Jump to content

No more argument to play Chris Davis


accinfo

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

They certainly were.  Dehlman led the league in walks in 1875 with 11, and he was in the top 10 4 years - even though his career-high was 11.  And he had 1 fewer career homers than Glenn Gulliver.  Died at age 32 or 33 - not sure if it was over guilt about not playing up to his contract.     

In 1875 the league OPS was a Chris Davis-esque .571, lowest in history.  But they scored 6.14 runs a game, higher than any season since 1900.  This was mainly because the league fielding percentage was a Mark Reynolds-at-third-base-like .849.  Teams averaged almost seven errors a game.

In 2020 teams see eight hits, 3.5 walks, and half an error.  So basically 12 baserunners.

In 1875 it was almost 10 hits, a third of a walk, but something like seven ROE a game.  Over 17 baserunners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Is there a way to look up numbers over 1222 PA streak? I mean, I guy could of had a .580 OPS over 2000 PAs, but never had a block of 1222 PAs where he OPS'd under .600.

I can't figure out how to do that with the bb-ref tools.  Since they moved to Stathead from the Play Index they've dropped some things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

In 1875 the league OPS was a Chris Davis-esque .571, lowest in history.  But they scored 6.14 runs a game, higher than any season since 1900.  This was mainly because the league fielding percentage was a Mark Reynolds-at-third-base-like .849.  Teams averaged almost seven errors a game.

In 2020 teams see eight hits, 3.5 walks, and half an error.  So basically 12 baserunners.

In 1875 it was almost 10 hits, a third of a walk, but something like seven ROE a game.  Over 17 baserunners.

Amazing - I wonder what the fields were like then.  Too bad we can't look at the videos.  Maybe some day we'll find them from a lost satellite some fan made use of in a distant galaxy.  Or not.          

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Amazing - I wonder what the fields were like then.  Too bad we can't look at the videos.  Maybe some day we'll find them from a lost satellite some fan made use of in a distant galaxy.  Or not.          

Something like your local Little League field.  Although that might be demeaning to your local groundskeeper.  The first gas powered lawnmower was circa 1920.  There are stories of 19th century teams hiding extra balls in the tall outfield grass, and I don't think they're too much of an exaggeration.  And there weren't any crews dragging the infield before the 6th inning, I don't think they ever did. 

Somewhere I read a story about a game in maybe the 1920s, a major league game, where someone in the infield heard his spikes hit something under the ground and they dug up an old cooking pot from beneath third base. 

HOF 3B Freddie Lindstrom really doesn't belong there.  He was most famous for two balls hitting a rock and bouncing over his head in the same game of the 1924 World Series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, accinfo said:

Tony, you are just happy Haney or Vinnie didn't ask you on your segment today, "What about Chris Davis".  LOL.   In a side note the other Khris Davis with the A's is turning into the Orioles Chris Davis.

It was nice to not have a Chris Davis question from Vinnie! :D

Must be the curse of that name! Get paid, play like a chump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I can't figure out how to do that with the bb-ref tools.  Since they moved to Stathead from the Play Index they've dropped some things.

Yeah, I was trying to figure it out too but it does seem like things are missing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No leadership on this team to get into Chris Davis' face.  He strikes out like he doesn't care or doesn't have a clue, walks back to the dugout and all is good and nobody says a thing.  I'm talking every game he plays.  Somebody needs to light a fire with this guy because this is ridiculous.  Enough of this handholding poor Chris BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Earlier this spring there were threads about Davis putting on 25 LBS of muscle and he looked like his old self in spring training, long HR and being walked by pitchers.  And of course speculation  that he was on PED.  If he was, what happened?  Did he go off of the juice? Is he still more muscular or did he lose those 25 LBS during the long break? 

Just in theory, if a player was on PED then signed a huge contract it would be in his  financial interest to stop taking the PED the minute the ink is dry on that contract. I mean the only way the contact could be voided would be if he tested positive and was suspended. From a financial standpoint after signing,  it would seem much better to fail and be released, rather than take any chance of that contract being voided and losing millions. 

 I have no idea what's wrong with Chris Davis but I am wondering if it is ever wise to sign someone to a long term contract these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Yeah, I was trying to figure it out too but it does seem like things are missing.

Your right and I like the old version. One thing that I hate about the new version is it doesn’t show a guys tallied minor league numbers once he plays in the majors. 
 

