Jump to content

Mount Sportsmore


NJOriolesFan

Recommended Posts

Ray Lewis has to be on there if it is a Mt. Sportsmore of Baltimore. I think the argument should be more of Brooks vs. Palmer. Sure, Palmer and Brooks were players on a bunch of World Series teams and they were great. But when it comes to what they actually meant to sports in Baltimore as a whole, I don't think it is as much as Lewis, who was the franchise player and brought us a Super Bowl after football came back to Baltimore. Because of the extenuating circumstances of putting Baltimore back on the map as a football town, I give the nod to Ray. I also agree that there should be balance between football and baseball, and having Unitas and Lewis is a testament to both eras of Baltimore football.

Granted I am young, so my opinions are probably clouded by that view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 203
  • Created
  • Last Reply
That's a great way of putting it. Even though Palmer was an unquestionably great player, the common fan (i.e. not people who spend a significant portion of their lives obsessing over the technicalities of baseball but the average Baltimore resident who roots for the local teams out of civic pride) never seemed to identify with him like they do with some players. I get the impression that he came across as aloof and a little too "Hollywood" for Baltimore and its blue collar ethos. He still does. I think if you were going to build a huge monumental statue, you'd need to consider who the top four are in the hearts of the local masses rather than who the best actual players were.

Yeah, but just as long as we don't have 4 whiteys on Baltimore's Mount Sportsmore ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO, he was at the wrong place at the wrong time.

He payed out quite a large settlement and was found guilty of a misdemeanor of obstructing justice to be just an innocent bystander who was in the wrong place at the wrong time.

He didn't do it. However, Pacman Jones, didn't necessarily do any shooting. The guys he hung with did the real crime. Pacman is evil but Ray Lewis is an innocent bystander? I know I'l get flamed for this but it had to be said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a great way of putting it. Even though Palmer was an unquestionably great player, the common fan (i.e. not people who spend a significant portion of their lives obsessing over the technicalities of baseball but the average Baltimore resident who roots for the local teams out of civic pride) never seemed to identify with him like they do with some players. I get the impression that he came across as aloof and a little too "Hollywood" for Baltimore and its blue collar ethos. He still does. I think if you were going to build a huge monumental statue, you'd need to consider who the top four are in the hearts of the local masses rather than who the best actual players were.

I totally agree. And for that reason, Ray beats Palmer. It's close, but you also should have it even between football and baseball, and also, although I usually hate to do this, you have to take race into the equation. It'd be pretty uncomfortable for a majority-black city to have all white dudes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who do you remove from Detroit?

I think Cobb, Sanders and Louis have to stay. I wanted to represent hockey in this, as much as possible. I agree about Kaline but in some cases 4 isn't enough.

You want to remove one of the first HOF inductees for Al Kaline? I'm not sure people really appreciate just how good Cobb was. It would be crazy to take him off the list before Joe Louis, wouldn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But what will people be saying when Ray Lewis is retired for 10 years? To have relevence years after you stop playing is what really makes somebody's career remarkable. Lewis will have his place in history and in Baltimore lore but it is hard to compare the love you have for somebody who is current to someone many have never seen play.

They will say that he helped bring football back to Baltimore, which transcends his accomplishments on the field (even though they were also great). If Palmer or Brooks had played on the early Orioles teams in the 1950s, then it would be a comparable situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but just as long as we don't have 4 whiteys on Baltimore's Mount Sportsmore ;)

New York is largely african-american and hispanic. A real melting pot, if ever there was one.

However, would anyone argue that New York's Mt. Sportsmore shouldn't include Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig, Joe DiMaggio and Mickey Mantle? It is an all-white all-baseball monument but nonetheless it would probably be the people's cherce (Brooklyneese for choice).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He payed out quite a large settlement and was found guilty of a misdemeanor of obstructing justice to be just an innocent bystander who was in the wrong place at the wrong time.

He didn't do it. However, Pacman Jones, didn't necessarily do any shooting. The guys he hung with did the real crime. Pacman is evil but Ray Lewis is an innocent bystander? I know I'l get flamed for this but it had to be said.

To compare Ray Lewis to Pacman is borderline absurd. Ray was in the "wrong place at the wrong time" ONE TIME. Pacman finds himself in those situations seemingly on a nightly basis. Ray has completely cleaned up his image, whether you believe he's a saint or not. He admitted to running with the wrong crowd, and he has said that he totally changed who he hangs out with. He absolutely messed up. And, the "large" settlement isn't so large to him. I'm sure he would gladly give that money to make the trial go away. If anything, Ray Lewis is the "anti-Pacman". He made a mistake, learned from it, is outspoken about his life changes, and he's a (seemingly) better person now. Pacman is a bum.

(All of that Ray Lewis love came from a Redskin fan too...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New York is largely african-american and hispanic. A real melting pot, if ever there was one.

