Jump to content

Five things we’ve learned about Elias after two drafts


Frobby

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Philip said:

Santander Probably won’t survive the next wave of arrivals, but at the moment he is our second best outfielder. Wilkerson, Stewart, Smith, Mullins are all probably/definitely gone before Santander.

Santander is a bat first guy ....so if your right hopefully he will have trade value 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

Santander is a bat first guy ....so if your right hopefully he will have trade value 

I actually thought his defense is pretty good. But if he could be an average player, he will have some trade value, but not much.

It will be interesting to see what he does and the remainder of the season, if there’s any at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the O's lineup is mostly right-handed Santander is someone that could stick around for years.    Rutschman, Kjerstad, Henderson and Santander help balance the lineup even if Santander is the DH that can back up the OF corners.

Nunez and Mancini are probably more likely to be let go one way or another.  But that is all off in the distance since it will be 2 to 4 years until Kjerstad and Henderson are ready for the majors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it can be fun and all, but we should know better than to try and predict rosters several years out, especially when you are hoping the team is moving from terrible to good. 

From the 25 man roster for the divisional series against the Yankees in 2012, only 7 were even with the organization opening day 2010. (other notables: Markakis was injured, Arrieta and Britton were omitted from the roster). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/11/2020 at 11:05 PM, Frobby said:

1.   The guy has cojones of steel.    He’ll pick the guys he likes no matter what the consensus is on them.   

2.    He’s not afraid of a small sample size if the analytics support an upward trend.   For example, Kjerstad’s hot month outweighed the strikeout concerns presented the prior two seasons because the O’s projected that his swing changes would have produced a monster season.    

3.    He won’t reach for a pitcher.     If the guys he thinks are worthy of their draft spot aren’t there when it’s his turn to pick, he’ll wait round after round until he sees a good value.    

4.   He likes athletic players.     Not Kjerstad so much (though I think he’s pretty athletic, just not as fast as you’d like), but many of his other picks.   

5.   He’s not afraid of drafting hitters with unorthodox mechanics.

 


 




 

I’d add that’s more it’s clear he prioritizes make up in draftees. We’ve heard the term “growth mindset” used multiple times. This is similar to Theo with Chicago. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/11/2020 at 11:05 PM, Frobby said:

1.   The guy has cojones of steel.    He’ll pick the guys he likes no matter what the consensus is on them.   

2.    He’s not afraid of a small sample size if the analytics support an upward trend.   For example, Kjerstad’s hot month outweighed the strikeout concerns presented the prior two seasons because the O’s projected that his swing changes would have produced a monster season.    

3.    He won’t reach for a pitcher.     If the guys he thinks are worthy of their draft spot aren’t there when it’s his turn to pick, he’ll wait round after round until he sees a good value.    

4.   He likes athletic players.     Not Kjerstad so much (though I think he’s pretty athletic, just not as fast as you’d like), but many of his other picks.   

5.   He’s not afraid of drafting hitters with unorthodox mechanics.

 


 




 

That is a great post. I would add that he has an idea of what type of players and pitchers his development staff can work with best. He seems to have a very strong belief in the development staff. That is why he is not shy about drafting position players who need major swing adjustments like Stowers, Watson and Mayo. (Haskins is unorthodox, but I would not mess with him too much.) He likely weighs personality characteristics heavily to determine if kids are coachable, but he clearly believes in his development staff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/18/2020 at 4:49 PM, Philip said:

Santander Probably won’t survive the next wave of arrivals, but at the moment he is our second best outfielder. Wilkerson, Stewart, Smith, Mullins are all probably/definitely gone before Santander.

Santander did fine for a player basically in his rookie year playing all 3 OF positions.  He's a nice cheap asset.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Santander did fine for a player basically in his rookie year playing all 3 OF positions.  He's a nice cheap asset.    

I think he’s great. He’s versatile, hits ok and he defends ok, though he’s not great in CF.

The idea is that others behind him will be better. Right now, he’s definitely better than a lot of the alternatives, but that won’t be true by 2022.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Philip said:

I think he’s great. He’s versatile, hits ok and he defends ok, though he’s not great in CF.

The idea is that others behind him will be better. Right now, he’s definitely better than a lot of the alternatives, but that won’t be true by 2022.

