Jump to content

Fan Graphs: Grayson Rodriguez on His Changeup, Which Isn’t a Screwball (Or Is It?)


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/grayson-rodriguez-on-his-changeup-which-isnt-a-screwball-or-is-it/

This quote alone shows the difference in the development of our pitching prospects

Quote

"I like to attack with my fastball sets up my changeup well, how it moves and what it looks like out of my hand. As I’ve learned how to throw it with TrackMan and Edgertronic cameras, I’ve figured out a way to get the ball to spin exactly how I want it to. "

Laurila: When and how did you begin developing it?

Rodriguez: “I went home after finishing my first season — this was 2018, in the GCL after I got drafted — and I was at the workout facility I’ve been going to for a couple of years. Josh Tomlin, who was with Cleveland forever and is now is with the Braves, was there. I was talking to him about how the Orioles really wanted me to be working on a changeup, how they thought it would fit well in my arsenal. Josh is a very smart pitcher, and he kind of showed me, and told me, what a changeup is supposed to do — what the perfect changeup would be like.

“I was working on that. How to move it — the pronation of your wrist — and then when I got to spring training for my first full season, Justin Ramsey, who was my pitching coach in low-A, along with Chris Holt, our big-league pitching coach who at the time was our pitching coordinator… we really got after it with the slow-motion cameras. We did a lot of crazy things, like draw stripes around the baseball, to see how it was moving. Once we figured out the wrist positioning and the wrist movement — once we refined all that — then it was just a matter of which grip would fit me the best.

“We spent hours studying how the ball left my hand, and just how the ball was spinning. We were moving it around in bullpens, getting different feels in my hand with how the ball sits. Finally, we found the perfect grip. We just started rolling with it from there.”

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Fantastic article here.   Grayson with a very detailed description of how his changeup works and how he developed it.    Talk about pitch design!     https://blogs.fangraphs.com/grayson-rodriguez-on-his-changeup-which-isnt-a-screwball-or-is-it/

Great stuff here. Love the stuff about working with Holt one on one. This next wave of pitchers really seems to have bought in to what the player development staff has been asking of them. Can't wait to see what the results are once the seasons start. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, murph said:

Ah I see!   He says it at the very end of the article.   He likes the way the ball is coming out of his hand!   

Yes but there is a difference between just SAYING that and being able to quantify it with spin rate and angle of pronation and vertical and horizontal movement measurements!

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am of the mindset that the 2 most underrated aspects of a pro athlete are health/availability and intelligence.  “Baseball IQ”, in this case, is really important imo.  
 

This article makes me feel that GRod not only has the stuff to be a MLer but also the mindset and intelligence to do it.

That’s the type of guy you want to have on your side.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

I am of the mindset that the 2 most underrated aspects of a pro athlete are health/availability and intelligence.  “Baseball IQ”, in this case, is really important imo.  
 

This article makes me feel that GRod not only has the stuff to be a MLer but also the mindset and intelligence to do it.

That’s the type of guy you want to have on your side.

Yep, it's a huge part that can't really be measured by anything other then observing their actions. Part of what made Mancini max out his potential is because of those attributes as well. These "intangibles" are sometimes the difference between becoming a star or just being an average player or in some cases, even making the major leagues vs being a minor leaguer.

Elias (and yes I know he did not draft Rodriguez) seems to put a lot into tools and baseball IQ/work ethic. I've yet to hear a bad thing said about his high draft picks when it comes to these attributes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Yep, it's a huge part that can't really be measured by anything other then observing their actions. Part of what made Mancini max out his potential is because of those attributes as well. These "intangibles" are sometimes the difference between becoming a star or just being an average player or in some cases, even making the major leagues vs being a minor leaguer.

Elias (and yes I know he did not draft Rodriguez) seems to put a lot into tools and baseball IQ/work ethic. I've yet to hear a bad thing said about his high draft picks when it comes to these attributes.

The Patriots have basically built their team through the eyes of intelligence.  Guys that don’t do dumb things to hurt the team on or off the field.  Guys who can do multiple things and aren’t afraid to do it.

The Ravens had those great defenses because of the football IQs of guys like Reed and Ray.  It’s just underrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

This is already on the minor league board. Please keep minor league stuff on their board, thanks.

Oops, sorry!    Needless to say, I hadn’t seen your post.   Anyway, it’s one of the most detailed articles I’ve read and not only does it reflect well on Holt, it reflects very well on Rodriguez.    This guy is a serious student of the game.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Oops, sorry!    Needless to say, I hadn’t seen your post.   Anyway, it’s one of the most detailed articles I’ve read and not only does it reflect well on Holt, it reflects very well on Rodriguez.    This guy is a serious student of the game.   

Yes, it was nice to read how much Rodriguez puts into making himself the best he can be. Bodes well for his future success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
    • Santander does exactly ONE thing very well: Hit HRs He doesn't hit for average, he doesn't get on base, he's a very slow runner, and he is a very poor defender. If he stops hitting HRs so often, his value completely evaporates and his contract basically becomes dead money, and the Orioles cannot afford to eat large amounts of dead money like the Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees of the world. I am simply using Trumbo, whose basic tool kit is very similar to Santander's, as a fairly recent, Orioles-related cautionary tale. Trumbo had his big walk year with the Orioles at age 30 and instead of doing the smart, obvious thing and taking the free draft pick, we gave him a big money extension that everyone except the FO knew was probably going to end poorly. Baseball Savant has Santander in the 22nd percentile in terms of overall fielding value. However you want to slice it, he isn't going to make up any lost value from declining offense with his defense. If his ability to slug goes south, the whole contract goes with it, because he has no other tools to make up for that with.
    • Santander is -2 OAA this year. He’s averagish to below average. There but there are much worse defensive right fielders such as Adolis Garcia and Castellanos -9, Lane Thomas and Renfroe -8, and Soto -4. Acuna and Tatis are also -2 OAA.  In 2016, Mark Trumbo was -15 OAA. They’re not even in the same universe.
    • Anthony Santander (age 27-29): .245 / .317 / .477 / .794    124 OPS+   9.0 rWAR Mark Trumbo (age 27-29): .244 / .299 / .443 / .742   105 OPS+  2.6 rWAR Is it really very meaningful that Trumbo was the better player when they were significantly younger? 29-year-old Santander is a better player by miles than Trumbo at the same age, and he has been for years. I think that’s what matters most to how you’d project them over the next few years.
    • I love Tony and I honestly think we are gonna miss his veteran leadership as much as anything. I’m very happy we have him for this year. But I do think he’d be a bad long term investment. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...