Jump to content

NL VP of Scouting : " It’s embarrassing to the sport what they’re doing, or aren’t doing."


jamesenoch

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

It is not as if Dan's group were complete failures when it came to producing ML talent, even if Dan traded a fair bit of it away.

Dans group were dismal at developing starting pitching. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't literally everyone agree that with a lost season of minor league games, we have almost no clue how well Elias has acquired and developed guys since he's been here?

The indications are good, from the pitching and winning statistics in year 1 generally, to the development of Baumann and Lowther specifically. Yet we have no clue if we've found a diamond through the international draft, or if guys like Stowers or Welk will surprise, etc. Who even knows about Kjerstad? Individual players aside, regardless of who is drafted, my sense is that the chances of success of the players inside our minor leagues are higher than they were at any time over the last 30 years.

Still, while I'm all in on Elias, I admit that we have to see the product improve on the field before we give him an unequivocal thumbs up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LookinUp said:

Doesn't literally everyone agree that with a lost season of minor league games, we have almost no clue how well Elias has acquired and developed guys since he's been here?

Are you seriously trying to apply logic to a sports fansite?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LTO's said:

Contrarian is contrarian 

Gausman and Bundy were representational products of their draft position.  Matusz had some early success as a starter.  Eduardo Rodriguez has had a nice career as has Zach Davies.

That's enough to move them out of dismal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

 

Gausman and Bundy were representational products of their draft position. Matusz had some early success as a starter. Eduardo Rodriguez has had a nice career as has Zach Davies.

That's enough to move them out of dismal.

 

o

 

Chris Tillman also came alive in 2012, after struggling in his first 3 seasons in the Majors from 2009 through 2011.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Gausman and Bundy were representational products of their draft position.  Matusz had some early success as a starter.  Eduardo Rodriguez has had a nice career as has Zach Davies.

That's enough to move them out of dismal.

Yeah, I stopped taking you seriously at Gausman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Gausman and Bundy were representational products of their draft position.  Matusz had some early success as a starter.  Eduardo Rodriguez has had a nice career as has Zach Davies.

That's enough to move them out of dismal.

I think the issue is everyone wants to link the last 3 decades all into one. I can see the argument from say post Mussina era until last decade. Not recently. 

9 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Yeah, I stopped taking you seriously at Gausman. 

Gausman was better here than he gets credit for. 
 

There is this idea all these other teams also all develop all their starters. It’s false. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eddie83 said:

I think the issue is everyone wants to link the last 3 decades all into one. I can see the argument from say post Mussina era until last decade. Not recently. 

Gausman was better here than he gets credit for. 
 

There is this idea all these other teams also all develop all their starters. It’s false. 

No but there's this idea that guys leave Baltimore and go on to do better elsewhere.  It's true.

Gausman wasn't great.  That's why we traded him for bad bargaining chips and Atlanta dumped him quickly, too.  SF might have been able to figure him out but I wouldn't bet on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

No but there's this idea that guys leave Baltimore and go on to do better elsewhere.  It's true.

Gausman wasn't great.  That's why we traded him for bad bargaining chips and Atlanta dumped him quickly, too.  SF might have been able to figure him out but I wouldn't bet on it.

Dumping O'Day's contract really impacted the Gausman return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

No but there's this idea that guys leave Baltimore and go on to do better elsewhere.  It's true.

Gausman wasn't great.  That's why we traded him for bad bargaining chips and Atlanta dumped him quickly, too.  SF might have been able to figure him out but I wouldn't bet on it.

Gausman also has stretches where he pitches well until he doesn't. I want to see what a full season of Gausman looks like in San Francisco. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

No but there's this idea that guys leave Baltimore and go on to do better elsewhere.  It's true.

Gausman wasn't great.  That's why we traded him for bad bargaining chips and Atlanta dumped him quickly, too.  SF might have been able to figure him out but I wouldn't bet on it.

Look around the sport. How many good pitchers are with their original drafted team?  
 

