Jump to content

2019 #5 Prospect Austin Hays - CF


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Because I think he has a very unusual career arc.

Oh, I wasn't even thinking about their career arcs,  just their skillsets and approach to the game. I don't see how players can be comped for results before they create them.

I could be misremembering this, but didn't Finley hurt his shoulder leaping for a ball at the wall in his first game as an Oriole and miss a few weeks? The way Finley played with reckless abandon, and speed, and a plus arm while putting up good offensive numbers. That's how I thought they were comparable.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mdbdotcom said:

Oh, I wasn't even thinking about their career arcs,  just their skillsets and approach to the game. I don't see how players can be comped for results before they create them.

I could be misremembering this, but didn't Finley hurt his shoulder leaping for a ball at the wall in his first game as an Oriole and miss a few weeks? The way Finley played with reckless abandon, and speed, and a plus arm while putting up good offensive numbers. That's how I thought they were comparable.

 

I guess as a style of player I can see similarities.  But I personally would have picked someone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Ohfan67 said:

I don't know what percentage of likelihood outcome is considered "ceiling" in scouting reports, but I think the odds of Austin having a three or four year run as good Adam's best years are really, really low. Like basically zero.

It doesn't seem out of the question for Hays to have a 3-4 year run like Jones'. Putting up the same 10-year run is what's near impossible.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Matos did have a 4 WIN season as a 24-year old but they soon found the holes in his swing. He never really had the minor league success that Hays had. Matos career minor league slash 268/.331/.389/.719 pales in comparison to Hays' so far .286/.327/.508/.835.

That was in the Orioles loopy phase.  I looked up Matos' minor league record earlier today and it doesn't make a lot of sense.  They called him up at 21 to start for the O's after 50 games of a .740 OPS at Bowie.  On a 74-win team. The Thrift years were strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SilverRocket said:

It doesn't seem out of the question for Hays to have a 3-4 year run like Jones'. Putting up the same 10-year run is what's near impossible.

Jones is a bit overrated here.   His career OPS+ is 106, and his best 5-year run was 116.    That’s good, but not elite.    I loved what he did here, but it’s not like he’s some near Hall of Famer.   Among active position players he’s 39th in WAR.   18 of those players are his age or younger, and 28 have played as many seasons or fewer.

Now, do I expect Hays to top his career WAR?    Not really.    Is it nearly impossible?    I wouldn’t say that.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Frobby said:

Well, we are discussing ceiling here, not probabilities.    Jones, to me, never quite reached his own ceiling, because he wasn’t able to completely win his battle with plate discipline.    He’s had a great career, but 106 OPS+ might certainly be exceeded by Hays if he maxes out.   In short, I’d say Hays does have a Jones-like ceiling.     Reaching that ceiling won’t be easy, though.   

Is “maxed out” the same as ceiling? If there’s a 1% chance it happens then is that ceiling? 2%? I’m curious how people rate this. I think of ceiling as a more realistic or higher probability outcome. Like maybe 10%. 
 

What percentage of outfielders do you think retire with an OPS+ less than 100? Would you be surprised if it was more than 50%? Significantly more? Centerfielders with 14 years of experience?

I think you guys are being wildly optimistic about Hays. As you pointed out, this year’s OH evaluation of Hays is in many ways its rosiest evaluation ever of Hays, yet he was hurt a lot this year and his performance In the minor leagues was disappointing. Seems overly optimistic to me.  And I think the fun glimpse of Austin in September has most posters feeling warm and fuzzy. Understandable, but that doesn’t change the fundamentals of Hays projection. 

I just find the Jones comparison really off. Jones was in the big leagues at 20, was an all star at 23 and had 1000 ML at bats at the end of his age 23 season. Jones was a five time All Star. Is there a realistic chance that Hays will have five all star quality seasons? I think there’s almost zero chance that will happen. One all star level season? Like maybe 2%. Likewise with 32 career WAR. I think 12 career WAR would be a really good, maybe even great outcome for Hays. Jones has produced 5.5 when he was 23. I like Hays and don’t want to sound like I am hating on him, but he’s turning 25 next summer and hasn’t proven he can stick in the majors next season. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SilverRocket said:

It doesn't seem out of the question for Hays to have a 3-4 year run like Jones'. Putting up the same 10-year run is what's near impossible.

