Jump to content

2021 HOF vote


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yea, those old school guys were such beacons of character and integrity.

Fixing stuff like this is simple, take his vote away.  My guess is he did this to attract attention and he succeeded in that.  He obviously isn't interested in the actual process of enshrining players in the Hall.

Some of their contemporaries thought that the old school guys were beacons of character and integrity.  So what if Mountain Landis did his best to keep blacks out of baseball?  He banned 8 members of the 1919 White Sox.

Maybe he did it to attract attention, but that attention doesn't last past 5 minutes.  No one's going to remember David Skretta in a week from now.  No one can name the voters who didn't vote for Cal Ripken and prevented him from being picked unanimously.

My guess is that David Skretta likes being on the moral highground and likes to remind people how virtuous he is.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are many voters who don’t vote for players with a known history of using PEDs.     This guy is hardly alone on that score.   As to the players who are eligible for the first time, do any deserve to be in the HOF?

Personally, I’d vote for Schilling.   I’m not a fan of his political views or various things he’s done or said since his playing career ended, but he deserves to be in the HOF for what he did on the field.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

There are many voters who don’t vote for players with a known history of using PEDs.     This guy is hardly alone on that score.   As to the players who are eligible for the first time, do any deserve to be in the HOF?

Personally, I’d vote for Schilling.   I’m not a fan of his political views or various things he’s done or said since his playing career ended, but he deserves to be in the HOF for what he did on the field.

He didn't even give that as a reason. 

Not sure why you are asking about first year eligible players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

He didn't even give that as a reason. 

Not sure why you are asking about first year eligible players.

Because anyone who is a repeater obviously had at least 25% of voters vote against them in each year they’ve been eligible.   So this guy isn’t out there on an island regarding those candidates.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...