Jump to content

Fangraphs positional power rankings


Frobby

Recommended Posts

C 27th, 0.9 rWAR

1B 23rd, 0.6 rWAR

2B 28th, 0.5 rWAR

3B 23rd, 1.5 rWAR

SS 28th. 0.8 rWAR

This link takes you to the SS ratings and in that article there are links to the other positions.   They haven’t done OF, P or DH yet    I expect we’ll do better in the OF, and maybe DH.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was struck with terror upon seeing the title of the article, but now I am feeling astonishment that three sets of catcher are anticipated to be worse than ours.

I also find it rather surprising that we spent a considerable amount of money at second base and shortstop to remain barely above replacement level

Edited by Philip
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Philip said:

I was struck with terror upon seeing the title of the article, but now I am feeling astonishment that three sets of catcher are anticipated to be worse than ours.

I also find it rather surprising that we spent a considerable amount of money at second base and shortstop to remain barely above replacement level.I also find it rather surprising that we spent a considerable amount of money at second base and shortstop to remain barely above replacement level.

Pump the brakes there, Phil.  What considerable amount of money did we spend at SS and 2nd base?

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Philip said:

Sanchez and Galvis? Didn’t we spend 6 figures on each?

Bro, those guys aren't anywhere near the top 10 at their position in terms of compensation.  A quick look at Spotrac has Galvis as the 31st highest paid SS in the game.  Yolmer Sanchez is 29th highest paid 2nd baseman.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the first base one was a little suspect. They had Davis getting like 150 at bats and being worth -0.6 WAR. That doesn't sound too crazy, but what if he doesn't get that many at bats? What if he doesn't get any? They were relatively high on Mountcastle and Mancini. I think by their own projections, the O's would have a top 50% 1st base unit if Davis doesn't play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TommyPickles said:

I thought the first base one was a little suspect. They had Davis getting like 150 at bats and being worth -0.6 WAR. That doesn't sound too crazy, but what if he doesn't get that many at bats? What if he doesn't get any? They were relatively high on Mountcastle and Mancini. I think by their own projections, the O's would have a top 50% 1st base unit if Davis doesn't play.

Lord willin'.  

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Bro, those guys aren't anywhere near the top 10 at their position in terms of compensation.  A quick look at Spotrac has Galvis as the 31st highest paid SS in the game.  Yolmer Sanchez is 29th highest paid 2nd baseman.

So what you're saying is that Elias exploited a market inefficiency? Paying 29th for 28th production is a win, right?

I mean, if I'm ownership and I know we're not going to win, I guess this would be a standard to judge Elias on.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

Bro, those guys aren't anywhere near the top 10 at their position in terms of compensation.  A quick look at Spotrac has Galvis as the 31st highest paid SS in the game.  Yolmer Sanchez is 29th highest paid 2nd baseman.

That’s a wonderful way of skirting my question which was, “didn’t we spend six figures on each of them?”

If we spent 1,000,000+ on each guy and we’re not getting even a single WAR out of either, the alternatives must’ve been really really bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Philip said:

That’s a wonderful way of skirting my question which was, “didn’t we spend six figures on each of them?”

If we spent 1,000,000+ on each guy and we’re not getting even a single WAR out of either, the alternatives must’ve been really really bad

I think the point is that $1,000,000 in MLB is the equivalent of Wal Mart prices, not Tiffany's. We got Wal Mart players for Wal Mart prices. There's plenty to complain about, but the anticipated "value" received for that cost is very reasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I was hoping that would be this season, but he faded this second half. But even Gunnar not living up to his lofty expectation is still a good player with an .811 OPS.
    • Mike Elias simply can't offer Michael Baumann, Cristian Pache, Connor Norby and Kyle Stowers this kind of experience. Jack Flaherty was kind of Meh again, but hey, at least he isn't on Detroit for this weekend. It is a special player to get to watch.    He's reviving some of the Babe Ruth "he hits too brilliantly to let him pitch" stuff, but hombre is going to do whatever he wants to do, it is part of the deal.    It does seem pretty likely the SB to this scale are a 1-time deal with the legs getting the year off from the mound. I do have a baseball-y wish to see if he could be Ken Griffey, Jr. in center field if he tried.
    • 6-4 (54 RS, 34 RA) 7-3 (63 RS, 59 RA) 6-4 (40 RS, 28 RA) 7-3 (43 RS, 31 RA) 6-4 (48 RS, 38 RA) 7-3 (58 RS, 29 RA) 7-3 (50 RS, 28 RA) 4-6 (61 RS, 60 RA) 7-3 (46 RS, 51 RA) 3-7 (32 RS, 50 RA) 5-5 (60 RS, 62 RA) 5-5 (50 RS, 49 RA) 5-5 (46 RS, 45 RA) 6-4 (54 RA, 36 RA) 3-7 (21 RA, 44 RA) 0-1 vs. CWS, 1-2 vs. TBR, 1-2 at BOS, 1-2 at DET Three games late with this update.   It was our worst offensive ten game segment by a wide margin.  
    • Hopefully it will be like giving a blood transfusion to a sickly patient. Yes some players haven't played as well this season, but it's mainly the injuries that have taken it's toll. The lineup gets much better if Westburg, Urias and Mountcastle are back. No longer does Eloy have to play and Holliday can be platooned. Plus O'Hearn will absolutely not see at bats against LHP like he has been recently at times. Webb and Coulombe provide depth to make the bullpen postseason viable. And Coulombe can close games instead of Dominguez assuming he's back all the way.
    • Gunnar stands to improve on: fielding and stolen bases. I also think he’ll have a 1.000OPS season or two before he’s done.
    • Maybe they were going by Tony's reaction, not realizing that with the winning run on third there wasn't any point in running.
    • looks like some of y'all are gonna be pissed when we win 2 of 3 against Detroit, at least one in NY and 2 o 3 against Minn.  I'd be embarassed if I were some of you....projecting the apathy and misery in your own little lives onto our O's.  This is a F upped sport and a team with talent like this can turn on a dime and start winning consistently at any time.  This isn't over.  I you're mad that your life hasn't worked out well......please don't bring the rest of us down.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...