Gausman has been all over the map since he left. Bundy I thought made strides here his last season. No idea how he would have fared here how he stayed. I think his style of pitching is a better fit out west also. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

No but there's this idea that guys leave Baltimore and go on to do better elsewhere.  It's true.

Gausman wasn't great.  That's why we traded him for bad bargaining chips and Atlanta dumped him quickly, too.  SF might have been able to figure him out but I wouldn't bet on it.

We’ve gotten back at least one interesting piece in Zimmerman. If he ends up as a back of the rotation guy for the next 3 or so years that trade is worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Dumping O'Day's contract really impacted the Gausman return.

He was never going to bring back an orgs top 5 prospect which is really bad considering his age and prospect pedigree. You are really overrating his value at that time and the effect Odays contract had. 
 

Dan and co. brought him up before he developed a consistent breaking pitch and after a while his fastball was teed off on. That’s a failure of development for a very promising prospect.  What even is the point of mentioning Erod and Davies? Both of them developed elsewhere. The fact that both of them were traded for rentals means that Dan clearly didn’t value them very highly. Another absolute failure on his part in regards to pitching in the org. Dan stripped this org down to nothing to win ONE playoff series. I don’t get why people look back so fondly on his time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I was hoping that would be this season, but he faded this second half. But even Gunnar not living up to his lofty expectation is still a good player with an .811 OPS.
    • Mike Elias simply can't offer Michael Baumann, Cristian Pache, Connor Norby and Kyle Stowers this kind of experience. Jack Flaherty was kind of Meh again, but hey, at least he isn't on Detroit for this weekend. It is a special player to get to watch.    He's reviving some of the Babe Ruth "he hits too brilliantly to let him pitch" stuff, but hombre is going to do whatever he wants to do, it is part of the deal.    It does seem pretty likely the SB to this scale are a 1-time deal with the legs getting the year off from the mound. I do have a baseball-y wish to see if he could be Ken Griffey, Jr. in center field if he tried.
    • 6-4 (54 RS, 34 RA) 7-3 (63 RS, 59 RA) 6-4 (40 RS, 28 RA) 7-3 (43 RS, 31 RA) 6-4 (48 RS, 38 RA) 7-3 (58 RS, 29 RA) 7-3 (50 RS, 28 RA) 4-6 (61 RS, 60 RA) 7-3 (46 RS, 51 RA) 3-7 (32 RS, 50 RA) 5-5 (60 RS, 62 RA) 5-5 (50 RS, 49 RA) 5-5 (46 RS, 45 RA) 6-4 (54 RA, 36 RA) 3-7 (21 RA, 44 RA) 0-1 vs. CWS, 1-2 vs. TBR, 1-2 at BOS, 1-2 at DET Three games late with this update.   It was our worst offensive ten game segment by a wide margin.  
    • Hopefully it will be like giving a blood transfusion to a sickly patient. Yes some players haven't played as well this season, but it's mainly the injuries that have taken it's toll. The lineup gets much better if Westburg, Urias and Mountcastle are back. No longer does Eloy have to play and Holliday can be platooned. Plus O'Hearn will absolutely not see at bats against LHP like he has been recently at times. Webb and Coulombe provide depth to make the bullpen postseason viable. And Coulombe can close games instead of Dominguez assuming he's back all the way.
    • Gunnar stands to improve on: fielding and stolen bases. I also think he’ll have a 1.000OPS season or two before he’s done.
    • Maybe they were going by Tony's reaction, not realizing that with the winning run on third there wasn't any point in running.
    • looks like some of y'all are gonna be pissed when we win 2 of 3 against Detroit, at least one in NY and 2 o 3 against Minn.  I'd be embarassed if I were some of you....projecting the apathy and misery in your own little lives onto our O's.  This is a F upped sport and a team with talent like this can turn on a dime and start winning consistently at any time.  This isn't over.  I you're mad that your life hasn't worked out well......please don't bring the rest of us down.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...