That's likely true, but it's also a lot to assume.  I think there's some potential upside with him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've learned that I am likely skewed by being impatient and over reactionary.

That being said, I gave the draft a D after initially saying it "had to be an F" because of the late round selections. I just don't think any other GM would have had a first through third round close to what we had, being in the number 2 position in the draft. I know all teams have unique needs, but we need pitching and OBP, and I don't we got either in the first three rounds. We also have too many OF and SS now. I don't like hearing "has mechanical issues" at all, because so many of those are ingrained and very hard to fix. 

Time will tell, I thought Daniel Cabrera and Luis Matos would have multiple All-Star appearances, so clearly my intuition leaves much to be desired sometimes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, O-The-Memories said:

I've learned that I am likely skewed by being impatient and over reactionary.

That being said, I gave the draft a D after initially saying it "had to be an F" because of the late round selections. I just don't think any other GM would have had a first through third round close to what we had, being in the number 2 position in the draft. I know all teams have unique needs, but we need pitching and OBP, and I don't we got either in the first three rounds. We also have too many OF and SS now. I don't like hearing "has mechanical issues" at all, because so many of those are ingrained and very hard to fix. 

Kjerstad - .513

Westburg - .432

Haskin - .452

Servideo - .575

How do you know that these OBP won't translate, but guys we didn't take will be OBP guys?

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Wait....I already said that he doesn't dead lift, squat, or bench 500 pounds, let alone the 800 pounds as you said. I literally just said yesterday his Bench was maybeeeeee 300 with the help of pads and the sling shot, and his squat was 400.  Is that anywhere near 500 or the 800 that you claimed? So please, tell me where I said he was doing 500 pounds seriously?  I said that above sarcastically in response to your continued assertions that JH was doing elite power lifting numbers.  Which was ridiculous.  Just lol. 
    • I would agree.  He needs a complete reset.  Complete rest.  Starting to remind me more and more of Dylan Bundy.  A guy who FOR SURE early in his baseball life trained too hard.  Played too hard.  Took baseball too hard as a possible career.  By the time he grew into an adult man, he wasn't the player he was as a kid and young man.  Both mentally and physically.  I said this in an earlier post, but unlike most athletes, JH seems to have been groomed from the time he was 3 to be a baseball player.   He may already have the body of a 27 year old when it comes to wear and tear.   And I am sure since all he has ever done is baseball, there is a part of him mentally that is just tired. That is why with my son and daughter (5 and 9  ) I encourage them to play any and all sports, but focus on none.  Your true abilities in any sport will eventually come out.    Just don't over do it.  Even Tiger broke down from his dads complete obsession with making him the best.  The fact that Tiger actually did it is a testament to his mental strength.  That being said.......if you can get a boatload for him now?  I would do it.  I said it yesterday but he is not a special athlete.  He is a very good baseball player.  But not an elite athlete  despite what Corn says.   And this injury is not a good sign of what is to come. 
    • I like college bats after #10 until the end of the first round. My preference is for them to have some defensive value if possible. I like the idea of using comp picks to try to get high end high school bats. Its a risk/reward type of pick. I would have to know why they, (Burns and Smith) fell to that level. Pitchers break and that's a lot of money for a broken pitcher. I'd be very cautious, in other words.
    • I characterize “winning” as having a winning culture and established high level of play.  I don’t think we had that in the 2012-2016 run.  I think even the most orange tinted glasses saw that was a very short window with nothing to come after.  What we have now, and what the Ravens have established, is the ground work for continued winning and high level play. Above and beyond the on field accomplishments the organization is doing all the right things off the field and nurturing a relationship with the fans in a “winning” manner.  Winning was never the focus in the past.  Even the most ardent haters can see that winning is here for the foreseeable future on and off the field. 
    • Naw, I know sarcasm and that wasn't sarcasm. You are just changing your story.
    • Everyone is a sports psychologist and physical therapist now. He's a talented 20-year-old living his best life who struggled in a tiny sample size at the MLB level. The conspiracy theories that people create are absurd. He hurt his elbow, players get hurt at times, just about every one of them, it doesn't need to be over-analyzed.
    • Again...sarcasm? You guys are so quick to jump on anything I say and paint into a negative light it is BEYOND comical.  I feel as if I have my own trolls and internet 'haters' here. Relax.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...