The interesting thing is that @Can_of_corn posted a link showing them tallied but when I search I’m not getting that and I’m not sure why it wouldn’t make sense to auto calculate when you press the show minors tab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, OriolesWay said:

No leadership on this team to get into Chris Davis' face.  He strikes out like he doesn't care or doesn't have a clue, walks back to the dugout and all is good and nobody says a thing.  I'm talking every game he plays.  Somebody needs to light a fire with this guy because this is ridiculous.  Enough of this handholding poor Chris BS.

Welcome to the board....I believe that Davis his still having attention deficit issues. Yes I’m saying whatever he’s taking with clearance is not effective. But his bigger problem is that his reaction time is gone.

All the fire in the world won’t improve the lost reaction time. Which is a long term side effect of the medication he’s used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roll Tide said:

Your right and I like the old version. One thing that I hate about the new version is it doesn’t show a guys tallied minor league numbers once he plays in the majors. 
 

The interesting thing is that @Can_of_corn posted a link showing them tallied but when I search I’m not getting that and I’m not sure why it wouldn’t make sense to auto calculate when you press the show minors tab.

If I remember what you are referring to correctly I just used the minor, fall and winter league tab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If I remember what you are referring to correctly I just used the minor, fall and winter league tab.

Thanks ...doesn’t make sense. Sometimes when I hit that button it shows the years but not the totals. That happened the other day when we were discussing Severino’s minor league at bats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Maverick Hiker said:

 I have no idea what's wrong with Chris Davis but I am wondering if it is ever wise to sign someone to a long term contract these days.

As long as baseball is a $10B industry with free agency there will be long term contracts.  Teams want to win for both prestige and the added revenues.  Someone will always use their cash to buy more wins.  Some of those contracts will work out, teams like the Yanks and Sox don't just automatically go into the tank when they sign someone to a 10/300 deal, they mostly just keep on winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • 100%! I say abolish divisions, play a fully balanced schedule and take the top 4 or 6 or 8 or whatever teams in each league to the playoffs. 
    • The question was asked, a few months ago, whether winning the division was necessary. A lively debate resulted, some saying the division didn’t matter(“just make the playoffs and anything can happen”) and some taking the opposite view. I wanted the Division and I’m disgusted the play has been so bad. And I haaaate the Yankees( sports hate. I’m sure they are all great guys in person.) It will not magically improve, and I despair of winning more than two more games…not even 90 wins. And in a Homer–prone park, how many homers will the Os give up? The thought is not comforting. And there’s little reason to think things will improve against the Tigers or Royals. But at least: 1) next year they will hopefully have Bautista and the position players healthy. 2) The farm has very few MLB-ready players so there won’t be so much bouncing back and forth. Hopefully the guys can settle in and just play. 3) the Os will be looking for a fourth consecutive winning season, which hasn’t happened since the 70s So there’s that…
    • I was about to post a similar thread, but despite my memory issues, I recalled this thread.  I still find myself enjoying sports less and less.  The issue is not my teams, but myself.  It's a sad reality that I'm bothered when my team doesn't win, or does win, but wins in a way that is not how I wanted them to!  LOL!  It's ridiculous.  Frankly, I'm somewhat ashamed. The O's are very likely going to the playoffs.  But instead of being happy about that, I'm more concerned with how awful we've been and how little I expect from them as the post-season draws near.  A real fan loves his team and sticks with them, through thick and thin.  It's absolutely okay to be critical, even frustrated, at times, but when those are the default and dominant expressions, it makes me feel... less than.  It's like this with all my favorite teams (O's/Ravens/Terps).  It's therapeutic, in a way, to reveal such truths.  But the quest to find a way to enjoy sports again, to enjoy what my teams are doing, is a process that is taking longer than I'd hoped.  
    • I wouldn’t say I’m fired up.  I’d like to do enough to (1) win the season series (which only takes one win), (2) clinch a playoff spot (which probably only takes one win, depending what other teams do, and (3) improves our chances of getting the no. 4 seed (which might take a couple of wins, depending how other teams do).   
    • It feels like a foregone conclusion that the O’s sneak in with the third wild card spot and then lose the wild card series. So it just doesn’t really matter all that much what happens from here on out.    Then again, get hot at the right time and this could still be a World Series contender. I have to see some fire in this team before I entertain that thought though.
    • I am not really fired up per se.  I am just hoping that something happens that is different than what we have seen for months.  A late comeback to win the game.  A big inning of 4 runs or more.  Some big hits from Adley or Holliday.   1 win means we win the season series against everyone in the East for the second year in a row.  That would be great.  And even if we lose, I am hoping that watching the Yankees celebrate in front of them and the fans celebrate around them fires them up.   
    • I feel like I asked once years ago, but can someone please explain the acronym “MFY?”
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...