Jump to content

Santander may odd man out in 2021 or 2022


ofan239

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, joelala said:

Missed the throw, I was cooking, I’ll have to find it.  He’s certainly a very good defender and I love the way he plays but that style of play may be a detriment to his body; he has proven he cannot stay on the field. I think .260 is a more realistic expectation, but sure, if he can stay healthy he’s a good player worthy of playing time. But he can’t stay healthy, so it’s moot to me. 
 

 

His ability to stay on the field is a concern, but I think it’s premature to say he has “proven” he can’t stay on the field.   I’d say it in the converse: he hasn’t proven that he can stay on the field.    Yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is too good of both a talented hitter and fielder to write him off.  Yes he has had more than his share of injuries but this last one he took a fastball of his ribs and they broke.  I put that in the category of being unlucky more that being injury prone.  If your rib is broken it is difficult to play.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m sort of playing devil’s advocate.   But with more and more balls being hit in the air, the old assumptions about which positions are most important defensively could shift.   

I also think that you don’t need as much range as you used to to play a position because of shifts.  If a right hand hitter is up you have three guys usually on the left side of infield or lefty up you are over on right side with three infielders.    The shortstop doesn’t have to cover up the middle as much with these shifts so is closer to third base side.  It will also be intersting if the approach to hitting chances as it use to be go up the middle and it was a hit now it is an easy grounder to one of the shifted infielders playing behind second.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

His ability to stay on the field is a concern, but I think it’s premature to say he has “proven” he can’t stay on the field.   I’d say it in the converse: he hasn’t proven that he can stay on the field.    Yet.

That’s fair, I’ll accept that converse. Next season should tell us a lot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Frobby said:

His ability to stay on the field is a concern, but I think it’s premature to say he has “proven” he can’t stay on the field.   I’d say it in the converse: he hasn’t proven that he can stay on the field.    Yet.

I don't know if there's anything you can prove about staying healthy or injured unless you have a chronic problem that keeps coming back.  Paul Molitor's career is a good example.  Games he missed from his 2nd season on: 20, 51, 55, 2, 10, 149, 20, 57, 44, 8, 7, 59, 4, 4, 2, 0, 14, 1, 27, 36.  He was injured all the time in his 20s, then was as durable as just about anyone from 34-39.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I don't know if there's anything you can prove about staying healthy or injured unless you have a chronic problem that keeps coming back.  Paul Molitor's career is a good example.  Games he missed from his 2nd season on: 20, 51, 55, 2, 10, 149, 20, 57, 44, 8, 7, 59, 4, 4, 2, 0, 14, 1, 27, 36.  He was injured all the time in his 20s, then was as durable as just about anyone from 34-39.

Sure but that’s obviously an outlier.

Most athletes don’t frequently stay injured in their 20s and then, all of a sudden, become durable in their 30s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Sure but that’s obviously an outlier.

Most athletes don’t frequently stay injured in their 20s and then, all of a sudden, become durable in their 30s.

Seems like this is an opinion as much as a fact, but I don’t know.

I *feel* like a lot of guys work through injury issues and eventually stabilize as relatively healthy. I also feel like many never get over the injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Seems like this is an opinion as much as a fact, but I don’t know.

I *feel* like a lot of guys work through injury issues and eventually stabilize as relatively healthy. I also feel like many never get over the injuries.

I don’t have data in front of me but I think it’s fairly obvious.  Remember, I said athletes.  Their bodies are so essential to them and when they start to break down, it’s hard to turn that around and be good enough to compete at this level as you get older.  Your skills diminish as you get older as it is.

Baseball may be a little different because it’s not a physical sport but football and basketball are.  
 

But I would bet most guys who just keeping hurt over and over also don’t end up staying in the league either.  Their injuries take a lot out of them and they can’t perform at that professional level anymore.  Not to mention, the pain to play through starts to become too much.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • ZiPS being an inhuman thing incapable of recency bias is not much out on Holliday.    It only dings his 2025-2029 forecast WAR by about 3% today relative to what it was forecasting this spring. https://blogs.fangraphs.com/reassessing-the-future-for-this-seasons-disappointing-rookies/ Jackson Holliday’s numbers didn’t take a big hit for a few reasons. First, and most importantly, despite a really lousy debut in the majors, he played well enough in the minors — plus he’s so young and his résumé is so strong — that his small-sample struggles barely register. By reverse-o-fying Holliday’s major league woes into an untranslated minor league line and including it in his overall Triple-A production, ZiPS estimates that he would’ve had a 118 wRC+ in Triple-A this season, down from his actual mark of 142. A 20-year-old shortstop with a 118 wRC+ in Triple-A would still top everybody’s prospect list.
    • Kjerstad should also get some reps in at first so he can be an option there as well, although now is probably not the time, best for him to DH for the rest of the season. He had 8 starts at first at AAA this season and 37 starts there between AA and AAA in 2023.
    • In Grich’s case, I think his OBP skills weren’t appreciated at the time.  He was a .266 lifetime hitter in an era when that was maybe 10 points above average, but his .371 OBP was more like 45-50 points above average.  But OBP just wasn’t very valued at the time.  
    • We don’t have a current combo that is ideal. You have to go with the best possible grouping you have.
    • Yep, we're in agreement on the 70 rWAR threshold.  A championship would help Manny's cause, though I'm not sure if that's in the cards for him in the near future.  He needs a big moment on a big stage, too....as silly as that sounds, I do believe it matters in the eyes of some voters. Not to derail, but Whitaker is a guy that belongs in the HoF, too.  I'm not sure why Grich never got serious consideration.
    • I’ve always felt that 70 rWAR was the line between having to justify why someone shouldn’t be in the HOF versus justifying why they should.  In other words, if you’re over 70, there needs to be a reason for you NOT to be in.  There are 70 position players over 70 WAR, and the only ones not in are Bonds, Pujols (not yet eligible), Trout (not yet eligible), Rose, Bill Dahlen, Lou Whitaker, Raffy Palmeiro, Bobby Grich, and Carlos Beltran.  Really, only Dahlen, Whitaker and Grich have no obvious reason why they’re not in.  And I wouldn’t bet against Beltran getting in eventually.  He’s gotten  46% and 57% of the ballots his first two tries.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...