I think it’s very, very low probability. Jones produced five all star seasons. Hays is going to produce five all star quality seasons? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

Jones is a bit overrated here.   His career OPS+ is 106, and his best 5-year run was 116.    That’s good, but not elite.    I loved what he did here, but it’s not like he’s some near Hall of Famer.   Among active position players he’s 39th in WAR.   18 of those players are his age or younger, and 28 have played as many seasons or fewer.

Now, do I expect Hays to top his career WAR?    Not really.    Is it nearly impossible?    I wouldn’t say that.   

Yes, it’s nearly impossible. I think you would be shocked if you calculated the probability that a player Hays age, games played in the minors the past two years, career games played in the majors, etc., producing 32 WAR. Nick Markakis has 33. Is Hays going to have a better career than Nick? Nick had 6.7 WAR at 23. 
 

I’m  not trying to be combative, but I think you guys are way off on this one. 
 

p.s.  Adam Jones is 499th in career WAR. He’s clearly among the damn good baseball players. That what I said to myself as I scrolled through the list and read the names with 32 career WAR. Damn good really starts in the 20s WAR wise. Tons of players that had damn good careers. That list is a fun reminder of just how hard/low probability it is to have a career that generates 25+ WAR. 
 

p.p.s.  Turns out there are a lot more players that generated 32ish WAR that didn’t really produce any WAR until they were 25 or 26 than I thought. So maybe I’m just pessimistic and full of baloney. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I doubt Ortiz will have an 800+ OPS all year but I guess its possible. Right now the trade looks like a win for both teams. Milwaukee of course gets 5 more years after this to fully reap the benefits. 
    • Probably because of pitch count. Doesn’t change my point. 
    • Robert would be a significant upgrade over Mullins (offensively). Not sure how much of a difference the two have defensively. But as much as I like Mullins, he has been really bad with the bat in his hand for about a season now. Second half of last season and most of the first half of this season. Obviously the issue with Robert is his health/availability, so there would be risk there. But I wouldn't mind if Elias took a swing there, as long as this wouldn't be his only move. I would like to see Elias act bold and decisively this go round (at the deadline). I heard that the CHI SOX wanted a "Soto like" package (that the Nats got for trading him to the Pads) back for Robert. We know that they have a recent history of over asking on players they are in theory willing to trade. Anybody have a guess on what the realistic costs for Robert would be?
    • This is all correct. And to add to it, If Gunnar only continues being this version of Gunnar, he is out-valued only by the sole two-way player in baseball (Ohtani). So, comparing Soto to Gunnar in a vacuum might make some sense, their situations are vastly different. The closeness of the young guys has been well documented and we know that the group of Adley, Gunnar, Mountcastle, Stowers, Westy and Cowser are all strong in their faith. I do believe that will play some part in the contract finagling. I do not know any of them personally and with the union, the pressure of the sport, endorsements, etc. etc. ... I realize that at the end of the day guys are going to want what they are worth but I have long thought two things about this crop of players: they are incredibly consistent but they also seem to be genuinely good kids who want to win and put the team first. We don't know yet what will happen over the next few years with these players but I wouldn't be surprised to see a version of what the cast of Friends did early in the show's run, where they essentially formed their own union of sorts and structured their compensation so that none of them would become bigger than the sum of their parts. Again, I don't know them personally and I am fully in-tune with the idea that they all want to be paid but I think that their closeness means more to them than Soto's relationship with his teammates in Washington, and I think that holds true with respect to almost literally any other free agent in the history of the game. They are very unique in that they have this young group who are all 23 - 27 right now who are very tight. I happen to think that the stars of this team will be more inclined to consider more team-friendly deals if it means that their posse can stay in-tact for a longer duration of time. Call me naïve but that's how I see it. I've been intimately involved in the game at various levels myself and I can honestly say that I can't remember a group of young players who demonstrated a caring for each other to the same level of these kids. It could mean nothing when Gunnar is being thrown half a billion dollars or when Adley is offered the moon but I just don't see these players being as motivated by money as other (especially recent) stars.  I agree 100% that Gunnar would jump all over that Witt Jr. deal. I think he is smart enough to know that anything could happen over the next five years. Plus $288 million is a shitload of money. I don't know how  many generations of wealth that is but damn that's a lot of money for a soon to be 23 year old kid.   
    • There is a lot to like and I can't see why nobody would want him but for the possibility that he won't help the team much in October 2024, the cost would probably be an absurd ask.
    • I think the focus is going to be on relief pitching.   I don't think any of the guys SG listed would be needed for the types of relievers the O's will be going after.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...