Jump to content

Dean Kremer 2021


Il BuonO

Recommended Posts

There were some rumors that they asked for May.

I wanted Lux and May in that deal.  Neither were top 100 guys at the time and both were in A ball.  I don’t know if they would have dealt either or both but Dan seemed to want quantity over quality (although I do like Kremer and Diaz).  
 

Diaz was highly rated when we got him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Are you telling me Dan didn’t ask about their better prospects? He shopped Manny around and took the best deal. Running out of time with a deadline looming. 
 

Diaz is exhibit A of the limitations he had. Diaz cost the Dodgers a ton of money and then they use him to make a deal. Dan never had any talent like that. 

Are you Dan's brother? We don't know exactly what deals were out there but looking at it now, it looks to be a pretty poor/mediocre trade. Kremer probably has a back of the rotation/Swingman on a bad team ceiling/floor and Diaz could possibly become an average regular at a corner OF spot if things break right. He may not have been able to get May or Verdugo but the Dodgers system was stocked full of talent and he didn't get any of those guys who weren't as hyped at the time. We know when he was shopping Britton at the 2017 deadline he wanted Colin Moran from the Astros. In his three years with the Pirates he's been at best a replacement level player. Not sure that would've been deemed a success. Dan did a decent job supplementing a roster full of Macphail/Buck players, but he was a terrible at identifying minor league talent in our system as well as other teams'. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LTO's said:

Are you Dan's brother? We don't know exactly what deals were out there but looking at it now, it looks to be a pretty poor/mediocre trade. Kremer probably has a back of the rotation/Swingman on a bad team ceiling/floor and Diaz could possibly become an average regular at a corner OF spot if things break right. He may not have been able to get May or Verdugo but the Dodgers system was stocked full of talent and he didn't get any of those guys who weren't as hyped at the time. We know when he was shopping Britton at the 2017 deadline he wanted Colin Moran from the Astros. In his three years with the Pirates he's been at best a replacement level player. Not sure that would've been deemed a success. Dan did a decent job supplementing a roster full of Macphail/Buck players, but he was a terrible at identifying minor league talent in our system as well as other teams'. 

No. He was my neighbors, cousins, best friends, college roommate. 
 

The trade may not work out great. I just recall at the time how the media kept saying the Dodgers weren’t willing to give up their top guys. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eddie83 said:

No. He was my neighbors, cousins, best friends, college roommate. 
 

The trade may not work out great. I just recall at the time how the media kept saying the Dodgers weren’t willing to give up their top guys. 
 

I remember that talking point and it was reported everywhere that the Dodgers were not going to give up any of their top prospects in a trade. Hopefully DD took the best offer on the table for Machado even if the trade doesn't work out well long term. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LTO's said:

Are you Dan's brother? We don't know exactly what deals were out there but looking at it now, it looks to be a pretty poor/mediocre trade. Kremer probably has a back of the rotation/Swingman on a bad team ceiling/floor and Diaz could possibly become an average regular at a corner OF spot if things break right. He may not have been able to get May or Verdugo but the Dodgers system was stocked full of talent and he didn't get any of those guys who weren't as hyped at the time. We know when he was shopping Britton at the 2017 deadline he wanted Colin Moran from the Astros. In his three years with the Pirates he's been at best a replacement level player. Not sure that would've been deemed a success. Dan did a decent job supplementing a roster full of Macphail/Buck players, but he was a terrible at identifying minor league talent in our system as well as other teams'. 

Dan was not a great GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Philip said:

Dan was not a great GM.

Definitely debatable. Hard to ignore 3 playoff appearances. Also hard to ignore running the organization into the ground the last couple years. But - ALSO hard to ignore Peter Angelos/Brady Anderson having a say in some of the worst decisions of Duquette's tenure.

Dan's era is complex and contains multitudes.

I like Dan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, interloper said:

Definitely debatable. Hard to ignore 3 playoff appearances. Also hard to ignore running the organization into the ground the last couple years. But - ALSO hard to ignore Peter Angelos/Brady Anderson having a say in some of the worst decisions of Duquette's tenure.

