Jump to content

Tom Eshelman


wildcard

Recommended Posts

I don't really expect him to be much more than a swing guy and/or depth option for teams in AAA in the long run, but this season is all about chances for the Orioles. I wouldn't mind seeing him given a chance as a No.5 starter or bullpen option. I expect he's ultimately replaced when the team starts promoting its pitching prospects, but I'd rather see if a 26 year old that doesn't walk many than some other options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He gets by on pure guile and pitchability which is actually amazing to watch. His plus command and ability to change speeds helps him have success, but his lack of movement and velocity on all of his pitches makes him pitch with  a very thin margin of error. 

Check out his baseball savant page and look at movement! Yikes. 

https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/thomas-eshelman-664045?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb

He's ok as a mopup guy or occasional starter because he can eats some innings but you have to be prepared for when his command isn't there because it's going to be a fireworks show. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

He gets by on pure guile and pitchability which is actually amazing to watch. His plus command and ability to change speeds helps him have success, but his lack of movement and velocity on all of his pitches makes him pitch with  a very thin margin of error. 

Check out his baseball savant page and look at movement! Yikes. 

https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/thomas-eshelman-664045?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb

He's ok as a mopup guy or occasional starter because he can eats some innings but you have to be prepared for when his command isn't there because it's going to be a fireworks show. 

And that's just the type of pitcher who can look really effective in preseason games.  Batters in preseason are up their to get their hacks, they will take a walk if it's handed to them, but they aren't going to lay off the borderline stuff just out of the strike zone like they would in a game that counts 

In a game that counts the best hitters in the world WILL lay off pitches just outside the zone and force the guy with a mediocre fastball to get more of the plate.  And of course in a regular season game they will have a detailed scouting report on Eshelman before the game.  I doubt that happens in exhibition games.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

He gets by on pure guile and pitchability which is actually amazing to watch. His plus command and ability to change speeds helps him have success, but his lack of movement and velocity on all of his pitches makes him pitch with  a very thin margin of error. 

Check out his baseball savant page and look at movement! Yikes. 

https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/thomas-eshelman-664045?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb

He's ok as a mopup guy or occasional starter because he can eats some innings but you have to be prepared for when his command isn't there because it's going to be a fireworks show. 

That watch a random video feature is really interesting.   Somewhat addicting, especially when you chose a pitcher like Gerrit Cole to watch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/21/2020 at 9:35 AM, Sports Guy said:

The only thing stat his MiL career that looks remotely promising is his BB rate.

But overall, there is nothing in his profile that should make anyone think he is much more than a AAAA player.

Between AA and AAA he's allowed five runs a game.  AAAA means he's done well in AAA but can't hack it in the majors.  He did well in AAA in 2017, but that's basically the only time as a pro he's looked like a prospect.  And even then his K rate was low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Between AA and AAA he's allowed five runs a game.  AAAA means he's done well in AAA but can't hack it in the majors.  He did well in AAA in 2017, but that's basically the only time as a pro he's looked like a prospect.  And even then his K rate was low.

I was trying to be nice. :)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • From here https://www.mlb.com/orioles/stats/ops/regular-season
    • Where are you getting your stats from that's not correct looking at OPS.
    • On the O's this year, Martinez would have been: 5th in OPS 5th in AVG 6th in HRs in 120 games
    • I think PFF is grading Roquan badly because the safeties behind him are playing like ass and it's making him look bad.  If teams are going to attack him over the middle on crossing routes with WRs (like KC did with Rice) he doesn't really stand much of a chance if the safeties behind him don't throw him a bone.  He's still a huge help in the run game.   In general I think PFF assigns a little too much blame to linebackers on passes over the middle, so unless you're an elite coverage guy at LB it's really hard to grade well.  The flip side to this is that teams probably need to adjust their coverage areas to account for the fact that LBs aren't going to be able to hold down WRs for long.  
    • Thanks. This tells me what my eyes have seen with Roquan. He's been a liability in coverage and the fact that Simpson is ahead of him is not good for our defensive leader. Do you have the PFF grades for offense too?
    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...