However, would anyone argue that New York's Mt. Sportsmore shouldn't include Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig, Joe DiMaggio and Mickey Mantle? It is an all-white all-baseball monument but nonetheless it would probably be the people's cherce (Brooklyneese for choice).

I was being sarcastic ;)

BTW, it sucks that the NY monument would have 4 Yankees. Gross. Gotta mix it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You want to remove one of the first HOF inductees for Al Kaline? I'm not sure people really appreciate just how good Cobb was. It would be crazy to take him off the list before Joe Louis, wouldn't it?

Who ever said anything about removing Cobb?

I said Cobb, Sanders and Louis should all stay on there. Heck, Joe Louis was a boxer so his events took place in many venues. He never really had a home field. He didn't play hockey or basketball, yet the arena is still named the Joe Louis Arena. Kaline would have to be on there instead of Orr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who ever said anything about removing Cobb?

I said Cobb, Sanders and Louis should all stay on there. Heck, Joe Louis was a boxer so his events took place in many venues. He never really had a home field. He didn't play hockey or basketball, yet the arena is still named the Joe Louis Arena. Kaline would have to be on there instead of Orr.

Turns out I can't read...my mistake.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New York is largely african-american and hispanic. A real melting pot, if ever there was one.

However, would anyone argue that New York's Mt. Sportsmore shouldn't include Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig, Joe DiMaggio and Mickey Mantle? It is an all-white all-baseball monument but nonetheless it would probably be the people's cherce (Brooklyneese for choice).

That's true, but Baltimore is different. Ray and Palmer are very close, IMO. Palmer did more individually and collectively, but the question isn't necessarily "best", but rather "most beloved". Ray is by far more beloved than Palmer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I would add that Mountcastle and Urias were also losses to the offense.  Throw in a couple of slumps to our other regulars, creating 4-5 weak spots in the offense, and that's a lot to overcome.  I don't discount the mental part of hitting, but I do think most of our problems are directly linked to the rash of injuries we've suffered.  
    • Just my opinion. ZiPS projects him for a .708 OPS next year and I'd bet on the under. I think he's a .230/.295/.395 hitter with a below average glove. A Rio Ruiz type of player.
    • We have to keep Irvin "pumped up."  When he's "deflated" he's just no good.  🤣
    • There just seems to be some sort of disconnect between upper management, coaching and the players right now. Do I know that for sure? Obviously no. But with the dropoff we've seen in offensive production something is off here. They literally have been mediocre since the All Star break. And the only big loss on the offensive side is Westburg. 
    • There are no answers, only Zuul. But seriously, I think the issue at play here is we look at the body of work of guys like Eloy, Slater, O'Hearn, Rivera, and (to a lesser extent) Soto, you see where the holes are. I get that O'Hearn was thrust into 1B near FT due to the Mountcastle injury, but that didn't explain Hyde from playing O'Hearn in the OF when he is one of the worst defensive OFers on this team. Right now, this team is very much ailing. Ramon coming back will definitely help spell the need for O'Hearn to be a 1B by maybe letting Rivera play over there.  We need to get back to a point where O'Hearn is only hitting against righties and is playing sparingly in the field. Eloy is a liability at this point. I was a proponent of seeing what mechanical tweaks they could make similar to what they did w/ Hicks (and even O'Hearn!) and they did catch lightning in a bottle maybe due to excitement/adrenaline and BABIP being unsustainably high, but right now his flyballs aren't carrying and his groundballs aren't finding holes, so there's probably a reason why Chicago is saying, "Haha, told you so!" This team is in freefall offensively, at this point...just give the ABs to Mayo. You can't simultaneously say, "He needs to make adjustments!" and then let him have 5 ABs over 5 games. That isn't a way to grow a player. Not everybody can be a part time player and be effective off the bench/sparingly. Kjerstad has shown an ability to hit lefties in the minors as well as in the majors (albeit in very limited time, he his 4 for 10 against them). Let the kid play. Slater has fallen off a cliff, but at least he's a solid defensive OFer I get it, nobody is going to solve the offensive woes of this team when it comes to the rookies/young guys. Mayo, Holliday, Kjerstad, even Cowser...they're all still adjusting. The change needs to come from the main stays. Now, Adley is starting to hit, Gunnar is back on a hitting binge, but this lineup desperately needs some consistent production from Tony to go along with it because right now way too much pressure is being put on the bottom of the lineup and the young guys. And I'm not convinced Westy solves any of those issues as wrist injuries are a beast to bounceback from quickly.   
    • I get the desire to poo-poo analytics and advanced data, etc.  It does get obnoxious hearing about statcast pages in red when guys aren't hitting well.   But more obnoxious are cries of "the old eye test" and "old school" and the other various "yelling at cloud" types of arguments.  If everyone was stuck with the way things were done back in the day, we'd never progress and never advance in any area of life or society.  That includes how we look at and discuss baseball.
    • If the above is true, how do you get a team to deliver timely hits, stop pressing, and quite expecting to lose?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...