Dan's era is complex and contains multitudes.

I like Dan. 

Ok No point in rehashing it. He is gone, and the people who are glad he’s gone have plenty of grounds for their feelings.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LTO's said:

Are you Dan's brother? We don't know exactly what deals were out there but looking at it now, it looks to be a pretty poor/mediocre trade. Kremer probably has a back of the rotation/Swingman on a bad team ceiling/floor and Diaz could possibly become an average regular at a corner OF spot if things break right. He may not have been able to get May or Verdugo but the Dodgers system was stocked full of talent and he didn't get any of those guys who weren't as hyped at the time. We know when he was shopping Britton at the 2017 deadline he wanted Colin Moran from the Astros. In his three years with the Pirates he's been at best a replacement level player. Not sure that would've been deemed a success. Dan did a decent job supplementing a roster full of Macphail/Buck players, but he was a terrible at identifying minor league talent in our system as well as other teams'. 

That's the question. What have been comparable returns to the Manny deal that got back more than Kremer/Diaz. I assume the deal we got from the Dodgers was the best that was offered. No reason to think otherwise. If you were the Dodgers, who do you give up for a couple months of Manny that is better than Kremer/Diaz? What are comparable rental deals that got back more? The bigger problem was DD did not trade Machado earlier when he had more value, but he was a lame duck GM with no incentive to do anything but try and win with the group he had. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

 

SEATTLE MARINERS )))))) (April 12th)

Mitchell Haniger - DH

Tyler France - 2B

Kyle Seager - 3B

Jose Ramon Marmolejos-Diaz - LF

Luis Alfonso Torrens Saez - C

Taylor Walter-Lee Trammell - CF

Evan White - 1B

Dylan Moore - RF

John Paul "J.P." Crawford - SS

Justus Kane "J.K." Sheffield - LHP )) (0-1, 7.20 ERA)

 

 https://www.baseballpress.com/Lineups

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The game is already tied. If he gets thrown out, the O's still have a runner in scoring position and just one out. You really didn't have much to lose by sending him there, with a chance to end the game.
    • Yes.  He’s not a great bunter but at least try it once.   Santander was today’s choker.  He’s gotta be able to hit a freaking fly ball there.  
    • Same exact question Ravens fans ask every season.  No killer instinct.  In the game’s biggest moments, they come up small.  Exactly what you saw today.  Pathetic 
    • Should we have gone with a suicide or safety squeeze with Mullins? He might be better at bunting than hitting deep fly balls. Just a thought. 
    • I agree with the second but not the first. If the first fails, that's an extra out. If the second fails then they just get an out at home instead of an out at first, which is not really relevant with Gunnar going to 3rd. For the first case I'd think you need to be like 80% to succeed for it to be right, but for the second like 20%.
    • Bump. Tonight's game wasn't just "winnable" -- it would have been one of the top 2-3 wins of the season. Down 2 in the 9th and we come out single, single, walk, double to tie the game and have two of our fastest runners on 2nd and 3rd with no outs, with our 2-3-4 hitters coming up next.  And our guys gagged. They wilted under pressure. They choked.  Again.  This has happened so many times this season that I believe we need to consider the real possibility that the Orioles as currently constructed lack the character, stamina, -- the heart, if you will -- to win games like this. I think these players fail so often because they expect to fail. I remember after we won it all in '83 reporters were interviewing Ken Singleton in the locker room and one of them asked if the Orioles had been lucky. "You make your own luck" he responded. Well, the 2024 Orioles are making their own bad luck over and over again. How does that cycle of failure come to an end? I wish I knew.
    • I know the OH hates Holliday, but it's a no brainer keeping him over Soto. We're talking about bench players who are going to, at most, have a small role in a few games. Soto has no pop and is slow. He's a warm body as it is. Holliday's ability to run can be very useful in the playoffs. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...