Jump to content

What do you think of Tyler Wells?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

While you're probably correct, there's nothing harder on a baseball fan of a contending team than having the bullpen blow a bunch of games.    

Having said that, I'm fine with whichever direction the O's go with him.  

Thank Christ, we're not a contending team then.  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hoping that, through free agent/trade acquisitions and promotions, the number of starters who are either expected to be reliable or deserving of a trial in the rotation will not leave room for T. Wells (the tall one without the accent) in the rotation, and that he'll start the season as the closer.

I'm not confident that will happen, but I hope it will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Not funny, and of course, we weren't talking about this year.  At some point, it might be nice to not think like a perpetual loser.  

It's pretty funny and it is entirely accurate.

Worrying about not blowing leads when we have- sans Means- the worst starting staff I think I've ever seen, is putting the cart before the horse, to say the least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pickles said:

It's pretty funny and it is entirely accurate.

Worrying about not blowing leads when we have- sans Means- the worst starting staff I think I've ever seen, is putting the cart before the horse, to say the least.

How do you not understand that I was talking about the future?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just so we're clear:

I don't disagree with you because I have a "loser's mentality."  I don't disagree with you because I can't "understand."

I disagree with you because what you're saying is fundamentally wrong.

Worrying about the bullpen before the rotation is ass backwards.

That's all.  I'm not angry about it.  I'm not trolling you.  I'm not being disrespectful.

Saying that Wells shouldn't get a chance to start next year because contending teams need good bullpens is bad logic.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Just so we're clear:

I don't disagree with you because I have a "loser's mentality."  I don't disagree with you because I can't "understand."

I disagree with you because what you're saying is fundamentally wrong.

Worrying about the bullpen before the rotation is ass backwards.

That's all.  I'm not angry about it.  I'm not trolling you.  I'm not being disrespectful.

Saying that Wells shouldn't get a chance to start next year because contending teams need good bullpens is bad logic.

Fine, let's go 1 out at time to clear this up:

1.  I wasn't talking about you having a loser's mentality.  I was talking about team management.

2.  Skip.

3.  I did not say to put the bullpen before the rotation.  I said I'm fine with whichever way the team goes - as far as starting him or using him in the pen.  

4.  Glad to hear you're not trying to be disrespectful.  That wasn't the impression I got.

5.  I didn't say Wells shouldn't get a chance to start next year.  I said I'd be fine with whatever decision the team makes.

Are we good?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

Fine, let's go 1 out at time to clear this up:

1.  I wasn't talking about you having a loser's mentality.  I was talking about team management.

2.  Skip.

3.  I did not say to put the bullpen before the rotation.  I said I'm fine with whichever way the team goes - as far as starting him or using him in the pen.  

4.  Glad to hear you're not trying to be disrespectful.  That wasn't the impression I got.

5.  I didn't say Wells shouldn't get a chance to start next year.  I said I'd be fine with whatever decision the team makes.

Are we good?

 

 

We're good, man.

I personally feel strongly that Wells should get a chance to start next year.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The Sunday game didn't get a scorecard for some reason, but the impact for Cleveland was a full +1.36, as Cory Blaser took a run off the scoreboard by taking away an RBI walk for Ryan O'Hearn on a 3-2 pitch and punching him out to end the inning (also denying the Orioles the run expectancy with bases loaded and two out in the AB after).
    • Kjerstad came into this year with 18 days of service time and has been up and down this year. He won’t qualify for a full year of service time even if he stays on the MLB roster the rest of the year, but I think it does make the difference in whether he is Super 2.
    • His lack of a got to whiff pitch concerns me. I mentioned in the game thread that he reminded me of Bruce Zimmerman a bit though Zimmerman has a better slider and worse changeup. But they both throw about the same with the same command.  There is no way I'd trust him pitching against a good lineup with the stuff we've seen from him since being acquired. Obviously with Grayson going down, his role is more highlighted now, but it's going to be hard to manage a bullpen with two guys in the rotation that are really one time through the order guys.
    • Potentially you are correct. I think the Orioles assumed something might be up, but I doubt Kjerstad was reporting concussion symptoms still and they optioned him. Seems like not a good way to deal with players.  My guess is Kjerstad reported more symptoms when he got to Norfolk and that is why he did not play there and eventually was put on the major league IL.
    • Velo was about the same, higher on the sinker but lower on the 4 seamer. He definitely has an issue of starting off the game with better velo and then a lot more 89-90 in the later innings, that’s been the case both starts. But I thought the command was much better, they made a big deal out of him needing to throw up and in to righties on the broadcast and he did that well.  A lot more changeups and fewer sliders, although that could be a byproduct of the Jays having such a righty heavy lineup. Anecdotally it seemed when he was throwing the slider to righties, he was backdooring it off the plate outside trying to get called strikes, which is worse for whiffs but a much safer location than going down and in where it could leak back over the plate and get hammered. IMO his biggest issue is he’s not going to get many whiffs throwing so many sinkers. I expected more 4 seamers in the mix. Cutting down the sliders and replacing with more changeups is good, and the changeup can get whiffs, but 36% sinkers and 21% four seamers generated only 3 whiffs - and only 1 on the sinker. Going to be very hard to get strikeouts unless he throws even more changeups and/or shifts to more 4 seamers over sinkers. 
    • All of this makes sense and also explains why Eloy was acquired and why Kjerstad was "optioned." Something was not right and his 2-for-18 after returning was probably a sign that he was not fully back from his concussion. Sometimes these things take longer than that and to each person it can be different.  Hopefully with more rest Kjerstad will be back in September and ready to help the team during the stretch drive. 
    • Holliday does not consistently chase. He has not done in in his professional career this far. Look at the career minor league OBP. This is a young man with a 70 grade hit tool. I am extremely confident that he will take his walks.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...