Double Play), 2 Strikeouts, 2 Flyouts

 

 

AARON LEE BROOKS ))))))) (vs. D-RAYS, 7/13) )))))) [GAME ONE]

IP:lll2.67

H:llll 0 )) 

R:lllll 0

BB:ll0 ) *

SO:lll2

Pitches: )l 32(17)Strikes, )15 )Balls)

2019 ERA: )l 4.75 )l) 53.00 IP  (28 ER)

2019 WHIP: )l 1.189 )l )  53.00 IP  (63 H/BB)

2019 OPPONENTS BATTING AVG: )l .240 ))  (49 for 204)

 

* )) Brooks had 1 Hit Batsman

 

PITCHES BY INNING

*******************

91 ll(4 llStrikes, lll5 lllBalls)

11 ll(7 llStrikes, lll4 lllBalls)

12 ll(6 llStrikes, lll6 lllBalls) )) **

 

** )) Brooks recorded 2 outs before departing in the 3rd inning.

 

o

o

 

Brooks could make Bundy's start on Wednesday against the Nationals.

 

https://twitter.com/masnRoch/status/1150139215524618240o

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Clearly he has a roster spot for a playoff series with the Yankees….
    • My stance would be pretty simple. Im not trading any of the top 3 prospects and im not trading any of the young talent that is controlled long term that is currently on the ML roster. That means besides the very obvious guys that players like Cowser and Kjerstad are also off the board. Now, if a player like Skubal becomes available, that could cause me to change my mind but as I look around at the reported available players, I don’t see anyone worth a top 20 prospect or young contributing ML talent. Guys like Norby and Stowers fall into that latter category but they aren’t here right now and they are just redundant on our roster. So I’m telling teams if you want to deal with us, guys like Norby, Stowers and Beavers are who will lead deals and that several vets, led by Mountcastle, are also on the board in any potential contender/contender(fringe contender) type deal. I think whether it’s Fedde or relievers like Estevez or Nardi or Garcia or even Scott, I think we have enough to get deals done without trading any of the guys we would rather not lose. This is all to say that I just don’t see that proven elite high end talent available this deadline to justify trading any of those top guys.
    • He’s an interesting test case. Prior to 2023, wasn’t good. In 2023, he threw around 200 innings iirc in the KBO and learned the sweeper. Now he is pitching much better. His statcast stats are pretty good although he’s not missing bats or getting Ks and he has a tendency to give up some hard contact.  
    • I don’t think he can be counted on for that. If you can get him cheap fine but his career WAR is 3.5 and he has 3.7 this year. Plus he’s 33 innings short of his career high …did 120-130 range twice. How could that be your acquisition that can be counted on when he could quite possibly run out of gas? Or get to a team where performance matters and feel the pressure versus pitching for the White Sox…A horrid team that everyone knew was going to suck.
    • Yea but how are you defining that?  Is Fedde a #3 or better, for example?
    • With all due respect … I think you are counting on Mayo to come up and immediately perform. I don’t think it’s realistic… possible yes. But, most guys have an adjustment. If it’s one thing we’ve seen from Hyde is the reluctance to give regular time to the rookies. Didn’t see it with Stowers, Norby, etc. They did  give it to Holliday but I think there was pressure being put on him to do so.  You think he would replace Urias who doesn’t play everyday with Mayo and sit the other guys to play him every day which is what a player needs during that adjustment period? 
    • Roch retweeted this. Lots of fans are speculating that it means Watkins is coming back to the Os. It makes some sense as we need fresh arms.  His numbers aren’t great this year but not sure that is going to matter.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...